There a lot of hot topics in health care right now. Among top trending terms like “Affordable Care Act,” “pay-for-performance,” and “value-based care,” you’ve also probably heard “Medicare bundled payments”—specifically, “CJR” (or Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement). It’s a new bundled payment model from CMS, and it is of particular importance to outpatient rehab providers.

As this article explains, “CJR will support better care for patients who are undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgeries—the two most common inpatient surgeries for Medicare beneficiaries.” In a nutshell, hospitals participating in CJR are “financially responsible for the quality and cost” of an elective joint replacement episode of care. CMS will award incentives for “greater coordination of care across hospitals, physicians, and post-acute care providers,” including physical therapists.

This summary sounds simple enough, but in reality, CJR is fairly complex. And in order to address whether you, as an outpatient rehab provider, should participate, we must first address that complexity.

Compliance Quest: 7 Medicare Muck-Ups and How to Fix Them - Regular BannerCompliance Quest: 7 Medicare Muck-Ups and How to Fix Them - Small Banner

Who must participate?

CMS implemented the CJR model in 67 geographic areas, which are defined by metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). As this CMS resource explains, “MSAs are counties associated with a core urban area that has a population of at least 50,000.” Non-MSA counties (i.e., those with no urban core area or an urban core area of fewer than 50,000 people) were not eligible for selection. (You can view the 67 geographic areas here.)

Within those 67 areas, hospitals that (1) are not participating in “Model 1 or Models 2 or 4 of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative for LEJR episodes” and (2) are “paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS)” must participate in the CJR model. That amounts to about 800 hospitals.

From a patient participation perspective, beneficiaries must:

  • Have Medicare (Part A or B) as their primary insurance.
  • Not be eligible for Medicare based solely on an end-stage renal disease benefit.
  • Not be enrolled in any managed care plan.
  • Not be covered under a United Mine Workers of America health plan.

How does CJR work?

Per CMS, the episode of care begins when an eligible beneficiary is admitted to a participating hospital. Eligible patients are then ultimately discharged under either:

  • MS-DRG 469: Major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity with major complications or comorbidities, or
  • MS-DRG 470: Major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity without major complications or comorbidities.

The episode concludes 90 days post-discharge and includes “all related items and services paid under Medicare Part A and Part B for all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries,” with the exception of certain exclusions. As you may have guessed, independent outpatient therapy services are part of the related services included in the episode.

Everyone receives payment as they normally do per the Medicare Fee Schedule. However, “every year during the approximate five performance years of this model, CJR hospitals will receive separate episode target prices for MS-DRGs 469 and 470,” states CMS. As Heidi Jannenga points out in her Triumph in the Triple Aim guide, “at the completion of the performance year, the cost of each eligible episode of care is compared to the target price for that hospital. Target prices are determined based on a mix of historical data from the hospital and the region and are updated every two years. Medicare will then apply a payment adjustment—either positive or negative—based on the difference between those two amounts as well as performance quality (i.e., patient outcomes).” A positive calculation means the hospital will receive a reconciliation or incentive payment; a negative one means that “the hospital must pay back some or all of the difference.”

As for the episode target prices, CMS will determine those using a ratio of two-thirds performance to one-third regional comparison in 2016 and 2017. In 2018, that ratio will flip, and for 2019 and 2020, CMS will determine a hospital’s pricing target based entirely on how it ranks in its geographic area—the power of benchmarking, folks.

For a deeper dive into target pricing, Medicare’s payment adjustments, and quality composite scoring, check out this resource (jump to page four).

So, should rehab providers participate in CJR?

According to compliance expert Rick Gawenda’s 2016 Ascend presentation, CJR and Rehab Therapy—How Do We Coexist, CJR allows participating hospitals “to enter into financial arrangements with certain types of providers and suppliers,” including outpatient therapy providers. Those arrangements enable hospitals to share “with these third-party providers and entities (called ‘Collaborators’) the following: reconciliation payments, internal cost savings, and the responsibility for repayment to Medicare.” Of course, these arrangements are subject to limitations outlined in the CJR Final Rule; for example, there’s a limit on how much financial risk a hospital can share with a collaborator. Specifically, the hospital must retain at least 50% of its total risk. Furthermore, the hospital cannot share more than 25% of its responsibility with any single CJR collaborator.

So, as an outpatient rehab provider participating in CJR, you have the opportunity to share in the reward—as well as the risk. That has many therapists in the included geographic areas (yes, you need to be in one of the areas) wondering: should I participate? In his Ascend presentation, Gawenda proposed that pondering providers ask themselves these questions:

  • Do I receive referrals for Medicare beneficiaries who have had THAs or TKRs at a CJR hospital?
    • If yes, how many referrals per month or per year do I receive?
    • And how many visits does that translate into over the course of a calendar year?
  • What is the CJR Hospital CMS Star Rating?
  • Do I know my cost per episode for a THA and TKR patient?
  • Do I collect outcomes data on my THA and TKR patients?
  • Do I know—or am I at least aware of—the other collaborators involved in the care of my participating CJR beneficiaries?
  • Do I know the star ratings of those other collaborators?
  • Do I understand how the total cost of care per beneficiary is calculated?
  • Do I understand how quality measures and quality scores impact target pricing?
  • Do I know if the CJR hospital will perform the optional quality measures?
  • Do I have a healthcare attorney who understands CJR bundling and has my best interests in mind?

