ICD-10 Interoperability and youWith everyone who’s covered under HIPAA preparing to transition to ICD-10 on October 1, 2015, there’s a lot of information out there on the both the positive and less-than-positive aspects of the change. One of the main benefits that the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), World Health Organization (WHO), and other healthcare organizations are citing about the new diagnosis codes is improved interoperability—quite the innovative concept. Outside of these massive government groups, though, folks have their reservations. While some argue that ICD-10 will not solve interoperability issues or that interoperability might be possible but it isn’t the goal of ICD-10, one could suggest that improving interoperability predominantly rests, for now, on the people in the trenches—the practitioners, billers, and administrators directly affected by the transition.

What is interoperability?

Interoperability occurs when diverse systems and organizations work together for an overarching goal. In healthcare, interoperability focuses on successful information exchange across all healthcare platforms. Both communication and technology play massively important roles in achieving seamless data exchange.

How would ICD-10 aid interoperability?

The ICD-10 diagnosis code sets are super specific, therefore the data produced will be super specific, too. Furthermore, ICD-10 allows for simplified coding of information, and simple coding is easier to share. Better data + easier sharing = improved interoperability.

Of course, systems have to talk to each other for true interoperability to occur. This is a whole other ball of wax. Technology must evolve to facilitate the seamless and simple exchange of information, and that’s not currently happening consistently across the healthcare spectrum. According to David Shaywitz’s Epic Challenge: What The Emergence of an EMR Giant Means For the Future of Healthcare Innovation, “Any one company’s EMR system isn’t particularly compatible with the EMR system from another company, resulting in—or, more fairly, perpetuating—the Tower of Babel that effectively exists as medical practices often lack the ability to share basic information easily with one another.” As detailed above, ICD-10, helps solve this issue. That and lightweight, agile, and cloud-based EMR systems. After all, another stipulation of true interoperability is constant interconnectivity and communication. We need always-on, web-based systems for that—not the gargantuan, server-based dinosaurs of yesteryear.

Why should we care?

Like I said above, improving—or helping propel the industry toward a truer form of—interoperability depends on the people involved.

In a Healthcare IT News post entitled Will ICD-10 Solve Interoperability Problems?, author John Lynn explains that ICD-10 will hinder, rather than help, interoperability because practitioners will never achieve quality input of diagnosis codes. “All we have to do is look at the current ICD-9 diagnosing patterns...often a doctor gets stuck searching for the right ICD-9 code. Right or wrong, they end up picking a code that may not be exactly the right code for what they’ve seen. Maybe they choose NOS (Not Otherwise Specified) instead of the specific diagnosis that would be more appropriate. Add in the complexity of diagnosis requirements for getting the most out of your insurance billing and I don’t think anyone would disagree with the assertion that ICD-9 code entry is far from accurate.” He goes on to ask how we can possibly get a complex set of ICD-10 codes correct if we’re not getting simple ICD-9 codes right. He furthers the conversation by asking if “garbage data in produces garbage data out” hold true, in terms of interoperability, do you really “want other people’s garbage in [your] system”?

Lynn wrote this article about doctors (and hopefully what he describes above is the exception and not the norm), but his point still applies to rehab therapists. If and when you receive data from a primary care physician, do you want data that’s inaccurate? Most definitely not, just as I’m sure physicians do not want inaccurate information from you. Thus, it’s on all providers to have a higher standard about their data and enter the correct information always.

In another article entitled Chasing the Tail of Interoperability, author Gary Palgon explains that improved interoperability has a great deal to do with communication. He encourages readers to “understand that ‘interoperability’ means more than just ‘connectivity.’ Organizations seldom encounter ongoing challenges with connectivity, yet the language—or semantics—used across different disciplines changes frequently.” Thus, we must ensure that interoperability doesn’t start and stop with ICD-10. When changes occur anywhere in the patient data cycle, we must ensure all systems register and compute those changes. Essentially, we must all speak the same language—at least from a technological standpoint. Like Shaywitz, Palgon believes cloud-based solutions will best facilitate this.

