ICD-10 Interoperability and youWith everyone who’s covered under HIPAA preparing to transition to ICD-10 on October 1, 2015, there’s a lot of information out there on the both the positive and less-than-positive aspects of the change. One of the main benefits that the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), World Health Organization (WHO), and other healthcare organizations are citing about the new diagnosis codes is improved interoperability—quite the innovative concept. Outside of these massive government groups, though, folks have their reservations. While some argue that ICD-10 will not solve interoperability issues or that interoperability might be possible but it isn’t the goal of ICD-10, one could suggest that improving interoperability predominantly rests, for now, on the people in the trenches—the practitioners, billers, and administrators directly affected by the transition.

What is interoperability?

Interoperability occurs when diverse systems and organizations work together for an overarching goal. In healthcare, interoperability focuses on successful information exchange across all healthcare platforms. Both communication and technology play massively important roles in achieving seamless data exchange.

How would ICD-10 aid interoperability?

The ICD-10 diagnosis code sets are super specific, therefore the data produced will be super specific, too. Furthermore, ICD-10 allows for simplified coding of information, and simple coding is easier to share. Better data + easier sharing = improved interoperability.

Of course, systems have to talk to each other for true interoperability to occur. This is a whole other ball of wax. Technology must evolve to facilitate the seamless and simple exchange of information, and that’s not currently happening consistently across the healthcare spectrum. According to David Shaywitz’s Epic Challenge: What The Emergence of an EMR Giant Means For the Future of Healthcare Innovation, “Any one company’s EMR system isn’t particularly compatible with the EMR system from another company, resulting in—or, more fairly, perpetuating—the Tower of Babel that effectively exists as medical practices often lack the ability to share basic information easily with one another.” As detailed above, ICD-10, helps solve this issue. That and lightweight, agile, and cloud-based EMR systems. After all, another stipulation of true interoperability is constant interconnectivity and communication. We need always-on, web-based systems for that—not the gargantuan, server-based dinosaurs of yesteryear.

Why should we care?

Like I said above, improving—or helping propel the industry toward a truer form of—interoperability depends on the people involved.

In a Healthcare IT News post entitled Will ICD-10 Solve Interoperability Problems?, author John Lynn explains that ICD-10 will hinder, rather than help, interoperability because practitioners will never achieve quality input of diagnosis codes. “All we have to do is look at the current ICD-9 diagnosing patterns...often a doctor gets stuck searching for the right ICD-9 code. Right or wrong, they end up picking a code that may not be exactly the right code for what they’ve seen. Maybe they choose NOS (Not Otherwise Specified) instead of the specific diagnosis that would be more appropriate. Add in the complexity of diagnosis requirements for getting the most out of your insurance billing and I don’t think anyone would disagree with the assertion that ICD-9 code entry is far from accurate.” He goes on to ask how we can possibly get a complex set of ICD-10 codes correct if we’re not getting simple ICD-9 codes right. He furthers the conversation by asking if “garbage data in produces garbage data out” hold true, in terms of interoperability, do you really “want other people’s garbage in [your] system”?

Lynn wrote this article about doctors (and hopefully what he describes above is the exception and not the norm), but his point still applies to rehab therapists. If and when you receive data from a primary care physician, do you want data that’s inaccurate? Most definitely not, just as I’m sure physicians do not want inaccurate information from you. Thus, it’s on all providers to have a higher standard about their data and enter the correct information always.

In another article entitled Chasing the Tail of Interoperability, author Gary Palgon explains that improved interoperability has a great deal to do with communication. He encourages readers to “understand that ‘interoperability’ means more than just ‘connectivity.’ Organizations seldom encounter ongoing challenges with connectivity, yet the language—or semantics—used across different disciplines changes frequently.” Thus, we must ensure that interoperability doesn’t start and stop with ICD-10. When changes occur anywhere in the patient data cycle, we must ensure all systems register and compute those changes. Essentially, we must all speak the same language—at least from a technological standpoint. Like Shaywitz, Palgon believes cloud-based solutions will best facilitate this.

In the meantime, though, whether you work in a hospital or a small private practice, choose the right attitude about ICD-10. The transition will happen, and rather than fear or resist the inevitable, you and your clinic should prepare. That way when the switch occurs, your clinic is putting its best foot forward in terms of effective communication and correct data. If we all make this effort, hopefully those best feet will get us stepping in the right interoperability direction.

WebPT + Billing Software - Regular BannerWebPT + Billing Software - Small Banner
  • articleOct 15, 2013 | 3 min. read

    ICD-10 Checklist for Your Practice

    We’ve given you a lot of ICD-10 info to process this month. And in case you haven’t noticed, our main mantra has been “prepare, prepare, prepare.” Because like Confucius, we firmly believe that “success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure.” (And considering he’s the man behind one of the most influential movements in Asian history—not to mention the author of all five Chinese Classics—we’re thinking this Confucius guy gives …

  • ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: What are External Cause Codes, and Do I Have to Use Them? Image

    articleNov 6, 2015 | 1 min. read

    ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: What are External Cause Codes, and Do I Have to Use Them?

    In the latest installment of our ICD-10 Talk series, Dr. Heidi Jannenga clears up the rumors surrounding external cause codes. Found in chapter 20 of the ICD-10 code set, external cause codes provide contextual details about a patient’s injury or condition. Still confused about whether you need to use these codes—and how to do so appropriately? Check out this video, and be sure to stay tuned to the WebPT Blog for all of the latest ICD-10 news …

  • The PT's Guide to Billing Image

    downloadJun 7, 2016

    The PT's Guide to Billing

    When it comes to physical therapy billing, you have to know your stuff—because even the simplest mistakes can cause denials. Of course, knowing billing backwards and forwards doesn’t have to be complicated. That’s why we created a comprehensive billing resource specifically for PTs. Take the guesswork out of billing. Enter your email address below, and we’ll send your free guide.

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part Three Image

    articleOct 20, 2015 | 16 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part Three

    In the movie world, threequels have a reputation for failing to match the glory of their predecessors (The Hangover Part III, anyone?). It’s almost like the writers know they’re out of material, but instead of knowing when to fold ’em, they continue to hold ’em—right up until the inevitable flop. But with ICD-10, the questions just keep getting better—which means the third and latest installment of our ICD-10 FAQ is even juicier than the last. So, grab …

  • Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum Image

    articleAug 18, 2018 | 34 min. read

    Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum

    Last week, WebPT’s trio of billing experts—Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, WebPT President and Co-founder; John Wallace, PT, MS, WebPT Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management; and Dianne Jewell, PT, DPT, PhD, WebPT Director of Clinical Practice, Outcomes, and Education—hosted a live open forum on physical therapy billing . Before the webinar, we challenged registrants to serve up their trickiest PT billing head-scratchers—and boy, did they deliver! We received literally hundreds of questions on …

  • Understanding the ICD-10 Code Structure Image

    articleOct 29, 2013 | 7 min. read

    Understanding the ICD-10 Code Structure

    The leap from ICD-9 to ICD-10 is a big one, so it’s easy to feel a bit overwhelmed. However, you can better digest the codes if you understand their structure. Let’s break it down. The Usual Cast of Characters Codes in the ICD-10-CM code set can have three, four, five, six, or seven characters. Many three-character codes are used as headings for categories of codes; these three-character codes can further expand to four, five, or six characters …

  • This Week in PT News, June 12 Image

    articleJun 12, 2015 | 2 min. read

    This Week in PT News, June 12

    New Study Reveals Why Some Indigenous Cultures Don’t Experience Back Pain According to NPR, California acupuncturist Esther Gokhale recently conducted an investigation into the factors that might explain why some indigenous cultures don’t experience low back pain. Like 75% of Americans, Gokhale has experienced back pain, and she wasn’t convinced Western medicine could cure her ailment. So, she spent ten years visiting and studying populations that report having little to no back pain. She noticed that while …

  • ICD-10 Coding Example: Occupational Therapy Image

    articleAug 20, 2015 | 3 min. read

    ICD-10 Coding Example: Occupational Therapy

    Oh, ICD-10, let me count the ways I love thee. Okay, so maybe you’re not going to wax poetic about the World Health Organization’s updated—and much larger—International Classification of Diseases, but switching to a new code set isn’t the end of the world, either. After all, just because something (ahem, ICD-9) is familiar, it doesn’t mean it’s the best option. In fact, when it comes to code sets,  bigger is better . But that also means there’s …

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part 4 Image

    articleNov 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part 4

    Like the many Land Before Time sequels, the versions of our ICD-10 FAQ keep on-a-comin’. But—unlike those beloved dinosaur tales—I don’t anticipate 12 more versions (plus a TV series) will be necessary to cover what’s to come with ICD-10. Still, the questions continue to roll in—albeit a bit slower than they did a couple of months ago. However, most of the inquiries we’ve received in recent weeks have been super specific. That’s why, our most recent webinar—the …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.