Lately, there’s been a bit of confusion surrounding Medicare’s requirements for submitting functional limitation reporting (FLR) discharge codes. Due to a “glitch” in the way Medicare processes claims containing FLR data, some therapists have received claim denials for cases involving tricky discharge reporting scenarios. So, we’ve put together a guide to address some common head-scratching situations. Read on to learn when you need to discharge and when you don’t.

Patient Self-Discharges and Returns After 60 or More Days

If a patient unexpectedly discontinues therapy, Medicare will automatically discharge the therapy reporting episode 60 days after the last recorded date of service. At that point, the patient has a clean slate as far as FLR goes. If the patient returns to therapy, there is no need to report discharge FLR data for the patient’s original primary functional limitation. Simply perform an initial examination and begin reporting FLR as if you were treating a new patient.

Patient Self-Discharges and Returns Within 60 Days to Treat the Same Functional Limitation

If a patient self-discharges and returns within 60 to receive treatment for the same functional limitation for which they previously received treatment, there is no need to complete a discharge note or submit discharge codes. Simply resume treating, documenting, and reporting FLR data as normal.

Patient Self-Discharges and Returns Within 60 Days to Treat a Different Functional Limitation

According to the APTA, if a patient self-discharges and returns to therapy within 60 days to receive treatment for a different functional limitation, you must discharge the original functional limitation during the patient’s first visit back to therapy. If you use WebPT, you will still assess and document the patient’s new functional limitation during that patient’s initial examination, even though the only FLR data you'll actually submit for that visit is the discharge data for the patient’s original functional limitation. Then, you’ll begin reporting FLR data on the patient’s new functional limitation during the patient’s next date of service (his or her second visit back to therapy).

Patient is Receiving Treatment for Two Different Cases From Two Different Therapists in the Same Clinic

If a patient seeks treatment for two different diagnoses (and two different functional limitations) from two different therapists within the same clinic, the two therapists must determine which of the two cases represents the patient’s true primary functional limitation. Based on that decision, one therapist will then discharge his or her primary functional limitation and the other will take “ownership” of FLR for that particular patient. However, the two therapists must collaborate and make sure their respective therapy goals align even though one therapist isn’t reporting FLR. For example, if the reporting therapist is treating for mobility and the non-reporting therapist is treating for self-care, the non-reporting therapist must weave elements of mobility treatment into his or her plan of care for the patient.

If, at the outset of treatment, both therapists agree on a single primary functional limitation (e.g., self care), one therapist will report all three sets of G-codes and severity modifiers (e.g., current status, projected goal status, and discharge status) at initial evaluation. Then, that therapist will continue to treat as normal without reporting any FLR data.

 

Have you received any claim denials related to discharge code reporting? What happened? Share your thoughts and questions in the comments section below.

Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Regular BannerTriumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Small Banner
  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2 Image

    articleJul 30, 2014 | 4 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2

    I heard that some private insurance carriers are now requiring functional limitation reporting. Is this true? Some non-Medicare insurers do require functional limitation reporting (e.g., Texas Workers' Compensation). Check out this blog post to see a list of the ones we know about right now. Keep in mind, however, that this list is ever-changing—so if you’re unsure of whether a particular plan requires FLR, be sure to inquire directly with the carrier. If I did not submit …

  • articleMar 11, 2013 | 17 min. read

    February Medicare Webinar Q&A

    Last month’s webinar on Medicare was our most highly attended webinar to date. And that’s really not surprising, because wherever Medicare goes, questions follow. But unfortunately, we couldn’t get to them all live. So we thought we’d put together a blog post will all the great questions you asked and our answers. That way, you can access it wherever, whenever you want. Ready to jump in? Here’s your Medicare Q&A.    (P.S. Are you a first timer …

  • articleFeb 5, 2013 | 3 min. read

    Embracing Functional Limitation Reporting

    Today's blog post comes from WebPT Co-Founder Heidi Jannenga, PT, MPT, ATC/L. By now, I’m sure you’ve heard about functional limitation reporting—also known as claims-based outcome reporting (CBOR) and G-code reporting. Regardless of what your clinic calls it, functional limitation reporting is coming quickly. In fact, as of July 1, 2013, CMS is making it mandatory. That means they won’t pay you for your services if you don’t properly report functional limitations via specific G-codes on the …

  • Functional Limitation Reporting Refresher Image

    articleDec 12, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Functional Limitation Reporting Refresher

    The rehab therapy industry is abuzz with PQRS talk right now. In case you missed it: PQRS as it exists today is dunzo . In 2017, it’ll be replaced with the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System , or MIPS. Unfortunately, though—and yes, it is unfortunate —PTs, OTs, and SLPs are not required to complete MIPS reporting until 2019. (And the jury is still out as to whether they’ll be able to voluntarily participate before then.) All outpatient rehab …

  • articleJan 3, 2013 | 2 min. read

    Now That I Know G-Codes Ain’t No Thang, How Do I Implement ‘Em?

    Last month, we discussed CMS’s new G-codes in a cleverly titled post, “ Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. ” As the name implies, this new functional limitation reporting mandate is not nearly as daunting as you may think. In fact, if you use WebPT, it’s going to be as easy as pie—cherry pie, or maybe apple. Regardless, I digress. Here, we’ll discuss how with just a few clicks, and some clinical judgment, you can easily implement …

  • Back to Basics: Functional Limitation Reporting G-Codes Image

    articleFeb 11, 2013 | 7 min. read

    Back to Basics: Functional Limitation Reporting G-Codes

    We’ve covered the ins and outs of G-codes as well as how it easy it will be to implement them successfully within WebPT —and why an integrated functional limitation reporting solution is the best solution . Today let’s go back to the G-code basics. What’s a G-code? Effective July 1, 2013, CMS will require therapists to complete functional limitation reporting through the use of new G-codes and corresponding severity modifiers for all eligible Medicare patients at the …

  • Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. What You Need to Know About the New G-Codes. Image

    articleAug 20, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. What You Need to Know About the New G-Codes.

    Like the ’90s hip-hop-themed title of this blog post implies, Functional Limitation Reporting G-codes may be new, but they’re nothing to fret over. Essentially, effective July 1, 2013, CMS began requiring therapists to report new G-codes in an effort to further emphasize function and functional progress in therapy treatment. But the good news is that you should already be assessing—and documenting—functional progress as part of your short- and long-term goal setting at the initial evaluation, tenth visit …

  • webinarMay 21, 2013

    Get Ready for Functional Limitation Reporting

    Beginning July 1, 2013, CMS is requiring that you complete functional limitation reporting (FLR) on all Medicare patients in order to receive reimbursement for your services. We know you want to get paid. That’s why it’s crucial you have functional limitation reporting down pat. With that in mind, WebPT will host a special webinar on May 20 to help you get fully prepared for FLR. In this 60-minute session, hosts Heidi Jannenga and Mike Manheimer will explain …

  • articleNov 6, 2013 | 2 min. read

    Functional Limitation Reporting in a Nutshell

    Hopefully, you’ve been working your functional limitation reporting (FLR) magic for months now, so you’ve got it down pat. If not, you’re probably running into more than your fair share of claim denials. Don’t worry; we’re here to help. Here are some FLR basics in a convenient chestnut shell. (It is almost that time of the year , after all). What is FLR? Beginning July 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require that …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.