Party popper Before you break out the noisemakers, be sure to RSVP for our special December 15 webinar on the new PT and OT evaluation CPT codes for 2017. Register now.


Recently, the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) shared their highlights of the 2014 Proposed Physician Fee Schedule Rule. This summary boils down the 605-page proposal from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) into a 16-page bulleted outline. The breakdown is incredibly helpful, and we definitely recommend you read it. However, we know that not everyone is an APTA Member, and many of you are crunched for time. So, we sat down with our Founder and PT Heidi Jannenga to develop an even more condensed rundown of the pros and cons of this proposal—a synopsis of the synopsis, if you will. 

Remember, if passed, this rule will directly impact you and your practice. Thus, we absolutely must clamor for the pros and boisterously oppose the cons. With this in mind, let us emphasize that this proposal is simply that: a proposal. None of these rules are law—yet. We can impact the outcome of every single item CMS has proposed.

How? If you’re an APTA Member, then you have until September 6, 2013, to submit comments in response to this rule. The APTA will gather those comments and submit them on behalf of its members.

If you’re not an APTA Member, then you can submit comments using one of the four methods listed on page two of the full CMS proposal. You can also share your thoughts in the comments section below. Heidi, who is a member of the APTA, will then include your feedback in the comments she submits to the APTA.

WebPT + Billing Software - Regular BannerWebPT + Billing Software - Small Banner

Pros

  • Nothing would change regarding the therapy cap or functional limitation reporting.
  • There would be a net increase of 1% to the total allowable charges for physical and occupational therapy.
  • There is potential for a new payment under the fee schedule for complex chronic care management services starting in 2015. This change could allow for better management of services for patients with complex chronic conditions that put the patient at “significant risk of death, acute exacerbation/decomposition, or functional decline.”
  • Revised regulations regarding payment for “incident to” services would require any individual performing ‘incident to’ services to meet “applicable state requirements to provide the services, including licensure.” While we’re not fans of physician-owned physical therapy services (POPTS), we view this legislation as a good thing because it prevents physicians from billing under their own names for therapy services provided by in-house personnel who may or may not be qualified to perform such services. This ensures physicians are hiring licensed physical therapists to provide therapy services. The proposed legislation also would reduce incidences of fraud and would elevate the standard of care for PT services within POPTS.  
  • Group Physician Reporting Option (GPRO) would be available again in 2014, allowing two or more providers in the same practice to submit their PQRS measures as a group, as long as the practice submits via a registry.
  • For both claims-based and registry-based PQRS, individual eligible professionals would be required to report on each measure for at least 50% of the eligible professional's Medicare Part B FFS patients. To compare, those submitting PQRS via registry in 2013 had to report on 80% of qualified patients.
  • For registry-based PQRS, CMS proposes that eligible professionals complete PQRS not only for Medicare patients, but also for those using Medicare replacement and advantage plans. Why is this good? More data hopefully means better payment structures in the future. And if you’re filing PQRS through a certified registry, then your PQRS data will have a direct impact on forthcoming CMS decisions.
  • In calendar year (CY) 2014, providers who satisfactorily report data on PQRS quality measures will earn a 0.5% incentive payment on their total allowed charges during the reporting period.
  • According to this proposal, CMS is working toward eliminating claims-based PQRS entirely, beginning in the CY 2017 reporting period. This would be beneficial to the therapy industry because it would lead to the collection of higher-quality patient data with less chance for error. Furthermore, registry-based reporting is far less time-consuming for the provider.
  • CMS also plans to continue expanding and improving the Physician Compare Website, an online resource that makes PQRS data available to the public as required by the Affordable Care Act.

Cons

  • “Due to the flawed SGR [sustainable growth rate] formula, CMS projects that the physician fee schedule update for CY 2014 is estimated to be negative 24.4%.” Barring government action, that means this rule could reduce your fee schedule by almost a quarter of its total value. Congress may avert this cut—as it has in recent years—but it is up to us and other organizations to convince our government representatives to stop this payment reduction. If they succeed in doing so, “the rule on outpatient physical therapy services in aggregate would be a positive 1% in 2014.”
  • In 2013, CMS required practitioners to report at least three measures for PQRS. However, they’re proposing the following changes for 2014:
  • For claims-based reporting, individual eligible professionals will report:
    • at least nine measures, covering at least three of the National Quality Strategy domains
    • one to eight measures if fewer than nine measures apply to the eligible professional
  • For registry-based reporting, individual eligible professionals would report:
    • at least nine measures, covering at least three of the National Quality Strategy domains
  • Penalties for failing to successfully participate in PQRS will begin in CY 2015 and will be based on CY 2013 data, while penalties for CY 2016 will be based on CY 2014 data.
  • According to this rule, beginning in 2014 you must report on at least 50% of your patients in order to avoid the penalty. (In 2013, you only needed to report on one patient to avoid the penalty.)
  • There you have it: the pros and cons. Now take action. Share your feedback on the proposal in the comments section below as well as through one of the routes listed above.
  • Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments Image

    articleMay 4, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments

    It’s official: rehab therapists are just a sashay away from exiting the PQRS dance floor. That’s because last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed final rule that, if adopted, will put into effect the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). And that, in turn, will give the green light to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , a brand spankin’-new quality data reporting program that consolidates PQRS , …

  • Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits Image

    articleOct 17, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits

    After months of heated debate and public commentary—much of it coming from physicians who felt they needed more time to prepare themselves to participate in a brand-new quality reporting program—the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on Friday released its final rule on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) . This act, which will go into effect January 1, 2017, reimburses eligible Medicare physicians based on the quality of care they deliver …

  • Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Halloween may be over, but if you didn’t get your fill of scares, I’ve got the perfect activity for you: reading through 1, 401 pages of pure Medicare gobbledygook. Screaming yet? (Or should I check back at around page 500?) I kid, of course; there’s no need for you to slog through this year’s extra meaty Final Rule , because we’ve done all the slogging for you. (That way, you can save your appetite for a nice, …

  • articleNov 4, 2013 | 3 min. read

    What PQRS Could Look Like in 2014

    On July 19, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register. According to this summary , most of the policies were open for comment until September 6, 2013 and, pending final decisions (which hopefully will occur this month), will take effect on January 1, 2014. The 605-page document contains proposals for policy changes on everything from reimbursements to the …

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. Questions related to: • WebPT • Modifier 59 • Other Modifiers • Coding • ICD-10 • …

  • Gifts, Donations, and Discounts: What Medicare Needs You to Know Image

    articleJul 24, 2014 | 6 min. read

    Gifts, Donations, and Discounts: What Medicare Needs You to Know

    The world of private practice physical therapy is certainly competitive, so it makes sense that owners and directors consider every angle when it comes to promoting their businesses. Unfortunately, some of those angles can get you and your practice in hot water with Medicare. Today, I’ll discuss handling gifts, donations, and discounts in a way that doesn’t rile up the big M. But before I launch into that, here’s a legal primer: Stark Law vs. Federal Anti-Kickback …

  • articleNov 7, 2013 | 2 min. read

    FLR and PQRS: How Are They Different?

    Functional limitation reporting (FLR) and PQRS both fall under the ever-widening umbrella of Medicare regulations, and they both involve outcome measures and data codes. Still, they are completely separate requirements, each with its own set of rules. Confusing, we know. To help you sort out the differences, we’ve put together a short breakdown of each one as well as a detailed compare/contrast chart: The Basics of FLR On July 1, 2013, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services …

  • Final Rule 2015: Here’s What You Need to Know Image

    articleNov 6, 2014 | 3 min. read

    Final Rule 2015: Here’s What You Need to Know

    The summary of this year’s Final Rule is hot off the presses, which means that—among other things—we now know the details regarding PQRS 2015. For those who have been following the PQRS saga since the program first came into being in 2007, it should come as no surprise that Medicare has yet again upped the ante for compliance. Based on the fact sheet CMS provided , here’s the scoop on this year’s reporting requirements: Eligible professionals who …

  • The Bundle Conundrum: Should PTs Participate in CJR? Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 6 min. read

    The Bundle Conundrum: Should PTs Participate in CJR?

    There a lot of hot topics in health care right now. Among top trending terms like “Affordable Care Act, ” “pay-for-performance, ” and “value-based care, ” you’ve also probably heard “Medicare bundled payments”—specifically, “CJR” (or Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement ). It’s a new bundled payment model from CMS, and it is of particular importance to outpatient rehab providers. As this article explains, “CJR will support better care for patients who are undergoing elective hip and knee …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.