In an age of increased regulations and reduced fee schedules, turning a profit in the outpatient rehab therapy industry is tougher than ever. And for the past five years—going on six—it’s been particularly tough for those therapists who treat a lot of Medicare patients.

That’s because, under a policy called multiple procedure payment reduction (MPPR), CMS won't pay claims in full when a PT, OT, or SLP performs more than one related procedure on a patient during the same visit. Talk about a wake-up call to diversify your payer mix. So, while you can expect to continue seeing smaller checks from Medicare under MPPR, how can your clinic contend with this policy—and, more importantly, make the decrease in payment more manageable?

Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Regular BannerTriumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Small Banner

Defining MPPR

In 2011, CMS began rolling out MPPR—and, in the process, complicated the lives of PTs, OTs, and SLPs even more. Under the current form of this rule, rehab therapists who perform more than one “always therapy service” on a patient during the same visit see a 50% cut to the practice expense (PE) that he or she bills to Medicare. (According to CMS, a qualified therapist can only bill “always therapy” codes when the service is provided under the patient’s plan of care.) During the pioneer days of MPPR—January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2013—CMS implemented a 20% reduction on the PE for outpatient therapy providers; the agency then increased the cut to 50% on April 1, 2013. And no, that wasn’t an April Fool’s Day prank.

In addition to affecting reimbursement for multiple services provided by the same practitioner, MPPR extends across disciplines when two or more rehab therapists treat the same patient during the same date of service. To better put things into perspective, if a patient received OT on the same day as PT, CMS would pay the highest procedure value in full and would then reduce payment for all subsequent procedures performed that day by 50% of the PE component. Now, according to PT Chuck Felder, that’s no insignificant cut, because the PE typically accounts for about half of the total payment for each code. Plus, there’s this little tidbit: the APTA estimates that MPPR, on average, reduces provider reimbursement between 6% and 7% for outpatient therapy services (based on an average of 3.7 billed units per visit). Talk about a policy that’s difficult to stomach.

Cutting Unnecessary Costs

Part of the reason why CMS implemented its MPPR policy is because the agency grew tired of continuing to pay for pre- and post-service activities that fall under the practice expense. (While each therapy service includes three components—work expense, practice expense, and malpractice expense—the MPPR applies only to the PE payment). In particular, because the PE is attached to each therapy procedure, CMS believes it’s “overpaying for that prep time when more than one procedure is performed in a day for that patient.” More to the point: CMS designed its MPPR policy to avoid this type of duplicate payment. But, that doesn’t mean advocates within the rehab therapy industry are sitting quietly, doing nothing.

Contending with the Reductions

The APTA continues to assert that MPPR is a flawed policy, because the PE values that providers submit to Medicare have, over time, been reduced. Furthermore, the APTA contends that the time rehab therapists spend on pre- and post-service activities continue to be evenly distributed across three units of service (or 45 minutes of treatment time). Therefore, the APTA believes CMS’s decision to make continued cuts to the practice expense of therapy service codes is not only arbitrary, but also “likely to restrict patient access to vital physical therapy services.” And because several third-party insurance carriers have also adopted this CMS policy, the APTA suggests providers not put all their eggs in one basket. In other words, clinic owners should look to diversify their payer mixes and not rely on Medicare as a sole source of income.

Looking Forward to the Future

For the time being, rehab therapists will continue to lose 50% in PE payments for any additional “always therapy” services he or she provides to a Medicare patient during the same treatment session. Confused about how to calculate MPPR? The APTA has rolled out an updated version of its Medicare reimbursement calculator to help therapists determine what they should expect to be reimbursed for each procedure.

Over the years, Medicare hasn’t shied away from making the billing process confusing and difficult to navigate—hence, the introduction of programs like MPPR. So, what should PTs, OTs, and SLPs do to manage decreased Medicare payments? Every clinic has different needs, but therapists should certainly revisit their payer contracts to make sure they are not unnecessarily—or unknowingly—agreeing to these types of reductions. Alternatively, practices can add cash-based services to their offerings—thus allowing patients to receive treatment on a pay-as-you-go basis—to help fill in the revenue gaps created by payment reduction programs. How are you contending with MPPR in your practice? What strategies have you adopted or considered, and which ideas have worked or fallen short? Share your experience in the comment section below.

