The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model is a new payment model that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is rolling out as part of its aim to have 50% of all Medicare fee-for-service payments come from alternative payment models by 2018. The CJR will support better care for patients who are undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgeries—the two most common inpatient surgeries for Medicare beneficiaries. CMS believes that “effective implementation of the CJR model will improve the quality and efficiency of care for Medicare beneficiaries, which is essential to creating a health care system that delivers better care, spends our dollars more wisely, and leads to healthier Americans.”

The State of Rehab Therapy in 2019 Guide - Regular BannerThe State of Rehab Therapy in 2019 Guide - Small Banner

The Background

In 2014, more than 400,000 Medicare-covered hip and knee replacement surgeries were performed, totalling more than $7 billion in hospitalization costs alone. You’d think that with such a high volume of surgeries, there’d be some level of consistency in terms of quality of care and cost, but that hasn’t been the case: both vary dramatically across providers, facilities, and geographic locations. According to CMS, “the rate of complications like infections or implant failures after surgery can be more than three times higher at some facilities than others, increasing the chances that the patient may be readmitted to the hospital.” Surgery, hospitalization, and recovery costs Medicare anywhere between $16,500 and $33,000.

The Model

Under the CJR model, participating hospitals are financially responsible for the quality and cost of a CJR episode of care. Incentives will be awarded for greater coordination of care across hospitals, physicians, and post-acute care providers, including physical therapists. According to the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), the hospital will control the payment bundle and be allowed to share the savings—and risk—with collaborating providers.

Per CMS, the episode of care begins when a patient—who eventually will be discharged under MS-DRG 469 (major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity with major complications or comorbidities) or 470 (major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity without major complications or comorbidities)—is admitted into a participating hospital. It ends 90-days post-discharge—thus allowing for adequate recovery time—and includes all services covered under Medicare Part A and Part B, with certain exclusions.

The CJR model began on April 1, 2016, and will run for five years in 67 geographic areas (scroll through the table below to see them all). According to this APTA slide deck, Medicare estimates that this initiative will result in $153 million in savings.

 

Powered by Socrata

 

The Impact

All total hip and knee replacement procedures for Medicare beneficiaries performed within the designated areas will fall under the CJR—and that includes rehabilitation services performed during the episode of care. If you treat Medicare patients who have had elective primary hip and/or knee replacements—and your practice is located within one of CMS’s chosen geographic areas—you may want to consider marketing yourself to local hospitals as a CJR collaborator, because it could result in increased revenue and potential profit sharing. According to the APTA, similar models are bound to crop up, so even if you’re not practicing within one of these 67 locations, you still may get an opportunity to participate in this type of arrangement.

As the APTA notes in this Contracting Checklist, “contracting will likely be complicated,” and CMS has yet to provide clear guidelines about how hospitals should attribute profit and risk, which means the specifics of any collaborative relationship will depend on the contract with the hospital. So, before you enter into any bundled payment agreement for a collaborative care model, check out this toolkit (also from the APTA). It contains some very important things to consider as you determine whether your practice will benefit from this type of contract—or if you should give the CJR some time to play out before getting involved. These items include:

  1. The background, outcomes, and patient satisfaction ratings of the hospital you’re considering partnering with as well as those of their other collaborators.
  2. Your own patients’ outcomes and satisfaction ratings as well as the cost of providing treatment. (Value = outcomes/cost.)
  3. Your clinic’s risk tolerance, target market, staff capacity, and distance from the hospital.

“No single payment methodology is inherently good or bad,” writes the APTA. “And each has potential to pay you fairly or poorly for the services you deliver. When evaluating payer contracts, select those that make the most sense for your particular practice setting and goals.”

Pros and Cons of Accepting Bundled Payments

Here’s a pro/con list for accepting bundled payments that I adapted from the APTA’s Contracting Checklist:

 

Pros
Cons

Could increase business and revenue; more potential referrers

Only applies to a specific market segment

Could lead to practice growth

Could require additional space and/or staff

Potential for profit sharing

Risk of financial liability

Encourages collaboration with care team

Ability to impact collaborators’ performances and collaboration may be limited

Motivates providers and practices to achieve positive outcomes

Must rely on entire care team to achieve positive outcomes

Demonstrates the value of PT

Requires data collection

Enables participation in a brand new care model

Is new, meaning there are bound to be changes and further developments

Affords the opportunity to influence care delivery system

Influence may be limited

Gets providers collecting quality data

Data collection could require additional infrastructure, including IT

Bolsters development of community relationships

Developing and maintaining community relationships requires resources

 

According to the APTA, “the ability to measurably demonstrate objective results is critical in the pursuit and development of collaborative health care relationships. This will require you to be up-to-date on clinical practice guidelines and protocols as well as to be able to document your adherence to evidence-based practices sufficiently, and share your data with bundle partners.” In other words, whether it’s to become a CJR collaborator or to participate in any one of the other alternative payment models that will be coming down the pipeline, quality data is crucial. (If you’ve been wondering why we’ve spent a lot of time recently writing about outcomes data and our new integrated outcomes tracking tool, this is why. Times are changing; anecdotal evidence isn’t going to cut it anymore.)


