When I heard that the California legislature not only passed AB 1000, but did so by a landslide vote of 72-0, I was more than a little upset. In fact, I am downright angry—and as a member of the rehab therapy community, you should be, too.

Sponsored by the California Physical Therapy Association, this bill essentially trades small gains in direct access for legalization of physician-owned physical therapy services (POPTs).

Specifically, it allows patients to independently seek therapy treatment for a period of 45 days and 12 visits. After that, patients are required to undergo a physician evaluation and plan of care approval.

I think we can all agree that direct access to physical therapy services is good; it can decrease healthcare costs by eliminating unnecessary medical office visits while simultaneously offering patients the quickest, most efficient route to receiving therapy treatment. I am happy that CAPTA leaders recognize the value of direct access enough to push legislation that permits it, but I do not believe those leaders were serving our best interests when they agreed to make concessions in other areas—namely, POPTs—to make a little bit of headway in the fight for direct access. I would not be as frustrated if the bill had passed without quid pro quo.

By legalizing POPTs, the California Assembly has essentially allowed physicians to, in a very literal sense, take ownership of rehab therapy. Giving the green light to POPTs ultimately will result in fewer referrals for independent therapy clinics because physicians will begin referring exclusively to their own therapists—thereby ramping up their own revenue. This is not acceptable. We are not physicians’ musculoskeletal sidekicks, or, in the language of AB 1000, “healing arts professionals.” We’re fully competent, doctorate-level therapists capable of making our own clinical decisions. While I’m sure there are some effective physician-therapist partnerships out there (and I’d be willing to bet those therapists enjoy a high degree of autonomy), overall, I believe this sort of arrangement negatively impacts the therapy industry.

What good is direct access if these POPTs end up running you out of business? How do you expect to get paid for the 12 direct access visits when most payers require diagnosis from a medical professional who is authorized to complete a claim form? (PTs currently don’t fall into that category in most states—we’re fighting that battle with slow, minimal progress.) Considering that physicians can now own PT practices, does it not seem rather coincidental that after a patient reaches the maximum of 12 therapy visits, a PT must refer back to a physician to continue treatment? This only perpetuates the vicious cycle. Plus, POPTs take away therapists’ power to treat as they see fit by forcing them to work under someone else’s control, and that’s detrimental to our ultimate goal of gaining autonomy with direct access. It also undermines our efforts to raise brand awareness for physical therapy as a whole; the brand now becomes even more muddled.  

If the implications of this law don’t alarm you—or worse yet, if you are apathetic toward them or have never even heard of AB1000—then we have serious work to do. Changing the way the general public thinks about rehab therapy—i.e., its value as effective stand-alone treatment—starts with changing the way we think about ourselves and our willingness to be outspoken and fight for our beliefs.

As I read through the forums and posts for and against AB1000, it became increasingly clear that by supporting this bill, the CPTA blatantly misrepresented the interests of its constituency. But who was really out there on the front lines fighting for our profession? There are 26,000 registered PTs in California. However, according to the APTA, only 5,439 of them were CAPTA members as of June 3, 2013. Does that mean that only 20% of PTs in California actually care about what happens in their state? Or perhaps it’s just that California PTs see no reason to waste money paying dues to an organization that doesn’t represent their interests anyway. And honestly, the numbers are not that much different on a national level.

Things are moving fast with national health care reform and the Affordable Care Act set in motion; now, more than ever, is a time to unite and stand our ground before losing more of what we have fought so hard for in years past. We are a diverse group that needs to unite behind a common professional brand that effectively represents all PTs. Together, we can drive our profession forward in a way that promotes our value, relevancy, and the amazing patient outcomes we achieve every day. There is strength in numbers; our voice is louder when everyone shouts at once. 

Down with Denials! 5 Claim Fixes to Make Sure Your PT Clinic Gets Paid - Regular BannerDown with Denials! 5 Claim Fixes to Make Sure Your PT Clinic Gets Paid - Small Banner
  • Top Regulatory Changes of 2014 Image

    articleDec 22, 2014 | 3 min. read

    Top Regulatory Changes of 2014

    Ch-ch-ch-changes : We’ve seen a plethora of regulatory changes this year in the PT space—from the ICD-10 delay to the therapy cap increase. Although some of these legislative twists and turns have caused headaches for therapists, others have been hugely positive. For instance, some form of direct access is now available in all 50 states as well as Washington, DC, and the US Virgin Islands. Read on to learn this year’s top regulatory changes. Regulatory Heavy-Hitters of …

