Here’s how data collection will influence your future payments—probably a lot more than you think.
November is finally here, which means we here at WebPT can’t stop thinking about a juicy, flavorful, hot-out-of-the oven—Medicare Final Rule. While your tastebuds probably aren’t jumping with joy over the thought of chewing over a bunch of regulatory gobbledygook, the good news is that this year’s final rule shouldn’t be too tough to swallow (and if it is, you can always add more gravy). We’ve already picked out the most important pieces and served ’em up smorgasbord-style below. Here’s what’s on Medicare’s menu for 2016:
The PQRS Primer
What’s Staying the Same
In the grand scheme of things, the 2016 PQRS requirements for satisfactory reporting aren’t much different from the 2015 requirements—at least not as far as PTs, OTs, and SLPs are concerned. Here’s what’s staying the same this time around:
- The penalty for failing to meet the criteria for satisfactory reporting in 2016 is a 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018.
- Each eligible professional (EP) must report on nine measures across three NQS domains for at least 50% of Medicare Part B FFS patients.
- If fewer than nine measures apply to the EP, he or she must report on all applicable measures available for at least 50% of Medicare Part B FFS patients. If this is the case, the EP will be subject to Medicare’s Measures Applicability Validation (MAV) process, which allows Medicare to determine whether the EP should have reported on additional measures.
- An EP who sees at least one Medicare patient in a billed visit during 2016 must report on at least one cross-cutting measure, even if fewer than nine measures apply to the EP.
- CMS will not count any measures with a 0% performance rate.
- The reporting requirements also will remain the same for EPs who choose to report via the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO), with one minor exception, which we’ve noted in the section below. To review the reporting requirements for GPRO, check out this blog post.
What’s Changing in 2016
Of course, a new final rule wouldn’t be “new” without a few updates. Here are some of the changes for this year:
- There’s a total of 281 PQRS measures for 2016, up from 225 in 2015.
- Measure 173 (screening for unhealthy alcohol use), which was available to OTs in 2015, is being replaced by the new measure 431 (unhealthy alcohol use: screening and brief counseling). Note: This measure is registry-based only.
- Measures 154 (falls: risk assessment), 155 (falls: plan of care), and 431 have been added to the list of cross-cutting measures.
- Measure 131 (pain assessment and follow-up) will move from the Community, Population and Public Health NQS domain to the Communication and Care Coordination NQS domain. Additionally, this measure will apply to SLP.
- The MAV process for GPRO participants now will include a review of cross-cutting measure applicability.
What the Future Holds
As noted above, failure to satisfactorily report PQRS measures in 2016 will result in a 2% downward payment adjustment in 2018. In previous years—including 2015—the language in the Final Rule indicated that this penalty would remain the same for all subsequent reporting years. However, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) indicates that this adjustment will be in effect through 2018—thus indicating that the 2018 payment adjustment will be the last adjustment issued under the PQRS program. Essentially, this language authorizes the end of PQRS payment adjustments in 2018. If that is indeed the case, this year (2016) would be the final reporting year for PQRS.
The Vanishing Value-Based Modifier
Rehab therapists still are not eligible to participate in the Value-Based Payment Modifier (VM) program, which allows for differential Medicare payments based on quality and cost of care provided. In other words, based on their performance with various quality and cost measures, eligible professionals can receive either payment increases or decreases.
However, per MACRA, the VM program will expire at the end of 2018, with a new comprehensive program—known as the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)—going into effect in 2019 (with reporting beginning in 2017).
The Migration to MIPS
Introduced as part of MACRA, MIPS applies to payments for items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2019 (with those payments being determined by reporting data submitted/collected in 2017). However, for services provided in 2019 and 2020 (and thus, for data collected in 2017 and 2018), MIPS only applies to:
The end of the year is upon us; time to ready our poppers, streamers, and sparkly hats for the ol’ ball drop. As we brace ourselves for another rousing rendition of Auld Lang Syne, it’s hard not to reflect on the year—clichéd as it may sound. Another cliché: End-of-year lists. But we love them nonetheless; that’s why I amassed the WebPT Blog’s top ten posts of 2014. Overarching themes?
PQRS regulations change every year, which makes it tough to stay on top of the requirements. That’s why I’ve organized the most common questions regarding PQRS 2015 and posted them here. Have additional questions? Share them in the comments section, and I’ll post a second Q&A post at the end of the month following our PQRS webinar.
Last week, we covered the registry-and claims-based reporting methods for PQRS. In this post, I’ll discuss the complexities associated with reporting PQRS using the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO). In past years, GPRO seemed to be the most practical option for practices with more than two eligible professionals.
PQRS 2015 is upon us; here’s why PTs, OTs, and SLPs should select registry-based reporting over claims-based.
The summary of this year’s Final Rule is hot off the presses, which means that—among other things—we now know the details regarding PQRS 2015. For those who have been following the PQRS saga since the program first came into being in 2007, it should come as no surprise that Medicare has yet again upped the ante for compliance. Based on the fact sheet CMS provided, here’s the scoop on this year’s reporting requirements: