Face screaming in fear emoji Patients freaking out over high copays and deductibles? Learn how to handle 'em in our March webinar. Register now.


In addition to unleashing all the 2015 PQRS changes, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) decided to throw us another curveball by introducing the following four HCPCS modifiers—called the X{EPSU} modifiers—to “define specific subsets” of the 59 modifier.

  1. XE Separate Encounter, A Service That Is Distinct Because It Occurred During A Separate Encounter
  2. XS Separate Structure, A Service That Is Distinct Because It Was Performed On A Separate Organ/Structure
  3. XP Separate Practitioner, A Service That Is Distinct Because It Was Performed By A Different Practitioner
  4. XU Unusual Non-Overlapping Service, The Use Of A Service That Is Distinct Because It Does Not Overlap Usual Components Of The Main Service

Download your modifier 59 decision chart.

Enter your email address below, and we’ll send you a super-simple flow chart to help you decide whether it’s appropriate to use modifier 59 in any given billing situation.

Please enable JavaScript to submit form.

How I Met Your 59 Modifier

So, why did CMS decide to create the new subsets? (Don’t worry; it won’t take nine years for this explanation). Simply put: the 59 modifier causes more confusion and anxiety than waking up next to a pineapple. It’s meant to describe a distinct procedural service, but because the 59 modifier is so widely used and so broadly defined, providers wind up using it to:

  • Infrequently (and most of the time, correctly), identify a separate encounter.
  • Less commonly (and less correctly), define a separate anatomic site.
  • More commonly (and often incorrectly), define a distinct service.

In fact, current 59 modifier use is so wonky that it’s often “associated with considerable abuse and high levels of manual audit activity,” reported CMS in an MLN Matters release, which has landed some providers in hot water via “reviews, appeals, and even civil fraud and abuse cases.” Plus, the 59 modifier “often overrides the edit in the exact circumstance for which CMS created it in the first place.” The new subsets, however, allow for greater specificity, which CMS believes will reduce errors and misuse.

But that’s not the end of the story.

The Plot Twist

In a recent statement, CMS announced that it would allow “the continued use of modifier 59 after January 1, 2015 [...] in any instance in which it was correctly used prior to January 1, 2015.” So, while CMS will continue “to introduce the modifiers in a gradual and controlled fashion,” for the moment, you can keep using modifier 59 the same way you’ve been using it (provided you’ve been using it correctly) until CMS provides further guidance. Montero Therapy Services offers further clarification in this blog post, stating that the “APTA reported that per CMS, therapists could ‘keep on using Modifier 59 in reimbursement claims to indicate that a HCPCS represents a service that is separate and distinct from another service to which it is paired under the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) program.’”

What Happens Next?

Though the new subsets aren’t likely to inspire a cult following, you’ll want to pay close attention as updates come down the CMS pike, because sooner or later, CMS says it “will identify situations in which a specific modifier will be required and will publish specific guidance before implementing edits or audits.” Until then, keep on keepin’ on—but make sure you and your billing staff are aware of the changes as they come.

Unsure if you’re using the 59 modifier correctly? Check out our blog post or our open-forum modifier webinar for more information.

New Year, New Codes: How to Bill for PT and OT Evaluations in 2017 - Regular BannerNew Year, New Codes: How to Bill for PT and OT Evaluations in 2017 - Small Banner
  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. Questions related to: • WebPT • Modifier 59 • Other Modifiers • Coding • ICD-10 • …

  • 9 Most Common Medicare Misconceptions for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    webinarSep 8, 2016

    9 Most Common Medicare Misconceptions for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    To say that Medicare regulations are confusing is an understatement. But, it’s not just the barely-readable government gobbledygook that throws providers for a loop; it’s also the fact that the rules are always changing. If you treat Medicare patients, we’re willing to bet you’ve been tripped up by at least one of these common misconceptions—maybe without even knowing it. And that could leave a nasty bruise on your practice’s bottom line—especially if you ever find yourself at …

  • Trick or Treat: A Creepy-Crawly Compliance Quiz Image

    articleOct 31, 2016 | 1 min. read

    Trick or Treat: A Creepy-Crawly Compliance Quiz

    Medicare compliance can be tricky—if not downright terrifying (sounds an awful lot like our favorite creepy-crawly holiday, Halloween). So when it comes to compliance, do you scare easily? Or, do you know the mean Medicare streets like the back of your hand? Take this frightening Medicare compliance quiz to find out whether your compliance basket is fraught with compliance tricks or filled to the brim with satisfying treats. Oh! And one last thing: while the scenarios and …

  • PT and OT Evaluation Codes Cheat Sheet Image

    downloadDec 21, 2016

    PT and OT Evaluation Codes Cheat Sheet

    As of January 1, 2017, PTs and OTs must use a new set of CPT codes to bill for patient evaluations and re-evaluations. But, it's not a simple swap-out across the board; instead, when coding for initial evaluations, therapists must now select one of three codes, which are tiered according to the complexity of the evaluation. But, what separates a low-complexity evaluation from a moderate- or high-complexity one? And how should therapists go about making their coding …

  • Collaboration Compliance: The Ins and Outs of Team Therapy and Group Therapy Image

    articleOct 21, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Collaboration Compliance: The Ins and Outs of Team Therapy and Group Therapy

    Understanding the nuances of team therapy and group therapy —and how to bill for each—presents some challenges; based on the ol’ English language, you’d think these analogous terms are virtually the same. But, when it comes to rehab therapy billing, these two phrases are non-interchangeable—and treating them the same could put your practice at risk of claim denials or audits. So, how do know if you’re billing the right codes for treatment scenarios involving multiple patients—or multiple …

  • The Rehab Therapist’s Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule Image

    articleNov 4, 2015 | 6 min. read

    The Rehab Therapist’s Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule

    November is finally here, which means we here at WebPT can’t stop thinking about a juicy, flavorful, hot-out-of-the oven—Medicare Final Rule. While your tastebuds probably aren’t jumping with joy over the thought of chewing over a bunch of regulatory gobbledygook, the good news is that this year’s final rule shouldn’t be too tough to swallow (and if it is, you can always add more gravy). We’ve already picked out the most important pieces and served ’em up …

  • articleDec 9, 2010 | 2 min. read

    The Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010

    This legislation would prevent the scheduled 25.5% Medicare payment cut to physical therapists and other health care providers paid under the physician fee schedule. Today, the US House of Representatives passed Senate Amendment to H.R. 4994 , the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010 (by a vote of 409-2). This legislation would prevent the scheduled 25.5% Medicare payment cut to physical therapists and other health care providers paid under the physician fee schedule. The provision in …

  • articleNov 29, 2011 | 3 min. read

    PQRS: The Case for Registry over Claims Based Reporting

    Here at WebPT HQ, we are gearing up for PQRS 2012. One of the pieces of PQRS that is most commonly misunderstood is the difference between claims and registry based services. Let's take a minute and clear this up. Claims and registry-based reporting both result in the same outcome for your clinic-- successful participation in PQRS. WebPT offers both options with claims-based being priced $99 per calendar year and registry-based at $299 for the calendar year. Many …

  • Closing the Loop: Why PTs are Critical to ACO Success Image

    articleJul 21, 2016 | 7 min. read

    Closing the Loop: Why PTs are Critical to ACO Success

    Last year, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced its plan to link half of all Medicare fee-for-service payments to alternative payment models by 2018. That’s only a year and a half away, which means the clock is ticking—and the demand for alternative model adoption is increasing. If you work in a large healthcare organization—especially a hospital—you undoubtedly already know about one such model that’s been garnering quite a lot of attention across the …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.