Many WebPT Members and Blog readers already are familiar with the importance of providing documentation that satisfies the requirements set forth by payers and regulatory agencies. But, did you know there are additional important reasons for providing excellent documentation? That’s exactly what we’re going to talk about today.In the past few years, review processes for outpatient therapy documentation have become more detailed:

  1. Technical compliance is held to a more consistent standard. We’ve seen this with the rules governing physician signatures on plans of care as well as the 10-visit progress note timeline.
  2. The quality of the content is being examined more stringently to determine whether therapists have adequately accounted for the skills required during therapy sessions. These standards have been in place for some time, but they’ve been more clearly and specifically defined in recent years.
  3. Documentation is being reviewed to assess the quality of care provided.

With these areas of review in mind, the question becomes: what constitutes documentation negligence, based on today’s standards?What is the definition of negligence?Professional negligence is defined as a breach of the duty of care between two professionals and their clients. The duty of care is a common law arrangement in which the client expects a level of professionalism and adherence to standards commonly held by those in the profession. In his book Legal, Ethical, and Practical Aspects of Patient Care Documentation, Ronald W. Scott, PT, JD, defines healthcare negligence as “the delivery of patient care that falls below the standards expected of ordinary reasonable practitioners of the same profession acting under the same or similar circumstances.” Scott goes on to describe how the provider’s history-taking, physical examination, treatment plan, and communication with other healthcare providers all come into play for the defense team in a healthcare negligence case. Remember, most liability cases do not surface for 18-24 months.What does my documentation have to do with negligence?As explained above, the defining factors for negligence include the provider’s history-taking, physical exam, treatment plan, and communication with other healthcare providers regarding the patient’s care. So, if a provider creates substandard patient documentation—which may lead to patient harm—the provider may be held accountable for negligence based on the documentation content. For example, let’s say a patient sustains a burn from a hot pack—which was applied by a therapy aide—during his or her tenth treatment session. The patient then reports the incident to the clinic three hours post-treatment. Several acceptable standards will be considered during the documentation review process to determine whether this incident constitutes negligence. Here are some of the questions reviewers might ask:Was the therapy aide properly oriented and competent to apply the hot pack?Does the state practice act permit therapy aides to apply hot packs?

  • Was the therapy aide appropriately supervised during the time of the incident?
  • Did the therapy clinic have a clinical policy for the application of moist heat (e.g., mandatory skin checks pre- and post-treatment? Was the policy followed?)
  • Did the therapist conduct and document a thorough initial evaluation that captured sensation testing results and any potential treatment complexities (e.g., concerns related to a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM)?
  • Did the therapist note a precaution within the chart to alert other staff members of those treatment complexities and advise them to use extra toweling?
  • Did the therapist report the incident to the referring physician?
  • Was a policy in place to monitor the hydrocollator temperature and cleaning? Was the policy followed? Did the process match the manufacturer’s guidelines per the product manual?

Here are a few examples of possible negligence findings from our theoretical scenario:

  • According to the initial evaluation, there was a past medical history (PMHx) of DM, but no testing to assess sensation in the areas where moist heat would be applied. Furthermore:
    1. The therapist negligently contributed to the burn by not testing sensation, as such testing is standard protocol for DM.
    2. The facility did not meet acceptable standards for having a clinical policy in place for moist heat application and hydrocollator cleaning.
    3. The facility—and more specifically, the therapist—never notified the referring physician of the incident.
    4. The initial evaluation lacked full documentation of the complexities of the patient. These complexities—some of which would impact sensation and thus, the patient’s treatment—also included several operative procedures, hypertension (HTN), osteoarthritis (OA), and reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS). Documenting these types of complexities is consistent with acceptable standards.
    5. An incidental finding—which also would be mentioned in the expert’s report—was that the documents did not meet the minimum acceptable standards for reporting claims to Medicare

So, what do I need to do?The key to avoiding negligence issues is to provide and document—to acceptable standards—skilled, reasonable, and necessary care. Legal cases typically involve careful review of many different federal and state regulations to determine:

  1. whether the minimum acceptable standard of content documentation was breached, and
  2. whether unacceptable documentation may have contributed to an adverse patient event.