Upon answering these questions, you should feel much more confident about your decision to participate—or not. I also recommend checking out the APTA’s contracting checklist. Ultimately, what will prove most influential to your decision are the stories from those outpatient rehabilitation providers already participating. And as that feedback becomes available, we will certainly share it. On that note, if you’re currently participating in CJR, we want to hear from you! Hit us up in the comments section below.

  • Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments Image

    articleMay 4, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments

    It’s official: rehab therapists are just a sashay away from exiting the PQRS dance floor. That’s because last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed final rule that, if adopted, will put into effect the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). And that, in turn, will give the green light to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , a brand spankin’-new quality data reporting program that consolidates PQRS , …

  • What the New HCAHPS Proposal Means for the Future of Hospital-Based PT  Image

    articleAug 11, 2016 | 3 min. read

    What the New HCAHPS Proposal Means for the Future of Hospital-Based PT

    When a patient is in pain, that patient wants relief—fast. And even if the patient knows medication is only a temporary fix—and a potentially dangerous one, at that—he or she will probably still choose drugs over longer-lasting, less-instant treatment options like physical therapy. For healthcare providers beholden to payment structures that incentivize patient satisfaction, that preference presents a real pickle: give the patient what he or she wants—long-term consequences be damned—or risk lower satisfaction scores (and potentially …

  • Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits Image

    articleOct 17, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits

    After months of heated debate and public commentary—much of it coming from physicians who felt they needed more time to prepare themselves to participate in a brand-new quality reporting program—the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on Friday released its final rule on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) . This act, which will go into effect January 1, 2017, reimburses eligible Medicare physicians based on the quality of care they deliver …

  • America’s Next Top Payment Model: The Move to Pay-for-Quality Image

    articleMay 11, 2015 | 9 min. read

    America’s Next Top Payment Model: The Move to Pay-for-Quality

    Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to provide higher-quality care at a lower cost. With the healthcare industry’s fast-moving transition to value-based —rather than service-based—payment systems, that’s the challenge many providers are facing. And while that mission may very well seem impossible, the truth is that rehab therapists and their peers in other medical fields don’t really have much of a choice as to whether they’ll accept it. [webform:1307:yellow inline] The winds of change …

  • Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Halloween may be over, but if you didn’t get your fill of scares, I’ve got the perfect activity for you: reading through 1,401 pages of pure Medicare gobbledygook. Screaming yet? (Or should I check back at around page 500?) I kid, of course; there’s no need for you to slog through this year’s extra meaty Final Rule —which details the Medicare fee schedule and other important Medicare regulatory and reimbursement changes for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and …

  • CMS Can See Clearly Now, Releases PQRS Strategic Vision Image

    articleMay 21, 2015 | 3 min. read

    CMS Can See Clearly Now, Releases PQRS Strategic Vision

    All month long, we’ve talked about the healthcare industry’s rapid evolution from the fee-for-service Stone Age to the pay-for-performance Enlightenment Period. Yes, payment reform is upon us , but don’t take our word for it—take it straight from America's largest payer of healthcare services: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In an effort to “contribute to improved healthcare quality across the nation,” CMS recently published the Physician Quality Reporting Programs Strategic Vision , detailing a …

  • Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes Image

    articleNov 3, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes

    Over the last several years, healthcare providers in general—and rehab therapists, specifically—have been hit with a seemingly constant barrage of regulatory requirements. And the vast majority of these initiatives—PQRS, functional limitation reporting, MPPR, ICD-10, and the like—have either: Had a direct negative impact on our payments, or Forced us to devote extra time to satisfying the criteria of the requirements—with zero compensation for that time. So, it should come as no surprise that the rehab therapy community …

  • Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success Image

    downloadSep 28, 2016

    Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other reform efforts have brought forth a renewed emphasis on care coordination at all points along the care continuum—including the period after hospital discharge. As part of this push, new financial incentives and penalties have put healthcare executives at the center of a high-pressure game of tug-of-war in which they must simultaneously improve care quality and reduce costs. Talk about a catch-22. Enter your email address below to download this guide …

  • Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On Image

    articleDec 6, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On

    If there’s one thing I know about rehab therapists, it’s that we are all very busy people. If your to-do list is anything like mine, it’s growing faster than you can prune it—and has probably expanded onto multiple sheets of paper (or maybe even into multiple notebooks). And regardless of the value associated with each item on the docket, we tend to refer to these tasks as things we “have” to do—not things we “get” to do. …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.