French poetry and comic-book lore have taught us that “with great power comes great responsibility.” And with the imminent rollout of of new CPT codes for therapy evaluations and re-evaluations, rehab therapists would be wise to take that message to heart. That’s because, on January 1, 2017, PTs and OTs will have even more power in the way of accurately representing the patients they treat and the services they provide. Case in point: they’ll scrap all four existing evaluative codes—97001, 97002, 97003, and 97004—and adopt a set of new eight codes. And with this change, PTs and OTs also must determine—and code for—the correct level of complexity associated with each patient evaluation.

Now, it would be easy to bug out over this news, particularly as the holidays draw closer. But, as a PT or OT, you already know how to play detective during the patient’s initial evaluation. After all, you have to account for the whole picture—including any concurrent or past conditions that may impact the patient’s plan of care—in order to determine the best possible route of treatment. But with the adoption of these new evaluative codes, now it’s about applying that decision-making prowess in another way: to select the most accurate level of complexity for each evaluative episode. To that end, here are two examples that illustrate how to accurately code for the correct level of evaluation complexity. (If you haven’t already done so, I highly recommend reading this blog post before you dig into these examples, as it will provide context around the defining characteristics of each level of complexity.)

The PT Patient’s Guide to Understanding Insurance - Regular BannerThe PT Patient’s Guide to Understanding Insurance - Small Banner

Determining the Right Level of Code Complexity

Patient Example 1

During the past two weeks, Steven has experienced some lower back pain, causing him occasional discomfort. But his condition has steadily worsened: within the past few days, the 53-year-old has been unable to go on his daily two-mile jog, as the lower back pain began spreading to the top and sole of his right foot. Unfortunately, Steven’s pain level—he rates it as a “six” on a ten-point scale—from the combined pain points has caused him to wake up between three and four times per night; it’s also caused him to feel restless each morning before heading to work. After performing several tests on Steven’s lower back and extremities, you conclude that he has decreased sensation to light touch and pin-pricking on the top and bottom of his right foot. With a 44% Oswestry score, Steven cannot sit or stand for more than 30 minutes at a time, nor can he lift any heavy weights.

Based on your evaluation of Steven, which level of evaluative complexity should you—the PT—select? The table below spells out all the details. 

Duration

You spend a half hour face-to-face with Steven and/or his family.

History

Steven has a history of low back pain, but there are no personal factors or comorbidities that would impact his plan of care. (For an explanation of what constitutes a “personal factor,” check out this blog post.) This means the pain in Steven’s lower back likely resulted from one injury or accident—not from an underlying health issue.

Examination

You complete an examination of the areas in which Steven is experiencing pain—in this case, his lower back and extremities—using standardized tests and measures that address:

  • One body structure (e.g., lumbar vertebral column)
  • Two body functions (e.g., muscle power and sensation and pain)
  • One activity limitation (e.g., mobility: walking, carrying, and sleeping)

(To learn more about the terms listed above, refer to the Vocabulary section of this blog post.)

Clinical Presentation

The clinical presentation is stable and/or uncomplicated.

Decision-Making

In your evaluation of Steven, you exercise clinical decision-making of low complexity using standardized patient assessment instruments and/or measurable assessments of Steven’s functional outcomes.

Correct Code: 97161 (Low-Complexity PT Evaluation)

Even though Steven has a history of low back pain, he doesn’t present with any personal factors or comorbidities that would impact his plan of care. Through your assessment, you also conclude that Steven’s condition doesn’t vastly restrict his everyday performance and activity levels. With these factors in mind, you conclude—at least at this stage—that it makes sense to code for low complexity.

Patient Example 2

Rhonda, who had a stroke nine weeks ago, spent 12 days in an inpatient rehab facility before receiving treatment for the past five weeks in a skilled nursing facility. The 82-year-old, who is now under your care, lost her husband five months ago and is having a hard time coping; she previously was going to a support group, but now is unable to attend. Nowadays, Rhonda is staying with her 53-year-old daughter, who provides routine care and assistance. Rhonda, who’s legally blind and has type 1 insulin-dependent diabetes, had a knee replacement a year ago and is presenting with short-term memory deficits as well as decreased ability to complete tasks. She’s also presenting with muscle weakness, a hemiplegic gait pattern, and proprioceptive deficits on her right side. Due to increased physical and cognitive deficits, Rhonda can no longer perform household chores like vacuuming, dusting, and doing laundry. These restrictions have forced you, the OT, to provide assistance and modify some of her evaluation activities during visitation.