Acceptable standards are governed by:

  • Federal policies such as the Medicare Policy Manual
  • State practice guidelines
  • APTA, AOTA, and ASHA scope-of-practice guidelines
  • Commercial insurance carrier guidelines
  • Similar providers in your community

To enhance compliance with billing and documentation regulations and guidelines, many therapy providers have started documenting electronically using electronic medical record (EMR) systems. However, it’s important to remember that EMRs are not a substitute for a therapist’s clinical reasoning and judgment. Here are some basic documentation best practices to follow—whether or not you use an EMR:

  • Document a complete history of the patient’s care following his or her injury, including (but not limited to):
    • new medications
    • potential impact of those medications on therapy service progression
    • care provided by other professionals
    • PMHx
  • Document baseline and monitor vital signs where appropriate, based on the patient’s presentation.
  • Document all precautions and communicate them to support staff. Remember, therapists are responsible for—and must oversee—all care delivered by support staff.
  • Document the patient’s complexities, as they may impact the patient’s prognosis and rehab potential. For example, if you are evaluating a new total knee replacement patient who also has a diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia and is now on anti-coagulation medications due to a DVT, you absolutely should document these details.  These issues add a level of sophistication to the treatment and the skills required for that treatment, as they alter how aggressively the therapist can deliver PROM. That in turn impacts patient safety and quality of care. 
  • Here are a few examples of items you could document to indicate the skill involved in care:Verbal or tactile cueing requirements,
    1. Patient follow-through and safety in performing activities or HEP,
    2. Vital sign responses and recovery for certain activities, and
    3. Therapist hand placement for PROM (to protect a recent surgical procedure).

What are the key takeaways?Most of the compliance-related information therapy providers consume on a daily basis pertains to CMS documentation guidelines. Yes, CMS may have the most technical rules, but regardless of how stringent—or lax—the regulations are, don’t lose sight of the overall purpose of clinical documentation. Healthcare providers—including therapists—document care delivery to support billing as well as to educate other providers involved in a patient’s care.At this point, you may be saying (or have already said), “Man, I hate documentation! I just want to treat patients. If I go the cash-based route, can I avoid all this?” The answer: Nope! Even if you never bill another insurance company, the professional standard of care still applies to you—and your documentation must support that standard of care. I wanted to bring clarity to that very important point, because I’ve talked with therapists who really thought all their documentation woes would go away the minute they switched to a cash-based business model.Thankfully, an electronic documentation system like WebPT can assist you in meeting technical documentation requirements and thus, avoiding the issues discussed above. But, it’s important to remember that systems like WebPT can only cue you; they cannot document for you. Therefore, you still need to understand the requirements that apply to you—and implement the processes and policies necessary to ensure you and your staff comply with those requirements. On that note, a compliance plan can help you develop processes, establish policies, and maintain accountability. Interested in building a compliance plan for your clinic? Click here to get started.

WebPT + Billing Software - Regular BannerWebPT + Billing Software - Small Banner
  • 10 Defensible Documentation Tips for PTs Image

    downloadDec 22, 2016

    10 Defensible Documentation Tips for PTs

    Therapists often view documentation as onerous. But, as you well know, that certainly doesn’t mean the practice is invaluable or meaningless. In fact, documentation tells your patients’ stories and serves as a verifiable record of patient care, thereby giving key decision-makers (i.e., payers) the right information to determine your value. More importantly, defensible documentation helps you, the rehab therapist, prove your ability to achieve patient outcomes—and get paid. Still need some tips to tell your patients’ stories …

  • Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum Image

    articleAug 18, 2018 | 34 min. read

    Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum

    Last week, WebPT’s trio of billing experts—Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, WebPT President and Co-founder; John Wallace, PT, MS, WebPT Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management; and Dianne Jewell, PT, DPT, PhD, WebPT Director of Clinical Practice, Outcomes, and Education—hosted a live open forum on physical therapy billing . Before the webinar, we challenged registrants to serve up their trickiest PT billing head-scratchers—and boy, did they deliver! We received literally hundreds of questions on …

  • Final Thoughts from CSM: Outcomes, Payment Reform, and—Purple Cows? Image

    articleFeb 9, 2015 | 19 min. read

    Final Thoughts from CSM: Outcomes, Payment Reform, and—Purple Cows?

