Documentation sucks. We get it. We know it ain’t warm and fuzzy with rainbows and sunshine. It’s cumbersome and bang-your-head-against-a-wall frustrating. But as a physical therapist, it’s the name of the game.

According to the APTA, documentation is crucial because it:

  1. Serves as a record of patient care, including a report of the patient’s status, physical therapy management, and outcome of physical therapy intervention. It’s also a tool for the planning and provision of services and is a communication vehicle among providers.
  2. Tells others about our abilities, our unique body of knowledge, and the services we provide as PTs and PTAs.
  3. Demonstrates compliance with federal, state, payer, and local regulations.
  4. Provides a historical account of patient encounters clinics can use as evidence in potential legal situations.
  5. Demonstrates appropriate service use and reimbursement for many third-party payers.
  6. Is useful for policy or research purposes including outcomes analysis.

Documenting every treatment episode is not only a professional responsibility, but a legal requirement. Plus, it’s how you get paid when working with insurance providers and Medicare. Thus, you have to document correctly and in a manner that ensures your documentation truly justifies your services. Succinctly put: Make your documentation defensible. But what is “defensible”? As Bob Thomas, PT, states in an article on AdvanceWeb.com:

“Sometimes, we make documentation too complicated. My opinion is that [defensible documentation] is our responsibility and obligation to tell the patient's assessment and treatment story. Review and audit of documentation consistently attempts to answer the questions: 1) Is this service medically necessary? and 2) Did it require skilled intervention? 

But what does medically necessary and skilled intervention actually mean? Medical necessity narratives must describe diagnoses and deficits, while skilled intervention narratives must demonstrate worth as a clinician. (To learn more about medically necessity and skilled intervention and see examples of them in documentation action, check out Bob Thomas’s full article on AdvanceWeb.com. Definitely a solid read.)

Now that you understand the basic terminology, let’s talk about how to implement. According to an article entitled “The Well-Written Record” in Rehab Management, there are nine basic tenets your documentation should follow:

  1. All entries are legible.
  2. The diagnosis clearly supports justification for rehabilitative services, or the evaluation indicates specific limitations and/or functional deficits.
  3. The documented findings support the estimated frequency and duration of care.
  4. The documentation specifies plan of care and measurable goals.
  5. The documentation clearly states the treatment provided, including the amount of time spent administering specific procedures or modalities. Each treatment note substantiates the number of billed units.
  6. A record of the patient's progress, or lack thereof, documented on a regular basis justifies the need for continued skilled therapy. Additionally, the documenter records changes to the treatment plan.
  7. The name and professional designation of the person providing the service appear at the end of each entry.
  8. The documenter records patients’ or caregivers’ subjective comments throughout the course of treatment, indicating the patient's progress, unusual occurrences, new physician orders, or complaints.
  9. At discharge, the documenter includes an objective summary providing a comparison of the patient's status from the initial visit to the time of the last encounter.

The article also stresses the importance of examining your documentation to ensure it can stand up to scrutiny. Here are a handful of questions to ask:

  • "Would your documentation stand up to a patient’s claim of injury during a visit?
  • "Would your documentation provide enough information to recall events of a particular encounter 2 to 3 years after the fact, and protect you against questions and/or possible legal proceedings?
  • "Does your documentation support the patient’s need for skilled physical therapy services on a continual basis, and provide adequate justification for the number of visits, treatments rendered, and charges submitted for reimbursement?
  • "Are the terminology and abbreviations utilized in your documentation intelligible to a non-clinician rendering payment, treatment, and authorization decisions?
  • "When a third party requests a medical record, does the chart paint an accurate picture of the course of care?
  • "Do you frequently end up writing letters of appeal or spend an undue amount of time on the telephone interpreting documentation to a reviewer?"

Beyond basic principles and self-scrutiny, the APTA also has some general documentation guidelines. Here are some key ones:

  • Document every visit/encounter.
  • Documentation should include indication of a patient’s cancellations of appointments and/or refusal of treatment.
  • Make all handwritten entries in ink. Legibility is critical in clinical documentation. If people cannot read entry, they cannot understand it.
  • Enter electronic entries with appropriate security and confidentiality provisions.
  • Include adequate identification of the patient/client, the physical therapist, and/or physical therapist assistant on all documentation.
  • Include the patient's full name and identification number, if applicable
  • Date and authenticate all entries with the provider's full name and appropriate designation (license number and printed name if state law requires it).

Lots of lists, yes, but each one is jammed with so much oh-so-valuable information. As you absorb it all, let’s summarize:

Defensible documentation has and always will be important. But with the evolution of Medicare and the increasing focus on audits, it is imperative that our documentation be detailed, clear, and correct—both for ourselves as professionals and for our patients. Exemplary documentation provides a foundation for fewer treatment errors, while reducing the number of inquiries about the treatment provided. Through defensible documentation, you can minimize payment denials as well as the likelihood of any adverse legal action


As a physical therapist, you’re there for your patients, providing exceptional care. Now it’s time to tell that story. How do you tell your story through defensible documentation? What tips do you have for other therapists?

New Year, New Codes: How to Bill for PT and OT Evaluations in 2017 - Regular BannerNew Year, New Codes: How to Bill for PT and OT Evaluations in 2017 - Small Banner
  • The Devil is in the Details: How to Document Defensibly Image

    articleNov 18, 2016 | 8 min. read

    The Devil is in the Details: How to Document Defensibly

    If we polled our readers—rehab professionals like you, that is—and asked them what they love most about their jobs, we could safely bet our bank accounts that not one of our lovely PTs, OTs, or SLPs would say, “documenting defensibly.” We know; documentation is no one’s favorite. Just ask WebPTers Brian Kunich, PT, OCS, COMT, and Bradley LaFave, who surveyed their audience with that very same question during a presentation they gave at Ascend 2016 . Some …

  • Top 3 Takeaways from CSM 2016 Image

    articleFeb 24, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Top 3 Takeaways from CSM 2016

    With record attendance—more than 11,000 rehab therapy professionals from all over the US—CSM 2016 in Anaheim, California, was abuzz with energy and enthusiasm. When I wasn’t running around in search of folks wearing “I heart PT” buttons so I could give them prizes (did you catch us on Gene Shirokobrod’s Periscope?), I was busy attending sessions in the Private Practice track. I made it to eight fantastic presentations—and wished I could have seen more. If you were …

  • Why PTs Can’t Bill for Progress Notes Image

    articleDec 1, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Why PTs Can’t Bill for Progress Notes

    Over the years, we’ve received a lot of questions on the WebPT Blog—and one of the most frequently asked ones has to do with the difference between patient progress notes and re-evaluations, specifically in relation to billing. To be perfectly clear, Medicare will not pay for a progress note. According to compliance expert Tom Ambury , “It is not appropriate to bill...when reporting ‘normal predictable progress’”—regardless of the timing or whether “a more thorough assessment is being …

  • Do You Know Your Modifiers? [Quiz] Image

    articleJul 29, 2015 | 1 min. read

    Do You Know Your Modifiers? [Quiz]

    It’s a mad, mad, mad, mad Medicare world, and unfortunately, just about every regulation requires a modifier. If you apply the wrong modifier—or forget one entirely—then your clinic suffers decreased payments or flat-out denials. Even worse, if you amass enough modifier mistakes, you make your practice vulnerable to an audit. Worried you’re miserable at modifiers or want confirmation that you’re actually a modifier master? Take our 10-question quiz below to test your modifier know-how.    

  • Let’s Take “Skilled and Reasonable” to Another Level Image

    articleNov 17, 2015 | 8 min. read

    Let’s Take “Skilled and Reasonable” to Another Level

    Many WebPT Members and Blog readers already are familiar with the importance of providing documentation that satisfies the requirements set forth by payers and regulatory agencies. But, did you know there are additional important reasons for providing excellent documentation? That’s exactly what we’re going to talk about today. In the past few years, review processes for outpatient therapy documentation have become more detailed: Technical compliance is held to a more consistent standard. We’ve seen this with the …

  • 5 Things You Need to Know About Medicare Audits Image

    articleJul 16, 2014 | 6 min. read

    5 Things You Need to Know About Medicare Audits

    If you treat Medicare patients, then you know all-too-well that the only thing worse than having to understand—and follow—Medicare’s thick book o’ rules is having to worry about the ever-present threat of a potential audit. After all, the national media love a good fraud story , and even if you’re fairly confident that you are doing everything right, each breaking audit headline probably plants a small seed of worry somewhere deep in your subconscious. With that in …

  • MAC Madness: When and How to Contact Your Medicare Contractor Image

    articleNov 4, 2016 | 4 min. read

    MAC Madness: When and How to Contact Your Medicare Contractor

    Medicare providers have a lot of challenges to contend with—and meeting those challenges can be tough. But, you don’t always have to go it alone, because while you can’t always count on CMS to provide clear guidance on how to comply with all the regulations that apply to you, you do have other resources at your disposal when you need answers—quick. Let’s talk about one such resource: your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC). Your Medicare Go-To Even if …

  • 6 Surefire Signs Medicare Will Audit Your PT Practice (and How to Fix 'Em) Image

    articleNov 30, 2017 | 7 min. read

    6 Surefire Signs Medicare Will Audit Your PT Practice (and How to Fix 'Em)

    Camping season may be over, but I’m in the mood to tell a scary campfire story. So, here goes: It’s an average work day. Your last patient just left, and you’ve got a little downtime between appointments to grab a cup of coffee and catch up on documentation. As you sit down at your desk, you notice a stack of envelopes. “The mail must’ve come early today,” you think to yourself. As you thumb through the advertisements …

  • Maintenance, Medicare, and Medical Necessity: Unpacking the Jimmo Update Image

    articleOct 5, 2017 | 5 min. read

    Maintenance, Medicare, and Medical Necessity: Unpacking the Jimmo Update

    Hey, have you heard the good news? CMS has completed all required action items laid out in the Jimmo v. Sebelius settlement. If you’re scratching your head and wondering why that matters, here’s the rundown: a few years ago, a group of Medicare providers alleged that CMS contractors made determinations on claims for skilled care based on an inappropriate “Improvement Standard.” These providers took CMS to court, and the court determined that CMS needed to clarify and …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.