By this point, you already know that collaborative, patient-centered care models are the way of the future. It only makes sense. Providers cannot continue to operate in silos, because patients aren’t their diseases, conditions, or injuries; they’re whole people—and a whole person may require an entire team of practitioners working together to provide the best possible care at the best possible time in the most holistic way. In order to implement this new care methodology, though, we need interoperability in health care. Providers must be able to communicate with one another in real time—they must be able to seamlessly collect, analyze, use, and exchange data about their patients and their interventions. That way, everyone on a patient’s care team—from the hospital triage team to the outpatient physical therapy provider who continues care after the patient is discharged—is informed and knowledgeable about the whole picture, not just a tiny slice.

The PT’s Guide to Software Implementation and Training - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Software Implementation and Training - Small Banner

We’ve entered a data-driven world.

Speaking of data, with the demise of PQRS—and rehab therapists’ inability to fully participate in its replacement program, MIPS, until at least 2019—many providers thought they’d have a break from data collection. But, as WebPT’s president, Heidi Jannenga, explains in this post, that would be unwise. After all, the entire healthcare industry is moving into a data-driven paradigm—one that has far-reaching consequences, like informing future payment structures and influencing legislative decisions. The more therapists hold out, the harder it will be to catch up once it becomes mandatory.

Plus, there are several new alternative (a.k.a. bundled) payment models coming down the pipeline. In fact, one of the most rehab-relevant bundles—the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model—is already in effect. This program not only holds hospitals financially responsible for the outcomes of joint replacement cases, but also offers incentives for improved coordination with ancillary providers such as rehab therapists. Of course, for programs like this to be successful—and scalable—everyone in the entire care network must be able to communicate. And the best way to ensure efficient communication among providers is to implement systems that not only speak the same language, but also automatically exchange the information necessary to keep everyone up to date on each patient’s status. In fact, ancillary providers who aren’t using software with interoperable functionality won’t even be able to participate in these programs. Faxing notes back and forth isn’t going to cut it any longer.

And that new world requires standardization and interoperability.

As Jannenga writes in this Becker’s Healthcare article, there are two main barriers to our current data collection processes:

  • “the jumbled array of measures providers in different areas of practice are using to collect data, and
  • the lack of interoperability (i.e., connectivity) between the systems where the data is being collected and stored.”

Jannenga believes that to solve these problems, the healthcare industry must embrace standardization—“both in terms of quality measures and data-collection measures”—and the adoption of technology that supports data exchange. This will not only enable a patient’s care team to work together to better serve that patient, but also “reduce the costs associated with redundant or unnecessary care; improve the overall value of care; and arm healthcare providers and leaders with the data necessary to address healthcare needs at a population level.”

Download your 2018 State of Rehab Therapy report now.

Enter your email address below, and we’ll send you a free comprehensive report on the trends shaping the future of the industry.

Please enable JavaScript to submit form.

But, interoperability does not mean uniformity.

As Jannenga also points out, interoperability and uniformity are not one in the same: “Achieving large-scale data-exchange doesn't necessarily mean adopting one overarching data-collection technology,” she writes. “In fact, requiring providers in all disciplines to use the same system would entirely defeat the purpose of the solution, as it would be impossible to create a system that's optimized for every provider's specific needs and workflows.” Rather, Jannenga argues that all providers should be equipped with technological solutions that enable them to document “in a way that aligns with their individual treatment workflows—and then share that information in a way that preserves the integrity and meaning of the data.” Without that, “details crucial to a patient's case could be lost in translation from one specialist to the next—thus detracting from the benefits of collecting quality data in the first place.” Hence, the case for specialized software as opposed to universal adoption of a one-size-fits-all EHR behemoth—because really, one size never actually fits all.

Wondering what you can do to prepare your clinic for the shift toward collaborative care and interoperability? As WebPT’s Brooke Andrus explains in this post, providers should demand technology that:

  • “aligns with their clinical needs and workflows,
  • “tracks patient data—including outcomes data—in a meaningful and scalable manner, and
  • “plans to integrate and exchange data with other systems at some point in the (hopefully near) future.”

We don’t have to tell you that your patients—and your place in the greater healthcare community—are worth it. After all, sharing is caring.