    By Saturday morning, attendees of the APTA’s Combined Sections Meeting (CSM) were moving with a little less pep in their step—and a couple extra shots of espresso in their morning coffee. Still, the educational sessions on the final day of CSM were chock full of eager learners looking to eat up a few more morsels of wisdom before catching their planes home from Indy. Here are some highlights from day three’s informational smorgasbord (check out recaps from …

  • What is Defensible Documentation, and Why Does it Matter? Image

    articleNov 23, 2015 | 4 min. read

    What is Defensible Documentation, and Why Does it Matter?

    I think Julie Andrews was spot-on when she sang the following verse about physical therapists: “When the dog bites, when the bee stings, when you’re feeling sad, you simply remember your defensible documentation , and then you don’t feel so bad.” That is how it goes, right? No? Whoops. Looks like I mixed up some of the lyrics. But, even if defensible documentation isn’t one of your favorite things, that doesn’t make it trivial. In fact, it’s …

  • So Long to Silos: Why Health Systems Must Embrace Interoperability Now Image

    articleSep 9, 2016 | 5 min. read

    So Long to Silos: Why Health Systems Must Embrace Interoperability Now

    Rome wasn’t built in a day—and interoperability across all health data systems won’t be achieved overnight. In fact, we’ve been paving the road to complete connectivity for several years now , and there’s still no definitive end in sight. But now, more than ever, the companies providing those systems have some serious incentive to hasten the pace of their construction efforts: I’m talking about the nationwide push toward value-based, patient-centered care delivery . After all, to succeed …

  • PT Primer for Coding Pain and Injuries in ICD-10 Image

    articleApr 9, 2014 | 6 min. read

    PT Primer for Coding Pain and Injuries in ICD-10

    One of the most talked about—and most feared—characteristics of ICD-10 is the massive size of the new code set. Whereas ICD-9 contains approximately 13,000 diagnosis codes, ICD-10 has around 68,000—an increase of more than fivefold. With so many codes to choose from, how can you be sure you’re selecting the right one—or even looking in the right place? Well, two of the main reasons patients seek physical therapy are injury and/or pain. So, let’s start there. Here …

  • Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World Image

    articleOct 28, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World

    Some of you might remember all of the hype around Y2K. Rumors and speculation were abuzz, and there were people who thought all hell was going to break loose when the clock struck midnight on January 1, 2000. And then—dun, dun, dun—nothing happened. The Hyperbolic Hype The lead-up to October 1 was similar in many respects, albeit on a much smaller scale. People all over the healthcare community were freaking out about the unknown; some large practices …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux Image

    articleSep 24, 2015 | 16 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux

    Just when we thought we’d gotten every ICD-10 question under the sun, we got, well, more questions. Like, a lot more. But, we take that as a good sign, because like a scrappy reporter trying to get to the bottom of a big story, our audience of blog readers and webinar attendees aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions—which means they’re serious about preparing themselves for the changes ahead. And we’re equally serious about providing them with …

  • articleMay 2, 2011 | 4 min. read

    Getting Back to PT Practice Documentation Basics

    There is no question that maintaining a high level of quality in the documentation of treatment for patients at a physical therapy clinic is a top priority. It is easy to develop a love/hate relationship with the documentation that is both prudent and a requirement to be in compliance legally and to expect reimbursement from Medicare or a patient’s insurance company. As is true in any discipline, it is a smart idea to go back to the …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.