As 2019 looms, we've been getting a lot of questions about Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)—specifically, whether or not all physical, occupational, and speech therapists need to report and, if there is a penalty, how to avoid it. These are both great questions—and luckily, fairly easy ones to answer. But one of the reasons why there is so much confusion swirling about Medicare's latest reporting program is that there's a lot of misleading information—and even some fear-mongering—swirling through our industry as well. So, if you're looking for the truth, you've come to the right place. And contrary to what you may have heard, the bottom line is that not every PT, OT, or SLP practice will have to participate in MIPS in 2019, and—based on the proposed participation criteria—most WebPT Members won't be required to do so. In fact, according to APTA Program Director for Quality Heather Smith, PT, MPH—in conversation with the APTA Public Policy and Advocacy Committee—only about 10% of all physical therapists will meet the participation requirements. With that in mind, here's what you can actually expect in terms of MIPS 2019 for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology—without any over-dramatization or scare-you-into-buying-something-we-just-so-happen-to-offer shenanigans:

Regulatory Roundup: 6 Challenges Confronting Rehab Therapists in 2018 - Regular BannerRegulatory Roundup: 6 Challenges Confronting Rehab Therapists in 2018 - Small Banner

1. Providers in private practice can only participate in MIPS if they meet specific criteria.

You are required to participate in 2019 if, between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2018 (plus a 30-day claims runout period during which providers can still submit claims for services rendered during that window), you:

  • Served more than 200 Medicare Part B beneficiaries;
  • Provided more than 200 professional services* to Medicare Part B beneficiaries; and
  • Billed Medicare for more than $90,000 in Part B services.

*According to CMS—on page 920 of the final rule—“A clinician may identify and monitor a claim to distinguish covered professional services [bullet two above] from Part B items and services [bullet three above] by calculating one professional claim line with positive allowed charges to be considered one covered professional service.”

If none of these criteria apply to you, then you are excluded from participating. And if one or two apply, then you may opt in—but you're not required to do so. Additionally, according to the APTA, groups who collectively meet at least one of the criteria listed above may opt in.

According to compliance expert Rick Gawenda in a presentation he gave at WebPT's 2018 Ascend summit, providers are also excluded if they are “newly enrolled in the Medicare program for the first time during the performance period” or “are significantly participating in advanced APMs [alternative payment models].”

Now, even if you are excluded, you can still report data on a voluntary basis; however, you still would not be considered an eligible provider, and therefore would not be subject to any payment adjustments or incentives. To verify your status with CMS, use this link after the determination period has ended.

It's also important to note that CMS has added a second eligibility determination period—beginning on October 1 of the calendar year preceding the applicable performance period and ending on September 30 of the calendar year in which the applicable performance period occurs—to account “for the identification of additional, previously unidentified individual eligible clinicians and groups who do not exceed the low-volume threshold or meet other special circumstances.” In other words—even if you're not eligible based on the initial determination period—you'll want to continue to monitor your eligibility going forward, especially if you switch practices mid-way through the determination period.

2. Providers can participate individually or as a group.

Just like with PQRS—the quote-unquote “predecessor” to MIPS—providers can participate in MIPS individually or as a group. According to WebPT compliance expert Dianne Jewell, “Group reporting [may be] more advantageous because performance is aggregated. However, reporting as a group means [that] all [therapists] must participate regardless of their status.” In other words, if your clinic has three providers—two who are eligible to participate individually and one who is not—and you decide to participate as a group, then all three providers must join in.

Now, MIPS is also allowing solo providers—and groups of 10 or fewer eligible providers—to come together virtually and report as a group in a given year. Interestingly enough, CMS hasn't put any restrictions on specialty or location for MIPS reporting groups. So in theory, you could team up with providers in different disciplines to report—if you feel so inclined.

3. Participating PTs and OTs will complete the requirements in two performance categories: Quality and Improvement Activities.

While there are four total MIPS categories, only two apply to PTs and OTs in 2019. Eligible providers will need to submit all applicable quality measures for all 12 months in 2019 with at least 60% completeness—and attest to an approved performance improvement activity for at least 90 days. According to Gawenda, “The points from each performance category are added together to give you a MIPS Final Score. The MIPS Final Score is compared to the MIPS performance threshold to determine if you receive a positive, negative, or neutral payment adjustment.”

