As Occupational Therapy Month comes to a close, it’s a good time to consider all of the pending changes in health care and how they will affect our field. Soon, healthcare providers will be reimbursed for their services in very different ways: new payment models will be driven by data demonstrating effective care, and ICD-10 codes—which serve as one method for gathering such quality data—will be scrutinized to determine what types of people are consuming health care and how they’re faring as a result. Thus, occupational therapists who master this new code set can use it to improve patient outcomes and underscore the cost-effective benefits of their services.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner

Where We Came From

In 1996, I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in occupational therapy. The Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) payment methodology was new, and lump-sum payments for inpatient hospital stays were doled out based on a patient’s diagnosis. Aside from DRGs, no other sector of health care had to consider cost when providing care. In fact, the fee-for-service model encouraged overutilization of services without consideration of patient outcomes.

At that time, health care felt very much like the Wild West. Each provider was running his or her own show, and coordination of care was an aspirational concept. Often, including occupational therapy in the plan of care was an afterthought—if it happened at all. I often felt like I was designing patient treatment plans in a vacuum, and I questioned how much I was able to help those patients in this manner.

In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act introduced a new, comprehensive focus on patients. The Affordable Care Act recognized that many diseases—such as obesity and adult onset diabetes—require a preventive approach. This new perspective on health care paved the way for the Triple Aim’s objectives of improving access, care, and health, while lowering costs. However, better, more cost-effective care requires new payment models, which demand critical changes in provider behavior. Communication and collaboration with an eye toward cost is no longer optional—it’s now a crucial component of provider and patient success.

Where We’re Heading

New payment models reimburse for value as opposed to volume. The old fee-for-service model  eventually may be entirely replaced with the Merit Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), which cobbles together the best parts of the Physician Quality Reporting System, the Value Based Payment Modifier, and the Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program into a reimbursement model that focuses on quality care, sharing electronic information, and evidence-based practice. Another part of payment reform, Alternative Payment Models (APMs), will bundle payments and encourage providers along the care continuum to share those payments as well as financial risk tied to lack of patient improvement. Providers delivering cost-effective, quality care that improves patient outcomes will benefit by sharing the savings. APMs include Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), Patient-Centered Medical Homes, and bundled payments for specific services, such as joint replacements.

That being said, payment reform can only be effective through analysis of quality data. ICD-10 is a way for payers—including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),—to scrutinize data and drive reform. Therefore, it’s critical for occupational therapists to fully understand ICD-10 so they can use codes that paint a comprehensive picture of the patients they are treating. ICD-10 codes allow us to fully, accurately, and specifically communicate the complexity of each patient, underscore the value of occupational therapy, and justify our treatment plans. However, old habits die hard , and busy OTs may be tempted to rely on what worked in the past.

I am guilty of these bad habits. In the past, I memorized a few ICD-9 codes and applied them broadly to a range of patients. I wasn’t alone in this practice. Most clinics and rehabilitation departments had a weathered Post-it note with their go-to ICD-9 codes taped to a computer monitor. But this technique only worked because ICD-9 lacked specificity, leaving providers with limited choices.

With ICD-10, occupational therapists should resist the urge to replace those tattered Post-it notes with  ICD-10 crosswalks, or worse—tape up fresh notes with the code M62.82 (Generalized Weakness). These bad habits will fail us by undermining the value of our services. By using non-specific codes—or not enough codes—we could harm our patients, who may be denied continued services because we did not demonstrate the complexity of their care.

The Power of Occupational Therapy—and ICD-10

Think of your most complicated patient and the impact your occupational therapy plan of care had on that patient’s outcomes. What if your patient was a young woman with brittle diabetes who suffered from low vision, poor balance after several toe amputations, and severe muscle atrophy and neuropathy that impeded her ability to use her hands? Maybe she lives alone, has a small business, and is very active in the community. Her goal is to return to her home and her life, but her most recent fall has left her severely incapacitated. As occupational therapists, we are well equipped to help patients like this young woman achieve their goals. No challenge is too great—unless the payer stops paying because you only coded for“Generalized Muscle Weakness” on your initial evaluation, which did not justify your plan of care for four weeks of therapy to address a variety of complex issues, including low vision and safety needs.

It’s not difficult to see how ICD-10 codes will not only improve patient outcomes, but also demonstrate occupational therapy’s critical role in achieving the Triple Aim’s objectives. We are uniquely trained to (1) identify the factors limiting a person’s ability to engage in his or her occupational roles and (2) develop strategies for returning that person to those roles. Occupational therapists have been thinking about external causes long before ICD-10 stuck a code on it. We asked why our patient was trapped in the bathtub for three days before help arrived or how our patient ran her power wheelchair into the side of a parked car. These factors guided our plans of care and helped us help our patients. Consistently selecting the most specific codes helps us paint a clear picture of our patients and explain why occupational therapy is a critical factor in improving each patient’s outcomes.