  • Direct Access Laws by State (Alabama-Hawaii) Image

    articleDec 8, 2017 | 10 min. read

    Direct Access Laws by State (Alabama-Hawaii)

    If you’re a physical therapist—and you’re licensed in the United States—then you’re practicing in a direct access state. That’s right: In all 50 states—as well as the US Virgin Islands and DC—direct access to at least a physical therapy evaluation is the law of the land. But, before you start seeing every patient who walks through your door without a physician referral, there are a few things you ought to know. The laws around direct access can …

  • webinarAug 13, 2013

    Rehab Therapy Industry News

    In July, we hosted a webinar focused on rehab therapy industry news. This session covered an array of newsworthy and timely topics, including: Functional limitation reporting and other Medicare regulations Changes to HIPAA regulations Direct access Branding PT to general consumers ICD-10

  • What the New HCAHPS Proposal Means for the Future of Hospital-Based PT  Image

    articleAug 11, 2016 | 3 min. read

    What the New HCAHPS Proposal Means for the Future of Hospital-Based PT

    When a patient is in pain, that patient wants relief—fast. And even if the patient knows medication is only a temporary fix—and a potentially dangerous one, at that—he or she will probably still choose drugs over longer-lasting, less-instant treatment options like physical therapy. For healthcare providers beholden to payment structures that incentivize patient satisfaction, that preference presents a real pickle: give the patient what he or she wants—long-term consequences be damned—or risk lower satisfaction scores (and potentially …

  • Unwrapping MIPS and the Final Rule: How to Prepare for 2019 Image

    webinarNov 5, 2018

    Unwrapping MIPS and the Final Rule: How to Prepare for 2019

    Picture this: snowflakes drift lazily through the bitter winter air and pile softly on your windowsill. You’re snuggled up under your softest blanket, holding a steaming cup of cocoa and smiling as your family laughs and chatters happily after tearing open their holiday gifts. Then, someone hands you a box wrapped in shiny blue paper with a tag that reads, “From Medicare.” You rip into the bright wrapping paper, but as it falls to the floor, you …

  • How the Affordable Care Act Impacts Patient Payment Collection Image

    articleMay 16, 2016 | 5 min. read

    How the Affordable Care Act Impacts Patient Payment Collection

    You take the good; you take the bad. You take ’em both, and you have healthcare reform. Like most government-led initiatives, healthcare reform in general—and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in particular—has inspired a lot of passionate debate. And that’s because, while it has expanded health coverage to millions of previously uninsured people (woo-hoo!), it also has given way to some less-than-positive consequences. One such effect: the trend toward increased patient financial responsibility (whomp, whomp). Out-of-Pocket Overload …

  • This Week in PT News, June 12 Image

    articleJun 12, 2015 | 2 min. read

    This Week in PT News, June 12

    New Study Reveals Why Some Indigenous Cultures Don’t Experience Back Pain According to NPR, California acupuncturist Esther Gokhale recently conducted an investigation into the factors that might explain why some indigenous cultures don’t experience low back pain. Like 75% of Americans, Gokhale has experienced back pain, and she wasn’t convinced Western medicine could cure her ailment. So, she spent ten years visiting and studying populations that report having little to no back pain. She noticed that while …

  • Direct Access Laws by State (Idaho-Mississippi) Image

    articleDec 11, 2017 | 9 min. read

    Direct Access Laws by State (Idaho-Mississippi)

    Yesterday, I broke down the what’s what of direct access laws by state, starting in Alabama and ending in Hawaii . Today, I’m continuing our guided tour of direct access law by kicking things off in Idaho and making our way down the list to Mississippi. (Don’t worry about gas money: we’ll do it all from the comfort of our homes or offices.) Just to reiterate, I’m not a legal or compliance expert, and all of the …

  • CMS Puts FLR on the Chopping Block in 2019 Proposed Rule Image

    articleJul 13, 2018 | 5 min. read

    CMS Puts FLR on the Chopping Block in 2019 Proposed Rule

    Earlier this week, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2019 physician fee schedule proposed rule . Among other possible changes, the proposal includes a measure to end functional limitation reporting (FLR) requirements for claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2019. The proposed rule aims to reduce regulatory burden. This measure aligns with the proposed rule’s overall theme of reducing the administrative burden associated with documentation and reporting requirements …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.