You’ve probably heard the saying, “A picture is worth a thousand words.” The same logic applies to ICD-10 coding—albeit in a less extreme manner. While you probably won’t need a thousand ICD-10 codes to paint a complete picture of a patient’s diagnosis, there’s a good chance you’ll need more than one—and for many rehab therapists, that represents a huge departure from the coding status quo. With that in mind, here are a few tips for using a multi-code approach to selecting ICD-10 codes:

Medicare Open Forum - Regular BannerMedicare Open Forum - Small Banner

1. Question the referring physician.

I’m guessing that a hefty portion of your referral scripts contain only a single diagnosis code from the referring physician. And while a plug-and-go protocol—that is, mindlessly transferring the referring physician’s code to your documentation without a second thought—might fly with ICD-9, it won’t work so well with ICD-10. That’s because the new code set places a huge emphasis on clinical judgment (which, incidentally, is why those oh-so-coveted “cheat sheets” could land you in hot water). Why? Well, look at it this way: one of the driving forces behind the transition to ICD-10 is that it allows providers to represent patient diagnoses in a much more detailed, specific way. And who better to identify—and code for—that specificity than an actual specialist?

Remember, your physicians aren’t the musculoskeletal experts; you are. That’s why it’s so important that you take a second look at each referral diagnosis to ensure the physician’s code selection truly represents the patient’s situation in the most accurate, specific, complete way possible. In many cases, you may find it necessary to swap in a more specific primary diagnosis code and/or add secondary codes to express the full breadth of the patient’s reasons for seeking your services. Otherwise, your payers might be left questioning the medical necessity of those services—which could lead to denied payment. And at that point, “But my referring physician said…” will not serve as a valid excuse; you—not your referring doc—will be the one who suffers the financial consequences of poor coding practice.  

2. Account for all affected body parts and lateralities.

If you’ve already started perusing the ICD-10 code set—and at this point in the game, I really hope you have—you may have noticed that many of the “bilateral” codes you’ve come to know and love didn’t make the ICD-10 cut. Instead, in most cases, you’ll see separate code options for both left and right. So, if a patient is experiencing a particular condition on both sides of his or her body, it would make sense to submit both of those codes—and that is exactly what you are supposed to do. But this tweak to your coding code of conduct (say that five times fast!) isn’t the product of some evil ploy to make you submit more codes; rather, it’s a mechanism for collecting more detailed data (i.e., tracking the total number of instances of a particular diagnosis on the left as well as the total number of instances on the right).

That said, ICD-10 often does provide “multiple sites” codes for single conditions involving multiple sites (e.g., osteoarthritis). When no such code is available, though, you’ll need to submit separate codes for each affected body part.

3. Use external cause codes when appropriate.

As Courtney Lefferts explains in this blog post, the group of diagnosis codes you submit for any one patient should answer the following questions as completely and accurately as possible:

  • Who?
  • What?
  • Where?
  • When?
  • Why?

To answer some of those questions, you’ll need to submit external cause codes. Found in Chapter 20 of the ICD-10 code set, external cause codes provide additional context around certain diagnoses. It’s important to note, however, that you can’t submit external cause codes for all principal diagnosis codes; external causes only apply to certain categories of codes, as noted within the coding guidelines that accompany each chapter of the code set. Most of the external cause code-eligible diagnoses that are relevant to rehab therapists appear in Chapter 19, also known as the injury chapter. Each external cause code answers one of four questions:

  • How did the injury or condition happen?
  • Where did it happen?
  • What was the patient doing when it happened?
  • Was it intentional or unintentional?

Even though there is no national requirement to use external cause codes, if you have the clinical information necessary to select one or more of these supplementary codes—and the patient’s primary diagnosis code allows for the submission of those codes—then you absolutely should do so. For a more in-depth look at the ins and outs of external cause codes, check out this blog post and this video.

4. Order codes according to significance.

When it comes to submitting multiple diagnosis codes on a single claim, order matters. That’s because, while the HCFA 1500 forms were updated in 2013 to accommodate ICD-10, they only allow for four diagnosis code pointers per line item. Thus, it’s important that you’ve arranged the ICD-10 codes in order of importance, with the primary code appearing at the top, followed by the codes that most strongly support the medical necessity of your services. That way, you’ll be able to point those diagnoses to the CPT codes appearing on the claim.

5. Don’t submit more codes for the sake of submitting more codes.

Sure, ICD-10 likely will increase the average number of codes you’re submitting for each patient. But, that doesn’t mean you should approach coding with the goal of selecting as many codes as possible—relevance be damned! Instead, submit as many codes as necessary to describe the patient’s condition as best you can—whether that’s one code or 21. However, keep in mind that, as noted above, each claim form can only accommodate up to 12 codes.