So, as April winds down, rip up those notes with your go-to codes,and make a commitment to master ICD-10. First, develop a plan to identify the most specific codes in the shortest amount of time. And don’t be afraid to use all of the tools available to help you get the job done. Here are a few tips and tricks:

While I would never suggest that you rely on a crosswalking tool for determining the right code to use, you can use one—like this one for AOTA members—to help you get familiar with the ICD-10 code set.
Websites such as ICD-10Data.com can help you  visually map the ICD-10 CM code set and drill down into specific areas.
I also recommend keeping a Word document with some of your most commonly used codes as well as PDF copies of the Alphabetic Index, Tabular Index, and the CDC’s ICD-10 CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting saved to your laptop.


When the time comes to use M62.82—and at some point it will—you’ll feel good about it, because you’ll know that it really does tie in with your treatment plan and reflect your patient’s deficits. Only an occupational therapist who’s mastered ICD-10 could.

  • Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On Image

    articleDec 6, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On

    If there’s one thing I know about rehab therapists, it’s that we are all very busy people. If your to-do list is anything like mine, it’s growing faster than you can prune it—and has probably expanded onto multiple sheets of paper (or maybe even into multiple notebooks). And regardless of the value associated with each item on the docket, we tend to refer to these tasks as things we “have” to do—not things we “get” to do. …

  • Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments Image

    articleMay 4, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments

    It’s official: rehab therapists are just a sashay away from exiting the PQRS dance floor. That’s because last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed final rule that, if adopted, will put into effect the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). And that, in turn, will give the green light to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , a brand spankin’-new quality data reporting program that consolidates PQRS , …

  • Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits Image

    articleOct 17, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits

    After months of heated debate and public commentary—much of it coming from physicians who felt they needed more time to prepare themselves to participate in a brand-new quality reporting program—the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on Friday released its final rule on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) . This act, which will go into effect January 1, 2017, reimburses eligible Medicare physicians based on the quality of care they deliver …

  • Cloudy with a Chance of Reform: 5 Key Healthcare Forecasts for 2017 Image

    webinarJan 5, 2017

    Cloudy with a Chance of Reform: 5 Key Healthcare Forecasts for 2017

    Predicting the weather is tough—just ask any meteorologist who has called for sun on the day of a major downpour. Well, predicting the fate of the US healthcare system isn’t much easier—there’s a lot up in the air, after all. But, even without a healthcare equivalent of Doppler Radar, there are a few key trends that are sure to have a major impact on PTs, OTs, and SLPs in 2017 and beyond. And to keep your practice …

  • Common Questions from our Cloudy with a Chance of Reform Webinar Image

    articleFeb 13, 2017 | 13 min. read

    Common Questions from our Cloudy with a Chance of Reform Webinar

    In our first webinar of 2017 , WebPT’s co-founder and president, Heidi Jannenga, teamed up with CEO Nancy Ham to discuss the current and future healthcare trends that will impact PTs, OTs, and SLPs. (Missed it? No worries; you can view the complete recording here .) As always, we received quite a few questions during the presentation—way more than we could address live. So, we’ve put them all here, in one handy Q&A doc. Scroll through and …

  • Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Halloween may be over, but if you didn’t get your fill of scares, I’ve got the perfect activity for you: reading through 1,401 pages of pure Medicare gobbledygook. Screaming yet? (Or should I check back at around page 500?) I kid, of course; there’s no need for you to slog through this year’s extra meaty Final Rule —which details the Medicare fee schedule and other important Medicare regulatory and reimbursement changes for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and …

  • Goodbye, Grace: CMS Ends ICD-10 Flexibility Period Image

    articleOct 5, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Goodbye, Grace: CMS Ends ICD-10 Flexibility Period

    As healthcare providers say “goodbye” to the month of September, they’ll have to say “ hello ” to more than just cooler temps and the beginning of a new season. That’s because, as of October 1, 2016, Medicare’s ICD-10 grace period is officially over. That means if providers continue to submit unspecified codes when other, more specific codes exist, Medicare will start saying “no” to paying for those claims. Feeling a bit underprepared for this change? Here’s …

  • articleSep 6, 2011 | 3 min. read

    CMS, Patient Level Data and Outcomes: What should we be measuring?

    What should we be measuring? Recently, there has been some debate from EMR providers over the type of data that should be provided to CMS when reporting clinical outcomes. CMS, in a newly proposed rule, wants to define and begin to use a new measure called CQM . CQM stands for Clinical Quality Measure and is used to establish the top tier providers for the effectiveness and necessity of specific treatments.   The Issue The issue here …

  • Outcomes and OMT FAQ Image

    articleApr 26, 2016 | 11 min. read

    Outcomes and OMT FAQ

    In January, we hosted a webinar focused on the importance of outcomes tracking in physical therapy. In addition to explaining why it’s absolutely critical that therapists collect objective data on patient progress, we highlighted a few of the reports available in WebPT Outcomes . With the move to a value-based payment environment already in full swing, outcomes tracking is a hot topic in the physical therapy space, and that meant lots of thoughtful question from our webinar …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.