In the meantime, though, whether you work in a hospital or a small private practice, choose the right attitude about ICD-10. The transition will happen, and rather than fear or resist the inevitable, you and your clinic should prepare. That way when the switch occurs, your clinic is putting its best foot forward in terms of effective communication and correct data. If we all make this effort, hopefully those best feet will get us stepping in the right interoperability direction.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner
  • articleOct 15, 2013 | 3 min. read

    ICD-10 Checklist for Your Practice

    We’ve given you a lot of ICD-10 info to process this month. And in case you haven’t noticed, our main mantra has been “prepare, prepare, prepare.” Because like Confucius, we firmly believe that “success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure.” (And considering he’s the man behind one of the most influential movements in Asian history—not to mention the author of all five Chinese Classics—we’re thinking this Confucius guy gives …

  • The PT's Guide to Billing Image

    downloadJun 7, 2016

    The PT's Guide to Billing

    When it comes to physical therapy billing, you have to know your stuff—because even the simplest mistakes can cause denials. Of course, knowing billing backwards and forwards doesn’t have to be complicated. That’s why we created a comprehensive billing resource specifically for PTs. Take the guesswork out of billing. Enter your email address below, and we’ll send your free guide.

  • Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum Image

    articleAug 18, 2018 | 34 min. read

    Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum

    Last week, WebPT’s trio of billing experts—Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, WebPT President and Co-founder; John Wallace, PT, MS, WebPT Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management; and Dianne Jewell, PT, DPT, PhD, WebPT Director of Clinical Practice, Outcomes, and Education—hosted a live open forum on physical therapy billing . Before the webinar, we challenged registrants to serve up their trickiest PT billing head-scratchers—and boy, did they deliver! We received literally hundreds of questions on …

  • articleJan 23, 2014 | 4 min. read

    Five Reasons Why ICD-10 Isn’t All Doom and Gloom

    The transition to the Tenth Revision to the International Classification of Diseases—a.k.a. ICD-10—is one of the biggest challenges facing the medical community this year. Actually, it’s one of the biggest challenges of the last 30 years, because that’s how long it’s been since ICD got a makeover of this magnitude. Starting October 1, 2015, virtually all medical providers in the US must use diagnosis codes from this brand new code set. Otherwise, they won’t get paid. Oh …

  • ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: Why ICD-10? Image

    articleSep 4, 2015 | 1 min. read

    ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: Why ICD-10?

    In the first video of our ICD-10 Talk video series, Dr. Heidi Jannenga provided a general overview of ICD-10 and how it differs from ICD-9. In this week’s video, Heidi details some of the limitations of ICD-9 and explains why the transition to ICD-10 is necessary. She also offers clarification on a common point of confusion: does the switch go by date of claim submission or date of service? Watch now to find out, and stay tuned …

  • It’s an ICD-10 Thanksgiving Image

    articleNov 18, 2015 | 3 min. read

    It’s an ICD-10 Thanksgiving

    Ah, Thanksgiving: that wonderful day of the year when loved ones gather together to give thanks for the #blessings in their lives. But the day doesn’t always go according to plan; thankfully, ICD-10 is here to help us code for holiday havoc: Y93.61, Activity, American tackle football A friendly game in the backyard to kick off the holiday? Not so much—at least not when you’re dealing with Z63.1, Problems in relationship with the in-laws. Your brother-in-law tackles …

  • ICD-10 Coding Example: Speech-Language Pathology Image

    articleAug 21, 2015 | 3 min. read

    ICD-10 Coding Example: Speech-Language Pathology

    We’re only six weeks away from October 1, 2015, and you know what that means: ICD-10 is almost here. We’re  super excited  for the transition to ICD-10, but that doesn’t mean the new code set is a snap to learn. In fact, it’s pretty darn tough; we know that. So, to further assist you in your preparation efforts, we’ve put together this helpful SLP-specific example of how to code using ICD-10: Autistic disorder The Patient The patient …

  • Understanding the ICD-10 Code Structure Image

    articleOct 29, 2013 | 7 min. read

    Understanding the ICD-10 Code Structure

    The leap from ICD-9 to ICD-10 is a big one, so it’s easy to feel a bit overwhelmed. However, you can better digest the codes if you understand their structure. Let’s break it down. The Usual Cast of Characters Codes in the ICD-10-CM code set can have three, four, five, six, or seven characters. Many three-character codes are used as headings for categories of codes; these three-character codes can further expand to four, five, or six characters …

  • ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: What’s the Deal with Auto Insurances? Image

    articleOct 1, 2015 | 1 min. read

    ICD-10 Talk with Dr. Heidi Jannenga: What’s the Deal with Auto Insurances?

    In this edition of ICD-10 Talk, Dr. Heidi Jannenga explains why some payers aren’t required to make the switch to ICD-10 this week. Wondering which payers aren’t subject to the transition mandate? Watch now to find out, and stay tuned to the WebPT Blog for more great ICD-10 videos throughout the month.

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.