  • Why Medicare-Enrolled PTs Can't Always Provide Treatment on a Cash-Pay Basis Image

    articleOct 27, 2016 | 3 min. read

    Why Medicare-Enrolled PTs Can't Always Provide Treatment on a Cash-Pay Basis

    Even if you feel comfortable with all things Medicare, chances are there’s a new rule in the works ( oh, looky here ) that could trip you up. Yes, the rules are always changing—and even the ones that have been in place for a while could get you stuck in a pickle (mmm, pickles). That’s especially true with the rules around providing treatment on a cash-pay basis , because your restrictions and obligations vary based on your …

  • articleNov 16, 2010 | 2 min. read

    Continued Medicare cuts and caps will affect therapy patients and providers in 2011

    The American Physical Therapy Association(APTA) is keeping its members informed about continued cuts and caps for Medicare beneficiaries. In an attempt to control cost, Medicare patients continue to see limitations on their service and the hardest hit areas are long-term rehabilitation care and outpatient services. The hardest hit by these cuts are our nation's seniors and disabled and the providers that service them. Payment cuts and caps on services will affect patients and providers in 2011 Medicare …

  • Your Roadmap to ICD-10 Image

    articleOct 10, 2013 | 5 min. read

    Your Roadmap to ICD-10

    By now you’ve already—hopefully—heard the news about the big ICD-10 transition that’s going down on October 1, 2015. But, if you’re like most US healthcare providers—about 75%, according to this article —you haven’t exactly stuck to the suggested preparatory timelines that CMS released a while back. We get it; you’re busy, and the last thing you have time for is sitting down and mapping out a plan of action for your clinic’s transition to ICD-10. But putting …

  • Common Questions from Our New PT and OT Evaluation Codes Webinar Image

    articleDec 19, 2016 | 20 min. read

    Common Questions from Our New PT and OT Evaluation Codes Webinar

    This month’s webinar on the new CPT codes was our biggest one yet—more than 11,000 people registered to attend. With such a large—and clinically diverse—audience, we received a ton of questions. And due to time constraints, our hosts—WebPT’s own Heidi Jannenga and compliance expert Rick Gawenda—weren’t able to get to even a fraction of them during the live broadcast. Not to worry, though; we’ve done our best to answer them all here, in one giant FAQ article. …

  • Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes Image

    articleNov 3, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes

    Over the last several years, healthcare providers in general—and rehab therapists, specifically—have been hit with a seemingly constant barrage of regulatory requirements. And the vast majority of these initiatives—PQRS, functional limitation reporting, MPPR, ICD-10, and the like—have either: Had a direct negative impact on our payments, or Forced us to devote extra time to satisfying the criteria of the requirements—with zero compensation for that time. So, it should come as no surprise that the rehab therapy community …

  • Farewell, 97001: How to Use the New PT and OT Evaluation Codes Image

    articleOct 12, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Farewell, 97001: How to Use the New PT and OT Evaluation Codes

    Hear ye, hear ye: We hereby declare that as of January 1, 2017, all PTs and OTs must begin using a new set of CPT codes to bill for therapy evaluations and re-evaluations. Actually, if we are being perfectly accurate, we’re not declaring anything; CMS and the AMA are—and we’re merely the messengers. You might find it hard to believe, but with this CPT coding update, the evaluation and re-evaluation codes that PTs and OTs have come …

  • Cashing In on Private Pay: The PT's Guide to Going Out-of-Network Image

    webinarJul 27, 2017

    Cashing In on Private Pay: The PT's Guide to Going Out-of-Network

    For many rehab therapists, submitting a claim to a third-party payer feels a lot like pulling the lever on a slot machine. You never know for sure what you’re gonna get—and most of the time, it’s less than you’d hoped for. With seemingly ever-increasing regulations—and constantly shrinking reimbursements—it’s no wonder so many PTs, OTs, and SLPs feel like the financial odds are stacked against them. [video://] As a result, more and more rehab therapy providers are trying …

  • 5 Medicare Compliance Issues for Cash-Based PTs Image

    articleNov 20, 2018 | 6 min. read

    5 Medicare Compliance Issues for Cash-Based PTs

    Cash-based physical therapy practices are all the rage these days, and with good reason. They give PTs the opportunity to focus on providing quality care—without the pressure of altering treatments or billing practices to keep insurance payers happy. At the same time, PTs can get into hot water if they blindly accept cash from anyone willing to pay. And things get especially hairy when it comes to Medicare patients. So, can a Medicare patient pay out of …

  • Video Tutorial: Selecting the Correct Complexity Level for PT and OT Evals Image

    articleOct 13, 2016 | 1 min. read

    Video Tutorial: Selecting the Correct Complexity Level for PT and OT Evals

    The holidays will be here before we know it—and that means PTs and OTs will be required to use the new evaluation and re-evaluation CPT codes before we know it, too. And these codes bring with them the gift of complexity. But, unlike that snowman sweater from Great Aunt Sheila, therapists can't exchange these codes; so, whether they want to or not, PTs and OTs have to learn the ins and outs of coding for evaluative complexity …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.