ICD-10 Interoperability and youWith everyone who’s covered under HIPAA preparing to transition to ICD-10 on October 1, 2015, there’s a lot of information out there on the both the positive and less-than-positive aspects of the change. One of the main benefits that the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), World Health Organization (WHO), and other healthcare organizations are citing about the new diagnosis codes is improved interoperability—quite the innovative concept. Outside of these massive government groups, though, folks have their reservations. While some argue that ICD-10 will not solve interoperability issues or that interoperability might be possible but it isn’t the goal of ICD-10, one could suggest that improving interoperability predominantly rests, for now, on the people in the trenches—the practitioners, billers, and administrators directly affected by the transition.

What is interoperability?

Interoperability occurs when diverse systems and organizations work together for an overarching goal. In healthcare, interoperability focuses on successful information exchange across all healthcare platforms. Both communication and technology play massively important roles in achieving seamless data exchange.

How would ICD-10 aid interoperability?

The ICD-10 diagnosis code sets are super specific, therefore the data produced will be super specific, too. Furthermore, ICD-10 allows for simplified coding of information, and simple coding is easier to share. Better data + easier sharing = improved interoperability.

Of course, systems have to talk to each other for true interoperability to occur. This is a whole other ball of wax. Technology must evolve to facilitate the seamless and simple exchange of information, and that’s not currently happening consistently across the healthcare spectrum. According to David Shaywitz’s Epic Challenge: What The Emergence of an EMR Giant Means For the Future of Healthcare Innovation, “Any one company’s EMR system isn’t particularly compatible with the EMR system from another company, resulting in—or, more fairly, perpetuating—the Tower of Babel that effectively exists as medical practices often lack the ability to share basic information easily with one another.” As detailed above, ICD-10, helps solve this issue. That and lightweight, agile, and cloud-based EMR systems. After all, another stipulation of true interoperability is constant interconnectivity and communication. We need always-on, web-based systems for that—not the gargantuan, server-based dinosaurs of yesteryear.

Why should we care?

Like I said above, improving—or helping propel the industry toward a truer form of—interoperability depends on the people involved.

In a Healthcare IT News post entitled Will ICD-10 Solve Interoperability Problems?, author John Lynn explains that ICD-10 will hinder, rather than help, interoperability because practitioners will never achieve quality input of diagnosis codes. “All we have to do is look at the current ICD-9 diagnosing patterns...often a doctor gets stuck searching for the right ICD-9 code. Right or wrong, they end up picking a code that may not be exactly the right code for what they’ve seen. Maybe they choose NOS (Not Otherwise Specified) instead of the specific diagnosis that would be more appropriate. Add in the complexity of diagnosis requirements for getting the most out of your insurance billing and I don’t think anyone would disagree with the assertion that ICD-9 code entry is far from accurate.” He goes on to ask how we can possibly get a complex set of ICD-10 codes correct if we’re not getting simple ICD-9 codes right. He furthers the conversation by asking if “garbage data in produces garbage data out” hold true, in terms of interoperability, do you really “want other people’s garbage in [your] system”?

Lynn wrote this article about doctors (and hopefully what he describes above is the exception and not the norm), but his point still applies to rehab therapists. If and when you receive data from a primary care physician, do you want data that’s inaccurate? Most definitely not, just as I’m sure physicians do not want inaccurate information from you. Thus, it’s on all providers to have a higher standard about their data and enter the correct information always.

In another article entitled Chasing the Tail of Interoperability, author Gary Palgon explains that improved interoperability has a great deal to do with communication. He encourages readers to “understand that ‘interoperability’ means more than just ‘connectivity.’ Organizations seldom encounter ongoing challenges with connectivity, yet the language—or semantics—used across different disciplines changes frequently.” Thus, we must ensure that interoperability doesn’t start and stop with ICD-10. When changes occur anywhere in the patient data cycle, we must ensure all systems register and compute those changes. Essentially, we must all speak the same language—at least from a technological standpoint. Like Shaywitz, Palgon believes cloud-based solutions will best facilitate this.

In the meantime, though, whether you work in a hospital or a small private practice, choose the right attitude about ICD-10. The transition will happen, and rather than fear or resist the inevitable, you and your clinic should prepare. That way when the switch occurs, your clinic is putting its best foot forward in terms of effective communication and correct data. If we all make this effort, hopefully those best feet will get us stepping in the right interoperability direction.

