Bill Gates once said, “I choose a lazy person to do a hard job, because a lazy person will find an easy way to do it.” Perhaps that explains the existence of CliffsNotes, infographics, quick guides, flowcharts, cheat sheets, automated crosswalks, and a slew of other “shortcuts.” But just because there’s an easier way to do a hard job doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the right way. This is especially true when it comes to ICD-10 in the rehab therapy industry.

The US healthcare system switches to ICD-10 in a few weeks, and major players in industries with oodles of money—like hospital networks—have allocated plenty of resources to preparing their systems and staffs for the transition. But in the land of private practice—especially PT, OT, and SLP—profit margins are much more narrow. And as a result, practice owners and clinicians have had to get much more creative and frugal with their prep work. For this reason, I can totally understand the allure of cheat sheets. It seems so simple, right? A single page of therapists’ most commonly used ICD-9 codes with their corresponding ICD-10 equivalents. These uber-convenient one-pagers lead you to believe that all you need to do is print a couple copies, tape them up around the clinic, and bam! You’re ready for ICD-10. But the problem with this plan lies right in the document’s name: cheat sheet. And I’m not sure who said it first, but cheaters never prosper.

The healthcare industry has been freaking out about ICD-10 for years now—so much so that they’ve successfully delayed the transition three times. If the transition to ICD-10 could genuinely be boiled down into a cheat sheet, don’t you think we would’ve all made the switch long ago?

So, what specifically is wrong with ICD-10 cheat sheets for rehab therapists? Two words: pain codes. These are the most commonly used ICD-9 codes for PTs. In ICD-10, though, you shouldn’t use a pain code as a patient’s primary diagnosis if you can help it. ICD-10 requires a far greater degree of specificity; thus, payers want you to code for the underlying injury or condition first and foremost. Only then should you list the pain codes associated with the main diagnosis. Furthermore, some of the cheat sheets I’ve come across list “Pain in unspecified limb” as one of the ICD-10 codes therapists should reference. As I said before, ICD-10 requires you to code to the highest possible level of specificity, and “Pain in unspecified limb” doesn’t meet that standard. Why? Because you, as the therapist, should definitely know which limb is in pain.

Lastly, these cheat sheets fail to account for the seventh character, which is an absolute must for injury codes. So, if you relied solely on a cheat sheet to tell you the proper diagnosis code for a particular case, you would leave yourself vulnerable to not only using a pain code as your primary diagnosis—a big no-no—but also using incomplete codes, as the cheat sheet probably wouldn’t include instructions for affixing the correct seventh character (A, D, or S) to any codes requiring one. Why? Because as this blog post points out, “...there’s no ICD-9 equivalent of the seventh character.” Beyond that, selecting the right seventh character requires you to use your clinical expertise to determine the phase of treatment. For all of these reasons, depending entirely on a crosswalking cheat sheet could spell disaster for your practice in the form of denials or insufficient reimbursements.

Now, all of this is not to say that cheat sheets can’t be helpful, especially if they include ICD-10 equivalents of non-pain ICD-9 codes. I’m simply providing a word of caution: Don’t put all of your eggs in the cheat sheet basket. These types of charts can certainly be one resource in your robust training kit—after all, you will use pain codes as secondary diagnosis codes on many treatment plans—but they should never be the end all be all.

There are a lot of vendors out there providing all sorts of resources—including cheat sheets—to help you and your clinic better prepare for the switch. But, it’s on you to avoid the “lazy” way of doing things (i.e., steering clear of cheat sheets). Instead, amass—and thoughtfully review—all of the resources you can get your hands on, and institute proper training in your practice. Here are some materials I recommend:

Lastly, you can avoid cheat sheets altogether by simply using a documentation platform that has an intelligent and interactive ICD-10 coding tool. Take WebPT, for example. Our ICD-10 code picker allows you to search by injury, condition, partial phrases, ICD-10 code, or ICD-9 code—and we’ll alert you if greater specificity is possible with any particular code. Want to see the tool for yourself? Register now for our ICD-10 Crash Course webinar or request a free, online demonstration.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner
  • ICD-10 Open Forum Image

    webinarOct 5, 2015

    ICD-10 Open Forum

    On October 1, the US officially said RIP to ICD-9 and brought ICD-10 to life. For some of you, the transition might’ve been all sugar and spice—a real treat. But for many others, the switch to the new code set might’ve left you feeling overwhelmed, tricked, or even a bit scared. At the very least, you might be haunted by some lingering questions. That’s where we can help. We’ve brewed a cauldron filled to the brim with …

  • Founder Letter: Is the ICD-10 Period of Flexibility Your Saving Grace? Image

    articleAug 6, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: Is the ICD-10 Period of Flexibility Your Saving Grace?

    Transitions aren’t always easy. And as the mother of a young daughter, I’m more than familiar with the frustration and tantrums that can come as a result of change. But as professionals in the healthcare industry, we don’t have time for tears or frowny faces—especially when it comes to  ICD-10 . With under two months to go before the big transition, there’s no room for meltdowns; we need to put our heads down and take on the …

  • History of ICD-10 Image

    articleFeb 17, 2015 | 5 min. read

    History of ICD-10

    If you haven’t heard of ICD-10 by now, you’ve probably been living under a rock . Though CMS has talked about the impending implementation of ICD-10 like a boy crying “Wolf!,” the days of false alarms are over—at least that’s what the experts are saying . That’s right: it’s finally happening, folks. And the mandatory transition to the new diagnosis code set will be here before we know it (even if it is 20 years late). Let’s …

  • The History of ICD-10 Image

    articleOct 9, 2013 | 3 min. read

    The History of ICD-10

    As we’ve stated in previous blog posts, the US will transition to ICD-10 codes on October 1, 2015—to some of you, that might seem like a quickly approaching date. Others might be wondering, “What’s the rush?” Know that it only seems hurried now because of pesky procrastination. To truly understand this, we must delve into the history of ICD-10. In the beginning... The World Health Organization (WHO), the public health sector of the United Nations, which focuses …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ Image

    articleSep 1, 2015 | 21 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ

    Yesterday, we hosted the largest webinar in WebPT history . Thousands of rehab therapy professionals attended the live session, which focused on ICD-10 coding examples . As expected, we received a lot of questions. Below is a collection of the webinar’s most frequently asked questions. The Seventh Character Craze What is the seventh character? The seventh character didn’t exist in ICD-9 , so it’s caused a great deal of confusion. Essentially, it’s a mechanism for applying greater …

  • Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World Image

    articleOct 28, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World

    Some of you might remember all of the hype around Y2K. Rumors and speculation were abuzz, and there were people who thought all hell was going to break loose when the clock struck midnight on January 1, 2000. And then—dun, dun, dun—nothing happened. The Hyperbolic Hype The lead-up to October 1 was similar in many respects, albeit on a much smaller scale. People all over the healthcare community were freaking out about the unknown; some large practices …

  • Don’t Let ICD-10 and Direct Access Bug You Image

    articleAug 13, 2015 | 7 min. read

    Don’t Let ICD-10 and Direct Access Bug You

    Obviously, there’s been quite a buzz surrounding ICD-10; and providers throughout the country are making a tremendous effort to figure out exactly how the transition is going to affect us all . And just like a winged—and busy—bug that won’t stop whizzing past your ear, the noise isn’t likely to die down anytime soon. And that’s for good reason: the ICD-10 transition is a big one, and there are many factors rehab therapists have to consider when …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux Image

    articleSep 24, 2015 | 16 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux

    Just when we thought we’d gotten every ICD-10 question under the sun, we got, well, more questions. Like, a lot more. But, we take that as a good sign, because like a scrappy reporter trying to get to the bottom of a big story, our audience of blog readers and webinar attendees aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions—which means they’re serious about preparing themselves for the changes ahead. And we’re equally serious about providing them with …

  • Will ICD-10 End the Paper Superbill? Image

    articleSep 8, 2015 | 2 min. read

    Will ICD-10 End the Paper Superbill?

    In a dark world filled with endless paperwork and thousands of billing codes, rehab therapy clinics need a hero. Many medical professionals would say their office hero is the paper superbill. It’s fast, convenient, and easy to use. But hold on to your spandex tights, because ICD-10 is coming—and it might just be the paper superbill’s kryptonite . Here’s why the ICD-10 paper superbill just doesn’t work: It’s longer. ICD-9 has around 13,000 codes, so your paper …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.