’Tis the CMS season of giving, and that means the 2016 Final Rule is out—thus, it’s time to prepare for PQRS. If it’s your first time reporting, you may be a bit confused by the different reporting options. Don’t worry; we were there once, too. That’s why we did a little—well, a lot—of research and put it all together in an easy-to-understand post (you’re totes welcome). Here’s what we know:

Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Regular BannerTriumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Small Banner

Individual Claims-Based and Individual Registry-Based

For most providers, these two reporting methods are the only available options, so let’s discuss them first:

The Similarities

For both individual claims-based reporting and individual registry-based reporting (both of which WebPT offers), eligible providers (EPs) are subject to these requirements:

  • EPs must report on nine measures across three NQS domains for at least 50% of their Medicare Part B FFS patients.
  • If fewer than nine measures apply, EPs must report on all the measures available to them (up to eight measures) for at least 50% of their Medicare Part B FFS patients.
  • If an EP sees at least one Medicare patient in a billed visit during 2016, then he or she must report on at least one cross-cutting measure, even if fewer than nine measures apply to the EP.
  • When fewer than nine measures covering three NQS domains are reported, EPs are subject to Medicare’s Measures Applicability Validation (MAV) process, which allows Medicare to identify whether an EP should’ve reported quality data codes for additional measures.

The Differences

These two reporting methods differ in only one area: the number of available measures. Here’s the breakdown:

  • Individual Claims-Based
    • PTs: Six measures
    • OTs: Nine measures
    • SLPs: Three measure
  • Individual Registry-Based
    • PTs: Eight measures
    • OTs: Ten measures (Note that there are only nine measures available to OTs within WebPT)
    • SLPs: Three measure

This means that PTs and SLPs will automatically go through the MAV process regardless of the reporting method chosen. OTs, on the other hand, have enough measures applicable to them for both reporting types.

GPRO (Registry Only)

Now, if your clinic has two or more eligible professionals, then you also have one other reporting method to consider: GPRO. No, this isn’t a video recording tool; it’s Medicare’s Group Practice Reporting Option, which has two options for satisfactory reporting:

  1. Report on at least nine measures across three NQS domains for at least 50% of your Medicare Part B FFS patients. (Note that WebPT only offers this option for GPRO reporting.)
  2. Report on six measures across two NQS domains, and complete a CAHPS survey. (Please note that this survey is required for groups with 100 or more eligible professionals.)

As with the first two reporting options, EPs who report via GPRO are subject to these requirements:

  • If fewer than nine (or six) measures apply, your group must report on all the measures available to you (up to eight measures) for at least 50% of your Medicare Part B FFS patients.
  • When fewer than nine (or six) measures covering three NQS domains are reported, the group practice is subject to the MAV process, which allows Medicare to identify whether a group practice should have reported quality data codes for additional measures. So, if your group consists of only SLPs, it’ll automatically go through the MAV process—which includes a review of cross-cutting measure applicability.
  • If your group sees at least one Medicare patient in a billed visit during 2016, the group must report on at least one cross-cutting measure.

But, wait just a tick: I know I said there were only two options, but that wasn’t totally true. Groups with 25 or more—but fewer than 99—eligible professionals also can choose to report via the GPRO Web Interface. While CMS has yet to release information regarding any 2016 changes, as far as we can tell, the requirements are the same as last year:

  • Your group must report on all measures included in the Web Interface for your first 248 Medicare Part B patients.
  • If your group has fewer than 248 Medicare patients, it must report on at least one measure for 100% of your Medicare Part B patients.

So, there you have it: the three PQRS reporting options for 2016. One final note: Keep in mind that CMS won’t count any measures with a 0% performance rate, regardless of the reporting method you choose. Like Goldilocks, you might need a try or two to find just the right fit for your practice, but this summary should help narrow down your options. Still feeling unsure—or just want more PQRS information? Don’t miss our upcoming webinar, PQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know, at 9:00 AM PST on December 9, 2015.

  • Here's What PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know About PQRS 2015 Image

    articleNov 13, 2014 | 8 min. read

    Here's What PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know About PQRS 2015

    In the spirit of the season, today we give thanks for Medicare’s brand new Final Rule . Drier than overcooked turkey, we decided to carve up this bird into the most pertinent chunks of Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) information for you and your practice so you don’t have to. Here’s what you need to know about PQRS 2015: Measures, Measures, Measures Medicare likes measures––225 of them to be exact––and they don’t care who knows. Thankfully, all …

  • articleNov 4, 2013 | 3 min. read

    What PQRS Could Look Like in 2014

    On July 19, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register. According to this summary , most of the policies were open for comment until September 6, 2013 and, pending final decisions (which hopefully will occur this month), will take effect on January 1, 2014. The 605-page document contains proposals for policy changes on everything from reimbursements to the …

  • The Scoop on PQRS Image

    articleNov 18, 2013 | 5 min. read

    The Scoop on PQRS

    What is PQRS? The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), which mandates that eligible professionals meet standards for satisfactory reporting. If you are not PQRS-compliant in 2014, CMS will assess penalties. However, we do not yet know what the penalty amount is or how CMS will assess it. There also is a chance that CMS will provide incentive payments for successfully completing PQRS, as they did in 2013. Again, we …

  • articleNov 5, 2013 | 3 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS 2014

    Well, it’s November already, and that means two things: Thanksgiving and Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Sure, PQRS doesn’t involve mouthwatering roasted turkey, savory stuffing, or creamy mashed potatoes, but it has become quite the November tradition for us here at WebPT. You see, this is the time of year that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) typically confirms the details of next year’s reporting requirements, thus allowing us to update our PQRS solution (claims- …

  • GPRO 2015: Is it Worth it? Image

    articleNov 19, 2014 | 4 min. read

    GPRO 2015: Is it Worth it?

    Last week, we covered the registry-and claims-based reporting methods for PQRS. In this post, I’ll discuss the complexities associated with reporting PQRS using the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO). In past years, GPRO seemed to be the most practical option for practices with more than two eligible professionals. This year, however, Medicare added more stipulations to the GPRO program—and in some cases, those add-ons might make the whole thing more trouble than it’s worth. The Basics of …

  • webinarDec 20, 2013

    Preparing for PQRS 2014

    In December, we hosted a webinar focused on the new PQRS regulations. This session broke down all the rules for 2014 to ensure you’ll be prepared to play by them and therefore not incur any penalties. During this presentation, we: Detailed the PQRS requirements for 2014 Described the different reporting methods Explained how you can ensure you successfully report

  • articleNov 7, 2013 | 2 min. read

    FLR and PQRS: How Are They Different?

    Functional limitation reporting (FLR) and PQRS both fall under the ever-widening umbrella of Medicare regulations, and they both involve outcome measures and data codes. Still, they are completely separate requirements, each with its own set of rules. Confusing, we know. To help you sort out the differences, we’ve put together a short breakdown of each one as well as a detailed compare/contrast chart: The Basics of FLR On July 1, 2013, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services …

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. (And be sure to check out this separate PT billing FAQ we recently put together.) Questions …

  • The Rehab Therapist’s Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule Image

    articleNov 4, 2015 | 6 min. read

    The Rehab Therapist’s Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule

    November is finally here, which means we here at WebPT can’t stop thinking about a juicy, flavorful, hot-out-of-the oven—Medicare Final Rule. While your tastebuds probably aren’t jumping with joy over the thought of chewing over a bunch of regulatory gobbledygook, the good news is that this year’s final rule shouldn’t be too tough to swallow (and if it is, you can always add more gravy). We’ve already picked out the most important pieces and served ’em up …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.