For a whole host of other great APTA resources on becoming a CJR collaborator, click here.

  • The Bundle Conundrum: Should PTs Participate in CJR? Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 6 min. read

    The Bundle Conundrum: Should PTs Participate in CJR?

    There a lot of hot topics in health care right now. Among top trending terms like “Affordable Care Act,” “pay-for-performance,” and “value-based care,” you’ve also probably heard “Medicare bundled payments”—specifically, “CJR” (or Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement ). It’s a new bundled payment model from CMS, and it is of particular importance to outpatient rehab providers. As this article explains, “CJR will support better care for patients who are undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgeries—the two …

  • Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments Image

    articleMay 4, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments

    It’s official: rehab therapists are just a sashay away from exiting the PQRS dance floor. That’s because last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed final rule that, if adopted, will put into effect the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). And that, in turn, will give the green light to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , a brand spankin’-new quality data reporting program that consolidates PQRS , …

  • CPT Update: Why the Valuation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes is Problematic Image

    articleJul 19, 2016 | 9 min. read

    CPT Update: Why the Valuation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes is Problematic

    The purpose of any type of reform is to drive change. And that’s certainly true when it comes to healthcare—and healthcare payment—reform. But, change often comes slowly—and in the wake of Medicare’s recently issued proposed physician fee schedule for 2017 , I have to wonder whether it’ll come too slowly for physical and occupational therapists. That’s because, while the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) voiced its support for replacing the existing CPT codes for physical …

  • Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On Image

    articleDec 6, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On

    If there’s one thing I know about rehab therapists, it’s that we are all very busy people. If your to-do list is anything like mine, it’s growing faster than you can prune it—and has probably expanded onto multiple sheets of paper (or maybe even into multiple notebooks). And regardless of the value associated with each item on the docket, we tend to refer to these tasks as things we “have” to do—not things we “get” to do. …

  • Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes Image

    articleNov 3, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes

    Over the last several years, healthcare providers in general—and rehab therapists, specifically—have been hit with a seemingly constant barrage of regulatory requirements. And the vast majority of these initiatives—PQRS, functional limitation reporting, MPPR, ICD-10, and the like—have either: Had a direct negative impact on our payments, or Forced us to devote extra time to satisfying the criteria of the requirements—with zero compensation for that time. So, it should come as no surprise that the rehab therapy community …

  • Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Halloween may be over, but if you didn’t get your fill of scares, I’ve got the perfect activity for you: reading through 1,401 pages of pure Medicare gobbledygook. Screaming yet? (Or should I check back at around page 500?) I kid, of course; there’s no need for you to slog through this year’s extra meaty Final Rule —which details the Medicare fee schedule and other important Medicare regulatory and reimbursement changes for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and …

  • Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits Image

    articleOct 17, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits

    After months of heated debate and public commentary—much of it coming from physicians who felt they needed more time to prepare themselves to participate in a brand-new quality reporting program—the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on Friday released its final rule on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) . This act, which will go into effect January 1, 2017, reimburses eligible Medicare physicians based on the quality of care they deliver …

  • Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success Image

    downloadSep 28, 2016

    Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other reform efforts have brought forth a renewed emphasis on care coordination at all points along the care continuum—including the period after hospital discharge. As part of this push, new financial incentives and penalties have put healthcare executives at the center of a high-pressure game of tug-of-war in which they must simultaneously improve care quality and reduce costs. Talk about a catch-22. Enter your email address below to download this guide …

  • CMS Can See Clearly Now, Releases PQRS Strategic Vision Image

    articleMay 21, 2015 | 3 min. read

    CMS Can See Clearly Now, Releases PQRS Strategic Vision

    All month long, we’ve talked about the healthcare industry’s rapid evolution from the fee-for-service Stone Age to the pay-for-performance Enlightenment Period. Yes, payment reform is upon us , but don’t take our word for it—take it straight from America's largest payer of healthcare services: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In an effort to “contribute to improved healthcare quality across the nation,” CMS recently published the Physician Quality Reporting Programs Strategic Vision , detailing a …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.