Improvement Standard

When I say “Medicare policy,” what’s the first word that comes to mind? Probably not “clear.” Unfortunately, that lack of clarity leaves Medicare rules super prone to misinterpretation and misapplication. Case in point: the so-called Medicare Improvement Standard.

To make a long story short, there have been some major developments regarding this quote-unquote “rule.” I’ll get into the nitty-gritty in a bit, but the meat of the story is that (a) most of what you think you know about this standard is probably false—or, at the very least, a little distorted—and (b) a federal judge recently slapped Medicare with a court-ordered directive to clarify its policy regarding patient improvement and launch a widespread educational campaign to ensure that going forward, all patients and providers interpret the policy correctly.

So, how did this issue make it all the way to federal court? Well, for years, both providers and Medicare beneficiaries have operated under the incorrect assumption that Medicare will only pay for rehab therapy or other skilled care if a patient shows improvement as a result of that care. In short, they believed that no progress meant no coverage—unless the patient’s condition deteriorated, in which case therapy could resume. Thus, even in cases where therapy would maintain a patient’s level of function by preventing a problem from worsening, therapists had to cease treatment until the problem actually got worse. Seems silly, right? More than silly, actually; for those unable to provide or receive therapy services due to this stipulation, it was downright maddening.

Not surprisingly, the issue eventually wound up in front of a federal judge as part of a class-action lawsuit, with the plaintiffs alleging that Medicare contractors were denying or approving claims based on an inaccurate improvement standard. On January 24, 2013, the US District Court for the District of Vermont approved a settlement agreement directing the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to clarify relevant portions of the existing Medicare Benefit Policy Manual—which actually do not require improvement as a condition of coverage—and roll out new educational materials aimed at correcting long-standing, widespread misconceptions about the Improvement Standard. CMS has until January 2014 to comply with this order.

Still, despite posting a two-page fact sheet about the case on their website in April, CMS has a ways to go when it comes to spreading the word about this important court decision. Many providers remain completely unaware of this case or the resulting settlement and continue to treat—or not treat—with the false belief that Medicare will not cover services if patients do not demonstrate improvement.

To help bring you up to speed, we’ve compiled the following list of important information regarding the settlement:

  • This ruling did not result in any new regulations, but rather a detailed clarification of existing standards. According to the written settlement: “Nothing in this Settlement Agreement modifies, contracts, or expands the existing eligibility requirements for receiving Medicare coverage...”
  • The settlement went into effect immediately for both Medicare proper and Medicare Advantage plans.
  • Medicare coverage for outpatient physical, occupational, and speech therapy services does not depend on a patient’s “potential for improvement from the therapy but rather on the beneficiary’s need for skilled care.” (Tweet this!)
  • Medicare covers skilled care—including therapy—that takes place in a patient’s home as long as the patient is homebound (although not necessarily confined to bed).
  • Medicare covers skilled therapy services—including home health services, outpatient therapy services, and services provided within a skilled nursing facility—if the services are “necessary to maintain the patient’s current condition or prevent or slow further deterioration.”
  • Medicare will reimburse therapists for “the establishment or design of a maintenance program,” “the instruction of the beneficiary or appropriate caregiver,” and the “necessary periodic reevaluations...of the beneficiary and maintenance program.”
  • Even if nursing home residents do not qualify for Medicare coverage of their stay in the facility, Medicare still may cover rehab therapy services for residents who meet the requirements for outpatient therapy. (Tweet this!)
  • The coverage standards clarified in this ruling do not apply to therapy services provided in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) or comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facilities (CORFs).
  • A special review process is in the works to reimburse patients whose claims Medicare denied due to lack of improvement after the lawsuit was filed on January 18, 2011.

Remember, the key to ensuring patients take full advantage of their Medicare benefits is making sure everyone clearly understands the policy for coverage. Now that you’re in the know, share this post with fellow therapists, patients, or anyone else who might be affected by the settlement.

