Lately, there’s been a bit of confusion surrounding Medicare’s requirements for submitting functional limitation reporting (FLR) discharge codes. Due to a “glitch” in the way Medicare processes claims containing FLR data, some therapists have received claim denials for cases involving tricky discharge reporting scenarios. So, we’ve put together a guide to address some common head-scratching situations. Read on to learn when you need to discharge and when you don’t.

Patient Self-Discharges and Returns After 60 or More Days

If a patient unexpectedly discontinues therapy, Medicare will automatically discharge the therapy reporting episode 60 days after the last recorded date of service. At that point, the patient has a clean slate as far as FLR goes. If the patient returns to therapy, there is no need to report discharge FLR data for the patient’s original primary functional limitation. Simply perform an initial examination and begin reporting FLR as if you were treating a new patient.

Patient Self-Discharges and Returns Within 60 Days to Treat the Same Functional Limitation

If a patient self-discharges and returns within 60 to receive treatment for the same functional limitation for which they previously received treatment, there is no need to complete a discharge note or submit discharge codes. Simply resume treating, documenting, and reporting FLR data as normal.

Patient Self-Discharges and Returns Within 60 Days to Treat a Different Functional Limitation

According to the APTA, if a patient self-discharges and returns to therapy within 60 days to receive treatment for a different functional limitation, you must discharge the original functional limitation during the patient’s first visit back to therapy. If you use WebPT, you will still assess and document the patient’s new functional limitation during that patient’s initial examination, even though the only FLR data you'll actually submit for that visit is the discharge data for the patient’s original functional limitation. Then, you’ll begin reporting FLR data on the patient’s new functional limitation during the patient’s next date of service (his or her second visit back to therapy).

Patient is Receiving Treatment for Two Different Cases From Two Different Therapists in the Same Clinic

If a patient seeks treatment for two different diagnoses (and two different functional limitations) from two different therapists within the same clinic, the two therapists must determine which of the two cases represents the patient’s true primary functional limitation. Based on that decision, one therapist will then discharge his or her primary functional limitation and the other will take “ownership” of FLR for that particular patient. However, the two therapists must collaborate and make sure their respective therapy goals align even though one therapist isn’t reporting FLR. For example, if the reporting therapist is treating for mobility and the non-reporting therapist is treating for self-care, the non-reporting therapist must weave elements of mobility treatment into his or her plan of care for the patient.

If, at the outset of treatment, both therapists agree on a single primary functional limitation (e.g., self care), one therapist will report all three sets of G-codes and severity modifiers (e.g., current status, projected goal status, and discharge status) at initial evaluation. Then, that therapist will continue to treat as normal without reporting any FLR data.

 

Have you received any claim denials related to discharge code reporting? What happened? Share your thoughts and questions in the comments section below.

Regulatory Roundup: 6 Challenges Confronting Rehab Therapists in 2018 - Regular BannerRegulatory Roundup: 6 Challenges Confronting Rehab Therapists in 2018 - Small Banner
  • articleFeb 5, 2013 | 3 min. read

    Embracing Functional Limitation Reporting

    Today's blog post comes from WebPT Co-Founder Heidi Jannenga, PT, MPT, ATC/L. By now, I’m sure you’ve heard about functional limitation reporting—also known as claims-based outcome reporting (CBOR) and G-code reporting. Regardless of what your clinic calls it, functional limitation reporting is coming quickly. In fact, as of July 1, 2013, CMS is making it mandatory. That means they won’t pay you for your services if you don’t properly report functional limitations via specific G-codes on the …

  • The Ultimate Functional Limitation Reporting Survival Guide Image

    articleJul 1, 2013 | 3 min. read

    The Ultimate Functional Limitation Reporting Survival Guide

    Oops! You had your head in the proverbial sand regarding all of this functional limitation reporting mumbo jumbo, and now you need a crash-course—stat! Luckily for you, we’ve put together a quick study guide to help you cram for the big change. Think of it as your FLR CliffsNotes—a condensed summary of this new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requirement and what you need to do to stay compliant. So, let’s get to it. Here …

  • articleJan 3, 2013 | 2 min. read

    Now That I Know G-Codes Ain’t No Thang, How Do I Implement ‘Em?

    Last month, we discussed CMS’s new G-codes in a cleverly titled post, “ Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. ” As the name implies, this new functional limitation reporting mandate is not nearly as daunting as you may think. In fact, if you use WebPT, it’s going to be as easy as pie—cherry pie, or maybe apple. Regardless, I digress. Here, we’ll discuss how with just a few clicks, and some clinical judgment, you can easily implement …

  • articleMay 23, 2013 | 4 min. read

    Gaming the System and Other FLR No-Nos

    We all know that functional limitation reporting (FLR)  means (a little) more work for (basically) the same reward. And that can be a hard pill to swallow for many therapists who are already stretched thin as a result of increasing caseloads and increasingly stringent documentation requirements. Even so, taking the easy road—the low road—and gaming the system—and thus, this profession—is not the answer. It never is. This—just like everything else you do for your patients, your practice, …

  • articleNov 7, 2013 | 2 min. read

    FLR and PQRS: How Are They Different?

    Functional limitation reporting (FLR) and PQRS both fall under the ever-widening umbrella of Medicare regulations, and they both involve outcome measures and data codes. Still, they are completely separate requirements, each with its own set of rules. Confusing, we know. To help you sort out the differences, we’ve put together a short breakdown of each one as well as a detailed compare/contrast chart: The Basics of FLR On July 1, 2013, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services …

  • articleMar 11, 2013 | 17 min. read

    February Medicare Webinar Q&A

    Last month’s webinar on Medicare was our most highly attended webinar to date. And that’s really not surprising, because wherever Medicare goes, questions follow. But unfortunately, we couldn’t get to them all live. So we thought we’d put together a blog post will all the great questions you asked and our answers. That way, you can access it wherever, whenever you want. Ready to jump in? Here’s your Medicare Q&A.    (P.S. Are you a first timer …

  • Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. What You Need to Know About the New G-Codes. Image

    articleAug 20, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. What You Need to Know About the New G-Codes.

    Like the ’90s hip-hop-themed title of this blog post implies, Functional Limitation Reporting G-codes may be new, but they’re nothing to fret over. Essentially, effective July 1, 2013, CMS began requiring therapists to report new G-codes in an effort to further emphasize function and functional progress in therapy treatment. But the good news is that you should already be assessing—and documenting—functional progress as part of your short- and long-term goal setting at the initial evaluation, tenth visit …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1 Image

    articleJul 29, 2014 | 6 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1

    Today’s blog post comes from WebPT writers Brooke Andrus and Erica Cohen. If a patient has more than one functional limitation associated with a single diagnosis, should I report G-codes and severity modifiers for all of them? No. Medicare will only accept functional limitation reporting (FLR) data for one primary functional limitation per case. Therefore, if the patient has multiple functional limitations associated with a single diagnosis, you'll need to determine which one represents the patient's primary …

  • How to Complete Functional Limitation Reporting in WebPT Image

    articleFeb 19, 2014 | 4 min. read

    How to Complete Functional Limitation Reporting in WebPT

    As of July 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires that therapists complete functional limitation reporting (FLR)—through the use of  G-codes and severity modifiers —on all eligible Medicare Part B patients at the initial evaluation, re-evaluation if applicable, every progress note (minimum of every ten visits), and discharge in order to receive reimbursement for their services. Today, several other private insurance companies also require FLR data as a condition of reimbursement. Good thing …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.