Based on your evaluation of Rhonda, which level of evaluative complexity should you—the OT—select? The table below breaks it all down . 

Duration

You spend 45 minutes face-to-face with Rhonda and/or her family.

History

To establish Rhonda’s plan of care, you conduct an expanded review of her medical and/or therapy records. Through that review, you find that she recently received care at an inpatient rehab facility, a skilled nursing facility, a psychologist’s office, and a social work office. Additionally, as noted above, Rhonda is legally blind and has decreased mobility—both of which result in a limited current functional performance.

Examination

You complete an examination of the areas in which Rhonda is experiencing pain using standardized tests and measures that address:

  • Seven performance deficits (e.g., dressing, bathing, toileting, walking, getting in and out of bed, getting transferred from one location to another, and performing everyday activities.)

Decision-Making

In your evaluation of Rhonda, you exercise clinical decision-making of a moderate complexity using standardized patient assessment instruments and/or measurable assessments of Rhonda’s functional outcomes.

Correct Code: 97166 (Moderate-Complexity OT Evaluation)

Because Rhonda has such an extended history of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial issues that relate to—and impact—her current functional performance, you must conduct an expanded review of her records (i.e., one that is much more intensive than a patient with a brief medical history). Furthermore, after completing Rhonda’s OT assessment, you conclude she has seven performance-related deficits that hinder her ability to complete everyday activities and household tasks. However, even though the number of performance deficits exceeds the number included in the code description for a moderate-complexity evaluation, Rhonda’s case—as a whole—is not complex enough to warrant a high-complexity evaluation (remember, when there are elements of different levels of complexity in any given evaluation, you typically should code down). Thus, it makes sense to code for moderate complexity.


The holidays are fast approaching—and adding another level of complexity (pun intended) to therapists’ coding and billing game will no-doubt put some PTs’ and OTs’ tinsel in a tussle. But while the benefits of “great power” and “great responsibility” may not be immediately apparent, the long-term payoff is that therapists will eventually be able to create clearer snapshots of the patients they treat and the care they provide—which could have a positive effect on future reimbursement rates.

Finally, keep in mind that the examples above are just that—examples. Like snowflakes, no two patients are exactly alike—and there’s no one-size-fits-all template for selecting the correct level of complexity for any given evaluation. It’s up to you, as a PT or OT, to wield your clinical judgment and expertise to figure out which complexity category each patient falls into—which means you must be diligent about collecting as much relevant information as possible to help inform that decision. For a more in-depth explanation of how to apply the complexity criteria to every patient you see, be sure to register for our next live—and totally free—webinar, “New Year, New Codes,” which takes place on Thursday, December 15, 2016. During this 90-minute presentation, WebPT’s own Heidi Jannenga will team up with compliance guru Rick Gawenda to offer a comprehensive overview of the new CPT codes and how to use them appropriately.

Download your evaluation complexity quick guide.

Enter your email address below, and we’ll send you a super-simple chart to help you decide which level of complexity—and thus, which CPT code—is appropriate for any given patient evaluation.

Please enable JavaScript to submit form.

  • The PT's Guide to Billing Image

    downloadJun 7, 2016

    The PT's Guide to Billing

    When it comes to physical therapy billing, you have to know your stuff—because even the simplest mistakes can cause denials. Of course, knowing billing backwards and forwards doesn’t have to be complicated. That’s why we created a comprehensive billing resource specifically for PTs. Take the guesswork out of billing. Enter your email address below, and we’ll send your free guide.

