“I love insurance payers!” If you were to compile a list of phrases that physical therapists are least likely to say, I’m betting that one would be somewhere near the top. And this sentiment certainly isn’t unwarranted. After all, payers—both commercial and federal—are notoriously difficult to work with.

On top of that, they often make it especially difficult for beneficiaries to access rehab therapy services. In fact, when we conducted our recent State of Rehab Therapy industry survey, we found that across all disciplines, rehab therapy professionals cited insurance requirements as the top barrier to patients accessing care on a direct access basis—and it remained the top barrier regardless of the level of direct access available in any particular state. Survey respondents also reported that government and other third-party (i.e., insurance) regulations—along with higher patient deductibles and patient financial responsibility—were the first- and second-biggest barriers to providing effective patient care.

The State of Rehab Therapy in 2019 Guide - Regular BannerThe State of Rehab Therapy in 2019 Guide - Small Banner

Creating a Costly Conundrum

Of course, rehab therapy providers have been dealing with dwindling payer reimbursements for years, but the recent shift in patient financial burden is making it even tougher for therapy clinics to stay afloat—especially those that rely heavily on third-party reimbursements. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, “annual premiums reached $18,764 for 2017, up 3 percent from 2015 for an average family coverage with workers on average paying $5,714 towards the cost of their coverage.” And that’s just employees with employer-based health insurance. For those purchasing private-market insurance in 2018, “the average increase with subsidies was $201.” To add insult to injury (sometimes literally), those rate hikes have largely happened without commensurate expansions in coverage—specifically for rehab therapy services. So, many plans end up discouraging patients from seeking rehab therapy care due to the high out-of-pocket cost. As a result, this makes it harder for patients with neuromusculoskeletal conditions to achieve optimal care outcomes—which ultimately leads to poorer overall health.

Finding Common Ground

With all of that said, it’s no wonder healthcare providers and consumers often point to insurance companies as the “big evil” clogging up the entire healthcare system. But here’s the great irony in that stereotype: insurance payers exist to provide beneficiaries with access to safe, quality care. (We know this because of the often arduous credentialing processes that help ensure payers contract with providers who meet their standards.) And that means ultimately, payers and providers want the same thing: to help patients achieve optimal health outcomes and avoid dangerous, costly treatment that could result in further complications down the road. And while it’s easy to dismiss this all as a cash grab on the payer end, the reality is there are a lot of complicated contributing factors to the skyrocketing cost of health care. So, here’s the real question: why aren't insurance payers making therapy services more accessible—despite the overwhelming evidence that physical therapy is both clinically effective and cost-efficient?

Hanging in Specialist Limbo

Part of the problem is the manner in which insurance payers categorize physical therapists. As WebPT’s Brooke Andrus explains in this post, “Physical therapists typically fall into the specialist category, and on the surface, that designation makes sense. After all, PTs specialize in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. The problem is that insurance plans often require beneficiaries to contribute higher copayments for specialized care.” Unfortunately, that problem has only gotten worse.

That’s because—in an effort to keep patient insurance premiums low—insurance companies have shifted a greater portion of the treatment cost to the patient. As a result, copays have steadily increased. As physical therapist Jill Murphy explains in this article, “In some cases, the consumer actually pays more than what the therapy provider is actually reimbursed, paying in excess of 100 percent of the cost of care.”

PTs aren’t typical specialists.

Generally speaking, patients see specialists under a very specific set of circumstances—often only a few times a year, which makes it easier for those patients to justify the financial burden of a large copay. Physical therapy patients, however, typically attend multiple sessions a week for an extended period of time, making that expenditure a lot harder to swallow. On top of that, PT is a specialty in which patients typically must pay a copay for every visit, whereas many other specialties require a single hefty copay at the start of care that covers the cost for all subsequent visits.

As Matt Hyland, PT, PhD, MPA, CSCS, points out in this article for PT in Motion, “You'd be referred to an orthopedist by your general practitioners—maybe you needed surgery or maybe you didn't—and you'd pay the higher copay. All of your follow-up visits were covered under that single copay. Well, with physical therapy they not only charge the higher copay, they also do it every single time you come in.”