  • The State of Interoperability in Outpatient Rehab Therapy  Image

    articleJan 2, 2017 | 6 min. read

    The State of Interoperability in Outpatient Rehab Therapy

    We’ve been talking about the importance of interoperability in health care for a while now—in articles like this one , this one , and this one . And while the idea of open, seamless data exchange among healthcare systems and providers always seemed like a great thing to have, it’s quickly becoming much more of a must-have. That’s because a collaborative-care, pay-for-performance healthcare model requires that providers from all disciplines actually communicate with one another in real-time …

  • The Case for Specialized Software: Why Your Hospital EHR Hinders Patient Care and Increases Risk Image

    articleJul 28, 2016 | 6 min. read

    The Case for Specialized Software: Why Your Hospital EHR Hinders Patient Care and Increases Risk

    If you Google “hospital EHR,” you’ll initially receive an overwhelming number of search results for the EHR systems themselves—essentially, advertisements and promotions for their software. Wade through those results, though, and you’ll uncover a wealth of articles in which hospital practitioners complain about their technology and how it negatively impacts patient care. Search “private practice EHR,” and you’ll encounter the same thing. And these complaints are, by and large, voiced by physicians—the people for whom these systems …

  • Founder Letter: 4 Predictions for PTs, OTs, and SLPs in 2017 Image

    articleJan 5, 2017 | 15 min. read

    Founder Letter: 4 Predictions for PTs, OTs, and SLPs in 2017

    Last year, I laid out a handful of predictions for 2016 —and what do you know? Most of them were spot on. In fact, much of what I covered—think interoperability, the importance of data collection, payment reform, and the push toward private practice consolidation—are all holding strong and will surely continue into 2017 (well, barring any unforeseeable curveballs to the state of health care as we know it, that is). In the meantime, though, here’s what I …

  • So Long to Silos: Why Health Systems Must Embrace Interoperability Now Image

    articleSep 9, 2016 | 5 min. read

    So Long to Silos: Why Health Systems Must Embrace Interoperability Now

    Rome wasn’t built in a day—and interoperability across all health data systems won’t be achieved overnight. In fact, we’ve been paving the road to complete connectivity for several years now , and there’s still no definitive end in sight. But now, more than ever, the companies providing those systems have some serious incentive to hasten the pace of their construction efforts: I’m talking about the nationwide push toward value-based, patient-centered care delivery . After all, to succeed …

  • 3 Reasons Interoperability is the Difference-Maker for Patient Experience Image

    articleAug 21, 2017 | 6 min. read

    3 Reasons Interoperability is the Difference-Maker for Patient Experience

    The discussion about interoperability has been a long-standing one. By now, we all understand the importance of ensuring that the data healthcare providers record is accessible to other healthcare professionals. As Maxwell Stroud—lead consultant of Galen Healthcare Solutions—wrote in this Healthcare Informatics article , “We want the data that we collect to be visible, actionable, and presented in context.” And to achieve that, “we analyze the needs of the hospital, the clinics, the lab, the billing office, …

  • The PT’s Guide to Software Implementation and Training Image

    downloadSep 26, 2016

    The PT’s Guide to Software Implementation and Training

    With the right processes in place, you’ll be able to have your cake and eat it, too—and by that, we mean have your perfect physical therapy software and a seamless implementation process. Yup, that even includes training. In this guide, we’ll outline four big steps—and a lot of little ones—that will help you ensure a smooth swap. Enter your email address below, and we’ll send your free guide.  

  • The State of Rehab Therapy Image

    downloadJul 14, 2017

    The State of Rehab Therapy

    To see results from our most recent industry survey, check out the 2018 State of Rehab Therapy Report. Health care is not a static industry. It’s always changing, evolving, and progressing. No healthcare provider is immune to the effects of that change, but some—including physical, occupational, and speech therapists—have felt a greater impact than others. In an effort to assess the scope of that impact—and thus, better anticipate the future needs of the rehab therapy community—WebPT conducted …

  • Best-of-Breed Solutions vs. Jack-of-All-Trades Software Image

    articleJan 7, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Best-of-Breed Solutions vs. Jack-of-All-Trades Software

    After nearly ten years in sales and marketing, I’ve heard—and probably used—every figure of speech imaginable. Whether we’re advising to not count your chickens before they hatch or imploring that you not cry over spilled milk, we use these phrases to succinctly make our points. Perhaps that’s why we’re seeing a debate unfold in our industry pitting “best-of-breed” solutions against “jack-of-all-trades” software. And with our very own Heidi Jannenga deeming 2015 as “ the year of the …

  • Physical Therapy Software Buyer’s Guide Image

    downloadSep 26, 2016

    Physical Therapy Software Buyer’s Guide

    In this guide, you’ll learn how to identify the system requirements that are paramount to your clinic’s success; which crucial questions to pose to potential vendors to suss out their products’ potential; and how to obtain buy-in about the transition from internal stakeholders. In short, it’s everything you need to find a solution that’s worthy of you—and your practice. Enter your email address below, and we’ll send your free guide.

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.