  • The 7 Deadly Sins of PT Billing Image

    webinarMar 30, 2015

    The 7 Deadly Sins of PT Billing

    Billing for physical therapy services is tricky, time-consuming, and riddled with ever-evolving rules—which means mistakes are bound to happen. But how many mistakes are you truly making? The occasional oops is one thing, but what if you’re unknowingly flubbing up left and right? That’s a scary thought. Even scarier: you could be flubbing on purpose, because “everyone’s doing it.” Whether accidental or intentional, actions have consequences, and when it comes to billing for the services you provide, …

  • Why Physical Therapists Should Support the CONNECT for Health Act 2017 Image

    articleAug 14, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Why Physical Therapists Should Support the CONNECT for Health Act 2017

    The US Senate recently introduced the Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act 2017 (S.1016) . If passed, the CONNECT for Health Act would remove several barriers to utilizing telehealth with Medicare patients—which would present a valuable opportunity to the physical therapy profession. Here’s why PTs should strongly consider supporting it: It will allow PTs to deliver, and receive reimbursement for, physical therapy telehealth services. As it stands, Medicare only provides …

  • Common Questions from Our Patient Sticker Shock Webinar Image

    articleMar 31, 2017 | 33 min. read

    Common Questions from Our Patient Sticker Shock Webinar

    From copays and deductibles to payer contracts and benefits verification, understanding all the nuances of third-party insurances is tough enough for healthcare providers—let alone their patients. In WebPT’s most recent webinar— Suppressing Sticker Shock: How to Handle Your Patients’ High-Deductible Health Plans —co-hosts Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, the cofounder and president of WebPT, and WebPT CEO Nancy Ham provided a lot of great advice on how to have productive conversations about healthcare costs with your patients—without …

  • Why PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Get a Seat on the Telehealth Train Image

    articleJan 9, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Why PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Get a Seat on the Telehealth Train

    Technology continues to play a key role in furthering health care’s reach—and remote, virtual care delivery is the latest trend in the overarching push to improve patients’ access to care. In fact, as we’ve previously reported , an estimated 1.8 million health consumers are expected to take part in some form of telehealth —or telemedicine—by year’s end, with the biggest market share coming from post-acute care patients. That’s great news for patients looking for alternate ways to …

  • Evidence-Based Payment: Why Data is the Key to Pay-for-Performance Success Image

    articleMay 5, 2015 | 4 min. read

    Evidence-Based Payment: Why Data is the Key to Pay-for-Performance Success

    If I challenged you to find a rehab therapist who didn’t believe in the power of evidence, you’d be searching for a while—forever, hopefully. After all, PTs, OTs, and SLPs are steadfastly dedicated to evidence-based clinical practice, because they know it gives their patients the best possible chances for success. On the business side of therapy practice, however, the application of evidence—a.k.a. data—is something many rehab therapists have yet to fully embrace. Payers, on the other hand, …

  • New Year, New Codes: How to Bill for PT and OT Evaluations in 2017 Image

    webinarOct 27, 2016

    New Year, New Codes: How to Bill for PT and OT Evaluations in 2017

    As we prepare to ring in the new year, PTs and OTs also must prepare to ring in a new set of CPT codes for therapy evaluations and re-evaluations. That’s right—the ball isn’t the only thing dropping on January 1, 2017. On that day, all of the existing PT and OT evaluative codes—including 97001, 97002, 97003, and 97004—are fading into the annals of history. In their place will be eight new codes: three for PT evals, three …

  • Denial Management FAQ Image

    articleMay 26, 2017 | 22 min. read

    Denial Management FAQ

    During our denial management webinar , we discussed the difference between rejections and denials, explained how to handle both, and provided a five-step plan for stopping them in their tracks. The webinar concluded with an exhaustive Q&A, and we’ve amassed the most common questions here. Insurance Issues Claim Quandaries Compliance Qualms Documentation Dilemmas Front-Office Frustrations Insurance Issues We’ve had issues with auto insurances denying 97112 (neuromuscular re-education) for non-neuro diagnoses, even in cases when the patient’s medical …

  • Founder Letter: Innovate, Don't Automate: The Slippery Slope of Clinical Support Software Image

    articleMar 7, 2017 | 8 min. read

    Founder Letter: Innovate, Don't Automate: The Slippery Slope of Clinical Support Software

    Today, most of us depend on technology to help us tackle some of the more mundane tasks that would otherwise require time and space on our already-too-full schedules. We text instead of call. We order gifts, groceries, and gadgets online instead of waiting in line at the store. And we deposit checks using our phones—if we ever even receive a check (hello, Square Cash and online bill pay)—instead of trekking over to the bank. In essence, we’ve …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.