While a picture might be worth a thousand words, a good coder will express those words in the most efficient way possible. In many cases though, a single ICD-10 code won’t suffice. So, to avoid creating half-developed snapshots of your patients, focus on using multiple codes to capture their diagnoses clearly and completely.

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. (And be sure to check out this separate PT billing FAQ we recently put together.) Questions …

  • Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum Image

    articleAug 18, 2018 | 34 min. read

    Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum

    Last week, WebPT’s trio of billing experts—Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, WebPT President and Co-founder; John Wallace, PT, MS, WebPT Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management; and Dianne Jewell, PT, DPT, PhD, WebPT Director of Clinical Practice, Outcomes, and Education—hosted a live open forum on physical therapy billing . Before the webinar, we challenged registrants to serve up their trickiest PT billing head-scratchers—and boy, did they deliver! We received literally hundreds of questions on …

  • FAQ: Physical Therapy Billing Live Q&A Image

    articleAug 30, 2019 | 51 min. read

    FAQ: Physical Therapy Billing Live Q&A

    Earlier this week, Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC—WebPT’s Co-Founder and Chief Clinical Officer—and John Wallace, WebPT’s Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management, paired up to answer rehab therapists’ most burning billing questions during a live Q&A-style webinar . And, boy, did we get a lot of great ones. So many, in fact, that we couldn’t possibly get to them all live, so we created this massive post-webinar post (our biggest yet) with the most commonly …

  • A Farewell Ode to ICD-9 Image

    articleSep 30, 2015 | 2 min. read

    A Farewell Ode to ICD-9

    As the hours count down It’s hard to believe That we’ve finally made it To ICD-10 Eve Our journey to get here Hasn’t been without strife As the US has clung To ICD-9 for dear life Letting go can be hard And change can be tough But in the modern medical world ICD-9 just isn’t enough Unlike a fine wine That gets better with time ICD-9 has aged poorly— It’s way past its prime Sure, we’ll always …

  • One ICD-10 FAQ to Rule Them All Image

    downloadNov 25, 2015

    One ICD-10 FAQ to Rule Them All

    The transition to ICD-10 was an unexpected journey for many healthcare providers—and making the switch was no easy quest. That’s why we traveled far over the Misty Mountains cold—and to dungeons deep and caverns old—to gather the answers to your most frequently asked ICD-10 questions.   Now, it’s time to head to the Shire, eat second breakfast, and make your coding concerns disappear. To go there (and back again), download the One ICD-10 FAQ to Rule Them …

  • The Final 48: Your Guide to ICD-10 Transition Day Image

    articleAug 31, 2015 | 5 min. read

    The Final 48: Your Guide to ICD-10 Transition Day

    For law enforcement officials, the 48 hours immediately following a crime are the most crucial. Why? Because if they haven’t found any leads, identified any suspects, or made any arrests by the time the two-day clock expires, their chances of cracking the case—and, in some cases, saving lives—dwindle significantly. And while ICD-10 isn’t exactly a life-or-death situation, those HIPAA-covered providers making the switch will be up against a similar make-it-or-break-it timeframe. The only difference—besides the whole crime …

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part 4 Image

    articleNov 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part 4

    Like the many Land Before Time sequels, the versions of our ICD-10 FAQ keep on-a-comin’. But—unlike those beloved dinosaur tales—I don’t anticipate 12 more versions (plus a TV series) will be necessary to cover what’s to come with ICD-10. Still, the questions continue to roll in—albeit a bit slower than they did a couple of months ago. However, most of the inquiries we’ve received in recent weeks have been super specific. That’s why, our most recent webinar—the …

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part Three Image

    articleOct 20, 2015 | 16 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part Three

    In the movie world, threequels have a reputation for failing to match the glory of their predecessors (The Hangover Part III, anyone?). It’s almost like the writers know they’re out of material, but instead of knowing when to fold ’em, they continue to hold ’em—right up until the inevitable flop. But with ICD-10, the questions just keep getting better—which means the third and latest installment of our ICD-10 FAQ is even juicier than the last. So, grab …

  • ICD-10 and Your Claims: 7 Essential Must-Knows Image

    articleSep 14, 2015 | 7 min. read

    ICD-10 and Your Claims: 7 Essential Must-Knows

    As we’ve suggested in previous posts , one of the best ways to ensure your practice covers all of its ICD-10 prep work bases is to audit your processes and workflows. By doing so, you’ll identify all the ways you and your staff currently use and interact with ICD-9 codes. If you’ve done that, you’ve no doubt pinpointed one of the largest—and most obvious—ICD-9 touchpoints: your claims. Then, you probably asked yourself (or the almighty Google), “How …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.