Insurance payments for healthcare services have been declining for a while now, which means providers in all disciplines are looking for ways to optimize their payer mix in order to maximize their revenue. If you haven’t yet calculated the cost of providing your services—and compared that number to the payments you’re receiving to ensure you’re actually making enough money to not only cover those costs, but also turn a profit—then you should. But the question remains: should practices go full-tilt cash-based, remain loyal to commercial and/or government payers, or accept a combination of all three? Here’s what WebPT learned from its most recent rehab therapy industry survey (you can download the full survey report  here) as well as some factors to consider when making your own payer mix decision:

Breaking Bad Habits: The Modern PT’s Formula for Success - Regular BannerBreaking Bad Habits: The Modern PT’s Formula for Success - Small Banner

Most organizations have a fairly even split between commercial and government payers.

As you can see below, the majority of organizations surveyed operate on a fairly even split between commercial insurance and government payers. A much smaller percentage of providers accept mostly commercial payers, a mix of cash and other payers, or mostly government payers. And few accept only cash or only commercial payers. In other words, most practices are still relying heavily on third-party payers.

Organizations By Payer Mix

There’s also a fairly even distribution of payer mixes across revenue segments—with two exceptions.

Now, as the report shows, when it comes to annual gross revenue, “there’s a fairly even distribution of payer mixes across all revenue segments”—until you get to the cash-only and commercial payer-only segments, which are “dominated by providers with a gross annual revenue of less than $100,000.”

Annual Gross Revenue By Payer Mix

Cash-based organizations are often run by single providers.

We’re not sure why this distribution exists in the commercial-payers-only segment—perhaps it’s simply due to this segment’s small sample size—but it does make sense in the cash-only group, because (as you’ll see in the graphs below), “cash-based entities account for 18.4% of single-provider organizations but do not represent more than 2.4% of any other provider segment.”

Payer Mix By Provider Segment

In other words, many cash-only practices are run by single providers—more than half of whom make less than $100,000 in annual gross revenue.

Annual Gross Revenue By Number of Providers

There’s no one-size-fits-all payer mix.

As you can see, there is not one “right” answer as to the best payer mix for a given practice, but there are some interesting trends. For example, it appears that compared to single-provider practices, larger practices are more likely to accept an even split between commercial third-party payers and government payers (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid). However, that is still the most popular payer mix type for practices of all sizes—although it’s not totally clear whether that arrangement is popular because that’s the way it’s always been done, or because it actually generates the most revenue. Single-provider practices were also more likely to operate using a hybrid payer model—that is, a mix of cash and other payers—than any other provider group surveyed. It will be interesting to see how these numbers change over the next few years as cash-based practice models become more popular—and hybrid models even more so. After all, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to rely exclusively on third-party payer reimbursements.

But, there are several factors to consider when making payer decisions.

As I discussed here, before deciding on a payer mix, providers should consider several factors, including how much risk they’re willing take as well as their geographic area, referral sources, and overhead costs—not to mention patient demographics. After all, some patients simply may not be comfortable paying for your services out of pocket, even if they receive reimbursement from their insurance company. And some referral sources may only be willing to pass on patients with a particular insurance.

Staying in-network with every payer may not be sustainable.

That being said, keeping an in-network relationship with every payer may not be a sustainable practice—especially if you’re not earning enough money to cover the cost of of a patient visit. After all, going out-of-network enables you to negotiate with the patient directly to establish a price point that works for both of you. That’s not an option you have available when you’re under contract with a payer. According to WebPT President Heidi Jannenga in this webinar, “some providers try to make up the cost difference [of a low-ball third-party payer rate] by either increasing the volume of patients they see or reducing total patient treatment time or care episodes, but none of those decisions are based on what’s best for patients; instead, those providers are making concessions to their treatment plans that essentially reduce the quality of the care they’re providing for all of their patients.” And that’s a slippery slope that could end up hurting your patients—and your practice’s reputation.

But, there are situations in which you may want to remain in-network—even if the fee schedule is less than ideal.

Every decision to drop a payer should be made with caution, because it could cause a drop in revenue—at least in the short term. While hanging on to a payer that requires you to cut corners on patient care is an all-around bad idea, WebPT CEO Nancy Ham believes there are some situations in which you may want to remain in-network with a particular payer, even if the fee schedule isn’t ideal—for example, when dropping that payer could:

  • “prevent some of your current patients from receiving the care they need,
  • “reduce the number of new patients you see, and
  • “cause problems with your top referrers.”

While optimizing your payer mix is crucial to the success of your practice, there are several other things you can do to boost revenue and ensure operational efficiency—thus improving your bottom line. For example, you could focus your energy on improving patient retention and implementing lean business principles. That way, if you need to keep a payer on for any one of the reasons Ham mentioned, you’ll still be in good financial shape.

How do you determine the right payer mix for your practice? What does your payer mix look like now—and are you pleased with it? Share your perspective in the comment section below.