Lacking Data

Of course, the other roadblock is an overall lack of data. Numerous existing studies speak to the effectiveness of physical therapy in treating everything from chronic pain to cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, compared to traditional care routes like surgery and prescription meds, PT is a considerably more cost-effective (and safer) option for managing these conditions. So, logic would suggest that insurance payers would be hopping aboard the PT train in droves.

And yet, that’s still not happening. A big part of the reason why could be that—despite the research—the only proprietary data that payers have access to is information on service utilization and cost. In other words, there isn’t much in the way of outcomes data collection on the payer end. But, that’s not entirely for lack of trying: Medicare (along with a few commercial payers) have used functional limitation reporting as a way to collect data on the effectiveness of therapy services—and inform reimbursement changes. However, as WebPT’s Brooke Andrus reported here, CMS recently proposed to end the FLR program in 2019, as the agency “‘reviewed and analyzed the [FLR] data internally but did not find them particularly useful in considering how to reform payment for therapy services as an alternative to the therapy caps.’”

Clearly, there is still a great need for payer visibility into therapy provider outcomes, and as Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC, WebPT’s president and co-founder, wrote here, therapists must “take matters into our own hands” by “adding the same data-tracking to-do to our individual lists.” In other words, it’s up to therapy providers to deliver the data that shows the entire healthcare world—payers and patients alike—just how valuable they are.

Taking the Next Steps

So, where do we go from here? How can rehab therapists advocate for themselves when it comes to payment reform? Are insurance companies really the enemy? After all, as I mentioned above, providers and payers appear to want the same thing. So, how can they find that common ground? To start, you, as a therapy provider or advocate, can:

  • Be part of the APTA’s efforts to limit copays (and get involved with the APTA Action Center); and
  • Call or write to the legislative powers that be and give them your perspective as someone who is actually in the trenches.

As overwhelming as advocacy seems, efforts to limit copay amounts and/or remove rehab therapists from the specialist designation have met with success in several states, including:

You can also begin tracking your own outcomes data and using it as leverage during payer contract negotiations and renegotiations. If you can present data proving the effectiveness of your care, it’ll become one of your biggest bargaining chips to obtain a better payment rates. Furthermore, these provider-level interactions represent the therapy industry’s first step toward fostering a positive partnership with insurance payers—instead of continuing to be at odds.

The fact is, insurance companies have a pretty negative rep on both the patient and provider ends. That’s certainly not without just cause. After all, they’re the ones who control the cost and reimbursement rates, right? But, there are definitely things providers can start doing right now to change payer perceptions of PT. All it takes is a little cooperation.

  • Common Questions from Our Cash-Based Physical Therapy Webinar Image

    articleAug 30, 2017 | 19 min. read

    Common Questions from Our Cash-Based Physical Therapy Webinar

    Earlier this week, WebPT’s president and co-founder, Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, teamed up with cash-based physical therapy guru Dr. Jarod Carter, PT, DPT, MTC, to host a webinar covering all things cash pay —from insurance contracting considerations and Medicare rules to self-referral marketing and service pricing. Thousands of rehab therapy professionals registered to attend, which means we received a ton of questions—so many, in fact, that there was no way we could answer all of …

  • In-Network, Out-of-Network, or Cash-Based: Which Model is Right for Your Practice? Image

    articleMay 19, 2017 | 7 min. read

    In-Network, Out-of-Network, or Cash-Based: Which Model is Right for Your Practice?

