Want to learn about the hottest issues in the PT industry? Here are five more top takeaways from the 2015 Graham Sessions.
The end of the year is upon us; time to ready our poppers, streamers, and sparkly hats for the ol’ ball drop. As we brace ourselves for another rousing rendition of Auld Lang Syne, it’s hard not to reflect on the year—clichéd as it may sound. Another cliché: End-of-year lists. But we love them nonetheless; that’s why I amassed the WebPT Blog’s top ten posts of 2014. Overarching themes?
Last week, we covered the registry-and claims-based reporting methods for PQRS. In this post, I’ll discuss the complexities associated with reporting PQRS using the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO). In past years, GPRO seemed to be the most practical option for practices with more than two eligible professionals.
Once I pick my measures within WebPT, am I stuck with those throughout the year or can I change them? Yes, whichever measures you select will be your measures for the remainder of the year. You have until March 31, 2014, to make your final selection.
On Friday, Medicare released the 2014 specifications for individual PQRS measures. Not much has changed compared to last year; however, there are a few noteworthy differences, which we’ve detailed below. (Please note that there weren’t any major changes for speech language pathologists.)
Well, it’s November already, and that means two things: Thanksgiving and Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Sure, PQRS doesn’t involve mouthwatering roasted turkey, savory stuffing, or creamy mashed potatoes, but it has become quite the November tradition for us here at WebPT. You see, this is the time of year that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) typically confirms the details of next year’s reporting requirements, thus allowing us to update our PQRS solution (claims- and registry-based reporting) and start our month-long blog and webinar theme of “everything you need to know to be PQRS compliant.”
Unfortunately, this year is shaping up a little differently. As a result of the government shutdown, CMS delayed its November 1 meeting to discuss the 2014 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule—which includes potential PQRS changes—until at least the middle of this month. And until they meet, we won’t know much about what PQRS 2014 will truly entail in terms of reporting requirements, measures, penalties, and incentives—let alone when the government will actually finalize the Proposed Rule. This means that as of today, no one knows for sure:
- which measures therapists must report
- how many measures therapists must report
- whether there will be compliance incentives
- what penalties will be associated with noncompliance
- what percentage of patients for whom therapists must complete PQRS reporting
Last month, WebPT hosted another fantastic functional limitation reporting (FLR) webinar. If you missed it or simply want a refresher, this post is for you. Here were the most frequently asked questions and answers:
Today’s blog post comes from WebPT Senior Writer Charlotte Bohnett, contributing writer Erica Cohen, and WebPT Co-Founder Heidi Jannenga, PT. Monday and Tuesday we hosted webinars on functional limitation reporting. We got tons of great questions. Here are the most frequently asked ones:
With July 1 right around the corner, we know what’s on your mind: functional limitation reporting (FLR). That’s why we’ve dedicated (almost) this entire month to the ins and outs of G-codes and severity modifiers. But perhaps our discussions have been a little too theoretical for your liking. (We know FLR is one spicy meatball.) If that’s the case, don’t fret. Here’s a more concrete patient example to help solidify your understanding of CMS’s latest regulation. First, some handy dandy references for said example.