Currently, there are four available measures for PT and OT (as well as the CMS-approved FOTO measures):

  1. BMI
  2. Medications
  3. Pain
  4. Functional Outcomes

You can learn more about the quality measures on CMS's Quality Payment Program site. As it stands, CMS has weighted Quality at 85% and Improvement Activities at 15% for providers who are not participating in the Promoting Interoperability performance category—including PTs, OTs, and SLPs. Speaking of SLPs, we're in the process of determining which measures will apply to qualified SLPs. Stay tuned for more information on that.

Important note: While PRM software is a wonderful asset to have in your practice—and you can use it to satisfy the improvement activity requirement—it's not a requirement by any means, regardless of what you might have heard from an overzealous EMR company that is trying to scare therapists into purchasing its product.

4. The maximum potential bonus is a 7% increase, and the maximum penalty is a 7% reduction.

According to Jewell, MIPS is a budget-neutral program, so there must be enough submission failures to enable the bonuses. In other words, there is no guarantee that even if you qualify for an incentive, you will receive the maximum—or anything at all. That means that there is risk in MIPS participation. And while I know that's what will turn most of you away from opting in, risk isn't really what you should be afraid of. Instead, you should be afraid of the long-term repercussions of Medicare not having data of a great enough volume or diversity to make sound decisions about our future—including our payments.

In fact, we should be actively seeking out payment structures that incorporate risk, because the entire healthcare industry is heading into a value-based paradigm. Eventually, risk will be one of the biggest ways—if not the only way—for us to increase our payment rates. So, shouldn't we be eager and ready to provide value-based data that confirms what we already know about our profession—namely, that we have the ability to help our patients achieve outstanding outcomes and have a wonderful experience, all at a cost that's significantly lower than many other, more invasive interventions? We should be betting on our profession—and ourselves. And we should be doing that on our own terms. That is, by putting skin in this game, collecting our own data, and exploring risk-based (i.e., value-based) reimbursement models with commercial payers, too. After all, history has shown us that whatever path Medicare takes, other payers will eventually follow.

5. There are things you can do to prepare now.

Now that we know the specifics from the final rule, we're figuring out how WebPT can best support our Members through this next phase of required quality data reporting. And you can bet we're doing everything in our power to make MIPS compliance as easy and straightforward as possible. In fact, we're still a certified registry, so our Members will still have a convenient registry-based reporting option—just as they did for PQRS. In the meantime, though, Jewell has some suggestions for how practices can prepare themselves:

  • Tally up your PTs, OTs, and SLPs so you can figure out your TIN size and potential success threshold.
  • If you track your payer mix by therapist, use that data to guesstimate who—if any—of your providers will be required to participate based on Medicare patients served.
  • If you're already familiar with PQRS, then you should feel pretty comfortable with the MIPS quality measures. If you're not, brush up on them here.
  • Visit the Quality Payment Program (QPP) site to read about the improvement activities that were approved in 2018. While there are some proposed changes to these activities for 2019, last year's activities should still give you a good idea of what might be feasible for your practice.
  • Watch the complimentary webinar that Jewell and I hosted to help PTs, OTs, and SLPs unwrap MIPS and the final rule—and prepare for 2019. Then, check out the post-webinar FAQ as well as our comprehensive MIPS guide.

Most of you reading this right now won't be required to participate in MIPS in 2019, which means you have a choice—one that only you can make based on the specifics of your practice and your own best judgement. That said, I encourage all of you to commit to not making that decision out of fear, but instead looking ahead at where we're heading as an industry and what our goals are for ourselves and our patients.

MIPS is here—and its data will be yet another opportunity for us to demonstrate our value and impact future payment structures. What do you think?

  • Founder Letter: Dodging Data will be Your Demise (or, Why You Should Complete PQRS)  Image

    articleNov 5, 2015 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: Dodging Data will be Your Demise (or, Why You Should Complete PQRS)

    By and large, Medicare’s 2016 Final Rule was underwhelming—and for most of us (including me), that probably warranted a big sigh of relief. But while there are no major changes on deck for this year, one thing that definitely should have caught your eye if you perused our Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule was the verbiage alluding to the future of PQRS—specifically, the possibility that PQRS reporting as we know it could cease to exist …

  • articleNov 5, 2013 | 3 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS 2014

    Well, it’s November already, and that means two things: Thanksgiving and Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Sure, PQRS doesn’t involve mouthwatering roasted turkey, savory stuffing, or creamy mashed potatoes, but it has become quite the November tradition for us here at WebPT. You see, this is the time of year that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) typically confirms the details of next year’s reporting requirements, thus allowing us to update our PQRS solution (claims- …

  • Denied but Not Dead: How to Submit a Medicare Appeal Image

    articleOct 15, 2018 | 9 min. read

    Denied but Not Dead: How to Submit a Medicare Appeal

    You know the drill: you provided Medicare-covered, medically necessary services to a patient who has active Medicare coverage. And yet, for some reason, CMS denied your claim. While you could chalk it up to a complicated government payer system and write off the costs of those services, that may not be the best solution—especially if you have the documentation to support the validity of your claim. In that case, you may very well want to appeal Medicare’s …

  • PQRS 2016 FAQ Image

    articleDec 10, 2015 | 17 min. read

    PQRS 2016 FAQ

    Yesterday, we hosted a webinar focused on PQRS 2016. We received a lot of questions during the live session—so many, in fact, that we’ve amassed them here in a handy FAQ. Got a question and don’t see an answer below? Ask it in the comment section at the bottom of this post. Eligibility Do I have to participate in PQRS? What makes me an eligible provider? If you are a healthcare professional providing services paid under or …

  • The Cap is Gone, But KX Lives On: How to Handle Therapy Claims in 2018 Image

    articleApr 9, 2018 | 5 min. read

    The Cap is Gone, But KX Lives On: How to Handle Therapy Claims in 2018

    It happened in the middle of the night: after months of debate and hours of back and forth that went until 3 AM on February 9, 2018, the Senate voted 71-28 in favor of a stopgap budget bill—known as the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018—that officially repealed the Medicare cap on therapy services . PTs, OTs, and SLPs around the country—especially those with Medicare claims sitting in limbo as they awaited further instruction from CMS—breathed a collective …

  • articleNov 6, 2013 | 2 min. read

    Functional Limitation Reporting in a Nutshell

    Hopefully, you’ve been working your functional limitation reporting (FLR) magic for months now, so you’ve got it down pat. If not, you’re probably running into more than your fair share of claim denials. Don’t worry; we’re here to help. Here are some FLR basics in a convenient chestnut shell. (It is almost that time of the year , after all). What is FLR? Beginning July 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require that …

  • Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments Image

    articleMay 4, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments

    It’s official: rehab therapists are just a sashay away from exiting the PQRS dance floor. That’s because last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed final rule that, if adopted, will put into effect the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). And that, in turn, will give the green light to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , a brand spankin’-new quality data reporting program that consolidates PQRS , …

  • Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes Image

    articleNov 3, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: My Evaluation of the New PT and OT Eval Codes

    Over the last several years, healthcare providers in general—and rehab therapists, specifically—have been hit with a seemingly constant barrage of regulatory requirements. And the vast majority of these initiatives—PQRS, functional limitation reporting, MPPR, ICD-10, and the like—have either: Had a direct negative impact on our payments, or Forced us to devote extra time to satisfying the criteria of the requirements—with zero compensation for that time. So, it should come as no surprise that the rehab therapy community …

  • PQRS 2015 Measures Image

    articleNov 17, 2014 | 1 min. read

    PQRS 2015 Measures

    While PQRS measures specifications won’t be available until December, we do know which individual measures are available for 2015. Here’s the breakdown by specialty: PT #126 Diabetes Foot/Ankle Evaluation #127 Diabetes - Footwear Evaluation #128 BMI screening #130 Current Medications #131 Pain Assessment #154 Falls Risk Assessment #155 Falls POC #182 Functional Outcome Assessment OT #128 BMI screening #130 Current Medications #131 Pain Assessment #154 Falls Risk Assessment #155 Falls POC #134 Preventative Screening Clinical Depression #173 …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.