    Making the right decisions for your rehab therapy private practice can be challenging. Nagging questions may even keep you up all night—questions such as, “ Am I paying my employees enough ? Or, “Should I send unpaid balances to a collections agency ?” Or, with regard to in-network vs. out-of-network vs. cash-based, “Which payment model is right for my practice?” While we wish we could give you all the right answers—so you can get some rest—we can’t. …

  • 5 Things PTs Must Do to Take Over the World (as Told at the 9th Annual Graham Sessions) Image

    articleJan 19, 2016 | 12 min. read

    5 Things PTs Must Do to Take Over the World (as Told at the 9th Annual Graham Sessions)

    To most people, Graham Sessions probably sound like something that would take place next to a crackling campfire—with a bag of jumbo Jet-Puffed marshmallows, a bar of creamy Hershey’s milk chocolate, and a box of crisp Honey Maids. When I attended my first Graham Sessions last year , I was initially disappointed to discover that this beloved annual event had nothing to do with s’mores. What I soon realized, though, is that this forum—often touted as a …

  • Common Questions from our Cloudy with a Chance of Reform Webinar Image

    articleFeb 13, 2017 | 13 min. read

    Common Questions from our Cloudy with a Chance of Reform Webinar

    In our first webinar of 2017 , WebPT’s co-founder and president, Heidi Jannenga, teamed up with CEO Nancy Ham to discuss the current and future healthcare trends that will impact PTs, OTs, and SLPs. (Missed it? No worries; you can view the complete recording here .) As always, we received quite a few questions during the presentation—way more than we could address live. So, we’ve put them all here, in one handy Q&A doc. Scroll through and …

  • Death to Denials: 4 Strategies for First-Pass Claim Payment Image

    articleMay 1, 2017 | 4 min. read

    Death to Denials: 4 Strategies for First-Pass Claim Payment

    Claim denials are the worst. You provide your patients with exceptional therapeutic intervention—and bill their insurance companies to recoup payment for those services—only to find out that the payer has no intention of actually doing any paying. Womp, womp. While you could—and should—implement a process to correct and rebill denied claims, wouldn’t it be even better to stop them from happening in the first place? After all, it costs providers an average of $25 to rework a …

  • What's the Right Payer Mix for Your Practice? Image

    articleJul 17, 2018 | 6 min. read

    What's the Right Payer Mix for Your Practice?

    Insurance payments for healthcare services have been declining for a while now , which means providers in all disciplines are looking for ways to optimize their payer mix in order to maximize their revenue. If you haven’t yet calculated the cost of providing your services—and compared that number to the payments you’re receiving to ensure you’re actually making enough money to not only cover those costs, but also turn a profit—then you should. But the question remains: …

  • Verification Vexation: What to Do When You Can't Get a Hold of a Payer Image

    articleJun 16, 2017 | 5 min. read

    Verification Vexation: What to Do When You Can't Get a Hold of a Payer

    Unless you’re a character in a teen movie from the ’90s , you probably don’t love hanging out on the phone all day. But even the average teenager would undoubtedly agree there’s a better way to spend your time than sitting on the phone with an insurance payer. I know—getting in touch with insurance payers can be a huge pain. Between scheduling, data entry, and collecting patient forms and payments, there’s not a whole lot of time …

  • PT Billing Secrets: 5 Things Payers Don’t Want You to Know Image

    webinarApr 1, 2016

    PT Billing Secrets: 5 Things Payers Don’t Want You to Know

    You’ve probably heard the saying, “Don’t hate the player; hate the game.” It’s a go-to hip-hop lyric, but its relevance isn’t limited to rap artists. The same holds true when it comes to insurance companies. Sure, payment rates for physical therapy services are on the decline, but the payer isn’t necessarily the problem. After all, in health care—as in any business—cutting costs is the name of the game. And in an effort to bolster their bottom lines, …

  • Direct Access Laws by State (Missouri-Pennsylvania) Image

    articleDec 12, 2017 | 9 min. read

    Direct Access Laws by State (Missouri-Pennsylvania)

    If you haven’t been keeping up with the WebPT Blog over the past few days, here’s what you’ve missed: I’ve been breaking down all of the state-level direct access laws from coast to coast. (You can check out the laws for Alabama to Hawaii here and Idaho to Mississippi here .) If you have been keeping up, then welcome back! (Cue the “Welcome Back, Kotter” theme song.) Today, I’m tackling the laws from M to P—that’s Missouri …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.