WebPT + Billing Software - Regular BannerWebPT + Billing Software - Small Banner
  • Should Physical Therapists Enroll as Medicare Providers? Image

    articleJul 8, 2014 | 9 min. read

    Should Physical Therapists Enroll as Medicare Providers?

    If you’re starting—or have ever started—a private physical therapy practice, then you’ve almost certainly grappled with the decision of whether to accept Medicare patients. And unless your patient demographic absolutely demands that you do, I’m guessing it is—or was—a pretty tough call to make. I’ll be upfront: the title of this post is perhaps a bit misleading, because honestly, there is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question. As such, I can’t, in good conscience, definitively tell you …

  • Technical Diligence: The Key to Stopping Claim Denials Dead in their Tracks Image

    articleJul 9, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Technical Diligence: The Key to Stopping Claim Denials Dead in their Tracks

    Hello, readers. Over the past several weeks, I’ve enjoyed answering a number of your questions regarding billing for PT services, so I’m excited to address the topic right here on the WebPT Blog. On June 19, 2015, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report involving an outpatient private practice physical therapy provider. In case you weren’t aware, the OIG—which is part of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—is basically the CMS …

  • Denial Management FAQ Image

    articleMay 26, 2017 | 22 min. read

    Denial Management FAQ

    During our denial management webinar , we discussed the difference between rejections and denials, explained how to handle both, and provided a five-step plan for stopping them in their tracks. The webinar concluded with an exhaustive Q&A, and we’ve amassed the most common questions here. Insurance Issues Claim Quandaries Compliance Qualms Documentation Dilemmas Front-Office Frustrations Insurance Issues We’ve had issues with auto insurances denying 97112 (neuromuscular re-education) for non-neuro diagnoses, even in cases when the patient’s medical …

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. Questions related to: • WebPT • Modifier 59 • Other Modifiers • Coding • ICD-10 • …

  • A Tale of Two Billing Blunders: Overbilling and Misbilling Image

    articleJul 23, 2015 | 6 min. read

    A Tale of Two Billing Blunders: Overbilling and Misbilling

    Billing for physical therapy services is tricky, time-consuming, and nerve-wracking. After all, there are so many rules to follow, and it seems like those rules are constantly changing. That makes mistakes tough to avoid. And in many cases, you might not even know you’re making them. And while an occasional billing error probably isn’t a huge deal, if you’re unknowingly messing up left and right, you could end up in hot water. And if you’re purposely messing …

  • Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On Image

    articleDec 6, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On

    If there’s one thing I know about rehab therapists, it’s that we are all very busy people. If your to-do list is anything like mine, it’s growing faster than you can prune it—and has probably expanded onto multiple sheets of paper (or maybe even into multiple notebooks). And regardless of the value associated with each item on the docket, we tend to refer to these tasks as things we “have” to do—not things we “get” to do. …

  • Why You Must Code for Medical Necessity with ICD-10 Image

    articleApr 8, 2014 | 3 min. read

    Why You Must Code for Medical Necessity with ICD-10

    In order to successfully transition to ICD-10, healthcare providers will need to change more than the actual codes they use; they’ll also have to change the way they think about coding. Because in addition to choosing the right code from a list of 68,000 possibilities, providers must ensure that the code they choose most accurately reflects the specific condition they’re treating so it supports the medical necessity of their services. As this article points out, “Medical necessity …

  • Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Halloween may be over, but if you didn’t get your fill of scares, I’ve got the perfect activity for you: reading through 1,401 pages of pure Medicare gobbledygook. Screaming yet? (Or should I check back at around page 500?) I kid, of course; there’s no need for you to slog through this year’s extra meaty Final Rule —which details the Medicare fee schedule and other important Medicare regulatory and reimbursement changes for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and …

  • Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments Image

    articleMay 4, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Odd Provider Out: Why PT Exclusion from MIPS is Bad for Future Payments

    It’s official: rehab therapists are just a sashay away from exiting the PQRS dance floor. That’s because last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed final rule that, if adopted, will put into effect the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). And that, in turn, will give the green light to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) , a brand spankin’-new quality data reporting program that consolidates PQRS , …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.