Transitions aren’t always easy. And as the mother of a young daughter, I’m more than familiar with the frustration and tantrums that can come as a result of change. But as professionals in the healthcare industry, we don’t have time for tears or frowny faces—especially when it comes to ICD-10. With under two months to go before the big transition, there’s no room for meltdowns; we need to put our heads down and take on the change swiftly and confidently. That’s because there’s truly something to be said about “ripping off the Band-Aid”; it’s simply less painful that way. But CMS and the AMA think differently: they’ve adopted a slower and more painful approach to tackling the transition. According to their recent announcement, during the 12 months immediately following the October 1, 2015, date, “Medicare review contractors will not deny physician or other practitioner claims billed under the Part B physician fee schedule through either automated medical review or complex medical record review based solely on the specificity of the ICD-10 diagnosis code as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family.”

Cashing In on Private Pay: The PT's Guide to Going Out-of-Network - Regular BannerCashing In on Private Pay: The PT's Guide to Going Out-of-Network - Small Banner

What Does that Really Mean?

If you think this announcement means that Medicare will forgive all your ICD-10 coding sins, you could be in for a rude awakening. After all, while the 12 months of claim-denial flexibility might seem like a saving grace on the surface, you have to ask yourself: what is it really saving us from? Not a thing. Whether you learn how to code properly now—or 12 months from October 1—the results are the same: if you can’t successfully make the transition, payers will deny your claims. And this “grace period” is not your free pass to kick the ICD-10 can down the road. You still must transition to ICD-10, and—more importantly—you still must make an effort to code to the highest level of specificity. Furthermore, this "grace period" is for Medicare claims only. Third-party payers have yet to implement any type of one-year transition period.

Is Your Practice Safe?

Speaking of coding to the highest level of specificity, you’ve got to consider what errors this grace period actually permits. Here’s what you need to know:

Date of Service

For all HIPAA-covered entities, you must submit ICD-10 codes for all dates of service on or after October 1, 2015. This date is non-negotiable, and all payers will deny your claims if you use ICD-9 codes for dates of service on or after October 1. As for non-HIPAA-covered payers, you’ll need to contact each one directly to determine whether it plans to adopt ICD-10.

Family Grace

Even with Medicare's grace period ruling, you still must use a valid code within the correct family of codes. So, if your coding selection majorly misses the mark, you’ll receive a denial. But if you make a mistake and still land within the correct family of codes, there’s a good chance Medicare will reimburse the claim.

Dual Coding

This shouldn’t come as a surprise, but if your claims contain both ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for any dates of service on or after October 1, you will not receive payment. That said, you’ll have to pay extra close attention to any claims that span the transition date. In those cases, split your claims—and be sure to check with your payers to find out how they prefer you to handle split claims.

What Should You Do to Prepare?

First, I suggest moving forward as if the grace period weren’t happening. If you absolutely need it, it’s there for you. But the sooner you’re totally ICD-10-ready, the sooner the stress of the transition will be behind you. Why not put in the extra work now and make sure you’re able to find the right code every single time—starting with your first claim submission? To make the preparation process easier for you, this month we’re covering everything you need to know about ICD-10 right here on the WebPT Blog. We’ve also created the Physical Therapist’s Crunch-Time Guide to ICD-10 for you to download and use completely free of charge. And if you’re looking for even more awesome (and awesomely free) information, be sure to check out ICD10forPT.com and this month's webinar, co-starring ICD-10 expert Rick Gawenda.


Whether your prefer Band-Aids with Hello Kitty designs or water-blocking plus technology, slowly pulling them off isn’t going to ease the pain of transitioning to ICD-10—and neither will the grace period. With that in mind, I urge you to keep your chin up and move forward to take on all the changes that lie ahead with a no-fear, can-do attitude.

  • Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World Image

    articleOct 28, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World

    Some of you might remember all of the hype around Y2K. Rumors and speculation were abuzz, and there were people who thought all hell was going to break loose when the clock struck midnight on January 1, 2000. And then—dun, dun, dun—nothing happened. The Hyperbolic Hype The lead-up to October 1 was similar in many respects, albeit on a much smaller scale. People all over the healthcare community were freaking out about the unknown; some large practices …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux Image

    articleSep 24, 2015 | 16 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux

    Just when we thought we’d gotten every ICD-10 question under the sun, we got, well, more questions. Like, a lot more. But, we take that as a good sign, because like a scrappy reporter trying to get to the bottom of a big story, our audience of blog readers and webinar attendees aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions—which means they’re serious about preparing themselves for the changes ahead. And we’re equally serious about providing them with …

  • Founder Letter: ICD-What? Image

    articleSep 3, 2015 | 7 min. read

    Founder Letter: ICD-What?

    By now, it’s obvious that the entire US healthcare system is going to face a huge change come October 1: the transition to ICD-10 . This new—well, new to us—way of coding has been on the discussion table for decades , and for the last several years, its implementation has been the topic of much anticipation as well as a fair amount of resistance. So, if you find yourself in the dark—completely unaware that ICD-10 is happening—then …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ Image

    articleSep 1, 2015 | 21 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ

    Yesterday, we hosted the largest webinar in WebPT history . Thousands of rehab therapy professionals attended the live session, which focused on ICD-10 coding examples . As expected, we received a lot of questions. Below is a collection of the webinar’s most frequently asked questions. The Seventh Character Craze What is the seventh character? The seventh character didn’t exist in ICD-9 , so it’s caused a great deal of confusion. Essentially, it’s a mechanism for applying greater …

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. Questions related to: • WebPT • Modifier 59 • Other Modifiers • Coding • ICD-10 • …

  • ICD-10 Open Forum Image

    webinarOct 5, 2015

    ICD-10 Open Forum

    On October 1, the US officially said RIP to ICD-9 and brought ICD-10 to life. For some of you, the transition might’ve been all sugar and spice—a real treat. But for many others, the switch to the new code set might’ve left you feeling overwhelmed, tricked, or even a bit scared. At the very least, you might be haunted by some lingering questions. That’s where we can help. We’ve brewed a cauldron filled to the brim with …

  • The History of ICD-10 Image

    articleOct 9, 2013 | 3 min. read

    The History of ICD-10

    As we’ve stated in previous blog posts, the US will transition to ICD-10 codes on October 1, 2015—to some of you, that might seem like a quickly approaching date. Others might be wondering, “What’s the rush?” Know that it only seems hurried now because of pesky procrastination. To truly understand this, we must delve into the history of ICD-10. In the beginning... The World Health Organization (WHO), the public health sector of the United Nations, which focuses …

  • Dual-Coding Wonder Twin Powers: Activate? Image

    articleSep 2, 2015 | 3 min. read

    Dual-Coding Wonder Twin Powers: Activate?

    Thirty days has September—and so has your clinic to prepare for ICD-10. Just one month from now, you’ll have to start using ICD-10 codes on most claims with dates of service on or after October 1, 2015. Did you see I wrote, “most”? That’s not a typo. The reason I can’t say “all” is because not all payers are switching to ICD-10. That means you’ll have to be bi-code-lingual (so don’t purge your brain of all ICD-9 …

  • Founder Letter: It’s a Brave New ICD-10 World Image

    articleOct 7, 2015 | 4 min. read

    Founder Letter: It’s a Brave New ICD-10 World

    October 1—the day that marked the transition to ICD-10—is behind us; we made it. And so far, so good. According to this Modern Healthcare article : “One of the most maligned and feared events in healthcare history began with a whimper.” Although ICD-Day has come and gone, it’s prudent to remember that a “whimper” of an introduction doesn’t necessarily indicate what’s to come. That’s because many of ICD-10’s repercussions have yet to reveal themselves—especially when it comes …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.