  • Cashing In on Private Pay: The PT's Guide to Going Out-of-Network Image

    webinarJul 27, 2017

    Cashing In on Private Pay: The PT's Guide to Going Out-of-Network

    For many rehab therapists, submitting a claim to a third-party payer feels a lot like pulling the lever on a slot machine. You never know for sure what you’re gonna get—and most of the time, it’s less than you’d hoped for. With seemingly ever-increasing regulations—and constantly shrinking reimbursements—it’s no wonder so many PTs, OTs, and SLPs feel like the financial odds are stacked against them. [video://] As a result, more and more rehab therapy providers are trying …

  • Suppressing Sticker Shock: How to Handle Your Patients’ High-Deductible Health Plans Image

    webinarFeb 23, 2017

    Suppressing Sticker Shock: How to Handle Your Patients’ High-Deductible Health Plans

    Copayments, coinsurances, unresolved balances—oh my! Any one of these can cause headaches for healthcare providers, but as healthcare reform efforts shift more and more financial burden to insurance beneficiaries, today’s practitioners are increasingly facing all three. And these challenges are not only hurting their patient acquisition and retention rates, but also their bottom lines. Tired of spending time verifying benefits only to lose those patients to copay sticker shock? Stuck in a constant cycle of pursuing past-due …

  • Common Questions from Our Patient Sticker Shock Webinar Image

    articleMar 31, 2017 | 33 min. read

    Common Questions from Our Patient Sticker Shock Webinar

    From copays and deductibles to payer contracts and benefits verification, understanding all the nuances of third-party insurances is tough enough for healthcare providers—let alone their patients. In WebPT’s most recent webinar— Suppressing Sticker Shock: How to Handle Your Patients’ High-Deductible Health Plans —co-hosts Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, the cofounder and president of WebPT, and WebPT CEO Nancy Ham provided a lot of great advice on how to have productive conversations about healthcare costs with your patients—without …

  • Fee for All: How to Set a Rate Schedule for Your Rehab Therapy Practice Image

    articleMay 3, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Fee for All: How to Set a Rate Schedule for Your Rehab Therapy Practice

    I’m going to be frank here: setting the right fee schedule for your clinic is important—like, really, really important. Why is it such a big deal? The answer might seem obvious, but it’s actually a bit more nuanced. When new patients step into your office, you’re not just improving their day-to-day function—you’re showing them the value of their health and well-being. By seeking out movement-based therapy, patients are making an investment in their physical welfare. So, as …

  • Coding Faux Pas: 5 Common Rehab Therapy Billing Mistakes Image

    articleMay 9, 2017 | 7 min. read

    Coding Faux Pas: 5 Common Rehab Therapy Billing Mistakes

    As the old saying goes, “To err is human.” But when human error stands between you and timely reimbursements, it’s difficult to remain philosophical. From missing GP modifiers to miscalculated coding units, here are five common billing mistakes that keep rehab therapists from getting paid. 1. Omitted Modifiers Modifiers: Easily applied; even more easily overlooked. Therapy modifiers—including GP, GO, and GN—specify to the payer what kind of therapy service was provided (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapy). …

  • Down with Denials! 5 Claim Fixes to Make Sure Your PT Clinic Gets Paid Image

    webinarApr 19, 2017

    Down with Denials! 5 Claim Fixes to Make Sure Your PT Clinic Gets Paid

    One denied claim might not sound off your billing alarm bells—but in reality, it should. That’s because—as with faulty plumbing—one leak often indicates a much larger issue. And all too often, rehab therapy practices fail to act quickly enough—and soon find themselves wading in a flood of lost revenue. But there are simple, proven, and affordable ways to not only plug your billing holes, but also reinforce your whole system so you’re less likely to bust a …

  • How to Stay in Business in this Uncertain Healthcare Environment Image

    articleJun 29, 2017 | 17 min. read

    How to Stay in Business in this Uncertain Healthcare Environment

    Health care as we know it is changing. But that’s nothing new, right? Health care has been in a state of flux for a while now—what with ever-changing payer regulations and the steady push toward more patient-centric, value-based collaborative care. And while putting patients first is surely good for everyone, increasing regulations—and decreasing reimbursements—can make it challenging for providers to keep up, let alone keep the lights on. That’s why we’ve spent much of this quarter discussing …

  • PT Billing Tips from the Trenches Image

    articleMay 22, 2017 | 6 min. read

    PT Billing Tips from the Trenches

    It’s hard out here for a biller—between dodging denials, hunting past-due balances, and navigating the ever-changing compliance climate, keeping a rehab therapy practice’s billing processes in tip-top shape is no simple feat. The heat is definitely on when a good portion of your company’s cash flow falls squarely on your shoulders—but you don’t have to go it alone. In fact, we’ve rounded up several therapy billing gurus who were happy to lend their expertise and spill some …

  • Bad Debt Blues: How to Keep Your Clinic Out of the Red Image

    articleSep 21, 2018 | 5 min. read

    Bad Debt Blues: How to Keep Your Clinic Out of the Red

    Many practices are experiencing higher levels of bad debt than they have in the past—partially due to the proliferation of high-deductible health plans that place greater financial responsibility on patients. And when patients don't pay the full amount they are responsible for—and practices fail to collect past-due amounts—the go-to solution often is writing off those totals as bad debt. But financially, that is not an ideal course of action. So, let's talk about how to optimize your …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.