Unwrapping MIPS and the Final Rule: How to Prepare for 2019 - Regular BannerUnwrapping MIPS and the Final Rule: How to Prepare for 2019 - Small Banner
  • Understanding the ICD-10 Code Structure Image

    articleOct 29, 2013 | 7 min. read

    Understanding the ICD-10 Code Structure

    The leap from ICD-9 to ICD-10 is a big one, so it’s easy to feel a bit overwhelmed. However, you can better digest the codes if you understand their structure. Let’s break it down. The Usual Cast of Characters Codes in the ICD-10-CM code set can have three, four, five, six, or seven characters. Many three-character codes are used as headings for categories of codes; these three-character codes can further expand to four, five, or six characters …

  • ICD-9 vs. ICD-10: What’s the Difference? Image

    articleOct 2, 2013 | 3 min. read

    ICD-9 vs. ICD-10: What’s the Difference?

    If you’re a proponent of the old, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” mentality, you might be a little reluctant to buy into all of this ICD-10 business . After all, you use ICD-9 now, and that seems to be working just fine. So why rock the boat? Well, there’s another old saying that goes something like, “You don’t know what you’re missing until you reach out and touch it.” In this case, those still clinging …

  • Top Regulatory Changes of 2014 Image

    articleDec 22, 2014 | 3 min. read

    Top Regulatory Changes of 2014

    Ch-ch-ch-changes : We’ve seen a plethora of regulatory changes this year in the PT space—from the ICD-10 delay to the therapy cap increase. Although some of these legislative twists and turns have caused headaches for therapists, others have been hugely positive. For instance, some form of direct access is now available in all 50 states as well as Washington, DC, and the US Virgin Islands. Read on to learn this year’s top regulatory changes. Regulatory Heavy-Hitters of …

  • What’s Your ICD-10 IQ? [Edit] Image

    articleAug 10, 2015 | 1 min. read

    What’s Your ICD-10 IQ? [Edit]

    For months, we’ve gone on and on about ICD-10 testing: testing your coding processes, testing your software, and testing with your payers. Now, with under two months to go before the transition date, it’s time to test one more very important factor: yourself. After all, no matter how sophisticated your systems and software are, critical thinking—and more importantly, clinical judgment—will make or break your ICD-10 success.   Think you’re an ICD-10 Einstein? Take our quiz to prove …

  • In a Multiple-Code State of Mind: Why One ICD-10 Code Might Not be Enough Image

    articleSep 17, 2015 | 6 min. read

    In a Multiple-Code State of Mind: Why One ICD-10 Code Might Not be Enough

    You’ve probably heard the saying, “A picture is worth a thousand words.” The same logic applies to ICD-10 coding—albeit in a less extreme manner. While you probably won’t need a thousand ICD-10 codes to paint a complete picture of a patient’s diagnosis, there’s a good chance you’ll need more than one—and for many rehab therapists, that represents a huge departure from the coding status quo. With that in mind, here are a few tips for using a …

  • ICD-10 Quick Clips: How to Find the Correct Diagnosis Code Image

    articleJul 24, 2015 | 1 min. read

    ICD-10 Quick Clips: How to Find the Correct Diagnosis Code

     The ICD-10 code set might seem really big and scary, but I like to think of coding in ICD-10 the same way I think about driving around a big city. As long as you know the street system and the general layout, you shouldn’t have too much trouble getting to the right address. Check out this video to learn the basic process of navigating to the right diagnosis code in the ICD-10 code set. [webform:1362:inline yellow]

  • ICD-10: Fact or Fiction Image

    articleApr 3, 2014 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10: Fact or Fiction

    As with any major change, the rumor mill churns at a mighty pace. With all the hearsay, telephone games, and disbursement of misinformation, it’s easy for the myths to swallow the truth. No worries, though; we’re here to sort the fact from the fiction. Fiction: Coders will spend an overwhelming amount of time dealing with external cause codes. Fact: From being struck by an orca to getting injured while crocheting, Chapter 20 of the ICD-10-CM Manual , …

  • The PT's Guide to Billing Image

    downloadJun 7, 2016

    The PT's Guide to Billing

    When it comes to physical therapy billing, you have to know your stuff—because even the simplest mistakes can cause denials. Of course, knowing billing backwards and forwards doesn’t have to be complicated. That’s why we created a comprehensive billing resource specifically for PTs. Take the guesswork out of billing. Enter your email address below, and we’ll send your free guide.

  • ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: How Many ICD-10 Codes Do I Really Need to Know? Image

    articleOct 30, 2015 | 1 min. read

    ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: How Many ICD-10 Codes Do I Really Need to Know?

    In this edition of our ICD-10 Talk series, Dr. Heidi Jannenga explains why rehab therapy practitioners don’t need to know every single code in the ICD-10 code set and how they can adapt their ICD-9 strategies to ensure success with ICD-10. Still experiencing ICD-10 transitional hiccups? Stay tuned to the WebPT Blog for all the latest updates on the new code set. If you have any questions, leave ’em in the comment section of this—or any other—post, …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.