The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) is a program designed by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to improve the quality of reporting in the healthcare industry. The program is now considered to be permanent and therefore the program name has been amended to the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). PQRS reporting is based on individual measures which are associated to a specific patient group by diagnosis, ailment, age, or clinical action taken by the reporting therapist. All Medicare Part B FFS (fee for service) patients are eligible, but must meet inclusion criteria for each measure.

There are 2 methods of reporting your clinical data to CMS:  Claims-based and Registry.  Choosing your reporting method is very important in reaching your 1% incentive goal.  What is the difference between the 2 methods?  What are the Pros and Cons of each?  Let’s explore:

Claims-based Reporting
With claims-based reporting, measures are tied to clinical practice reported on claims with CPT codes that link to measures. Data submission is the responsibility of the eligible professional or group practice themselves or your billing company may offer this service for an extra fee.

To qualify for your 0.5% incentive, you must report on at least 3 measures and report on 50% of eligible patients (this is a reduction from the 80% requirement of 2010).

Advantages of claims-based reporting

  1. You are in control of your own data from completion to submission
  2. Self auditing process developed to your clinic’s specific needs
  3. Cheaper – no added cost
  4. Only 50% reporting requirement
  5. OK for smaller practice or if Medicare is a small portion of your payer mix

Disadvantages of claims-based reporting:

  1. Must have someone in the clinic who will own this project: complete audits, know all the ins/outs of PQRS, keep record of the % completed
  2. Auditing process can be tedious and potentially a productivity loss for an employee
  3. You must complete and submit the proper forms in proper format for the eligible patients
  4. Workload could be significant if large % of your patients are Medicare or part of a large clinic
  5. No internal automated check/balance system completed by the billing company: submits only what you give them

Registry-based Reporting
With registry-based reporting, the eligible professional or group practice submits the data electronically to the registry, who then captures and stores the measure related data. The registry is then responsible for submitting the individual measure or measures group information to CMS on behalf of eligible professionals.  Registries provide CMS with calculated reporting and performance rates at the end of the reporting period.  Registries must pass stringent reporting method criteria annually and be qualified to participate. WebPT is one of only two certified EMR registries available in the PT industry.

Check out the most current list of Qualified Registries for 2010 PQRI Reporting is available at the CMS website. (The 2011 list has not been updated on the CMS website yet).

To qualify for your 0.5% incentive, you must report on at least 3 measures and report on 80% of eligible patients.

Advantages of registry-based reporting:

  1. Form creation and submission is done for you
  2. No need for auditing due to the EMR enforcing measure criteria and selecting eligible patients
  3. Staff productivity maintained
  4. Higher potential for meeting the reporting criteria and receiving your 0.5% incentive bonus
  5. Using a PT specific EMR registry gives you added insight and assistance with choosing most appropriate measures
  6. Measures are updated automatically each year as information is provided by CMS.

Disadvantages of registry-based reporting: 

  1. There is a cost involved; but if using WebPT it is nominal and definitely provides an ROI when staff time, paper/office supplies, and decreased stress levels are calculated
  2. 80% reporting requirement, but with the EMR in place, 100% data collection should be the expectation.
  3. Data collection enforcement with all eligible patients – no choice but to report on each patient

The 1% incentive may not seem like much of a bonus if you have to spend staff time and effort to get the proper codes into billing, complete audits to ensure your clinic is meeting its minimum criteria, and manually submitting claims to CMS. Although there is a cost associated with using a registry, the savings on staff time and maintaining productivity alone will be worth it.  

It also makes sense to choose a PT specific registry, like WebPT, which gives you the tools and outlines the measures in a way that streamlines to your workflow.  To me, registry reporting just makes more sense – leave the technical automated reporting method to the experts and let me use my clinical expertise to provide valuable feedback on how PTs impact patients’ lives daily.

Cloudy with a Chance of Reform: 5 Key Healthcare Forecasts for 2017 - Regular BannerCloudy with a Chance of Reform: 5 Key Healthcare Forecasts for 2017 - Small Banner
  • GPRO 2015: Is it Worth it? Image

    articleNov 19, 2014 | 4 min. read

    GPRO 2015: Is it Worth it?

    Last week, we covered the registry-and claims-based reporting methods for PQRS. In this post, I’ll discuss the complexities associated with reporting PQRS using the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO). In past years, GPRO seemed to be the most practical option for practices with more than two eligible professionals. This year, however, Medicare added more stipulations to the GPRO program—and in some cases, those add-ons might make the whole thing more trouble than it’s worth. The Basics of …

  • Registry-Based vs. Claims-Based vs. GPRO Image

    articleNov 24, 2015 | 4 min. read

    Registry-Based vs. Claims-Based vs. GPRO

    ’Tis the CMS season of giving, and that means the 2016 Final Rule is out —thus, it’s time to prepare for PQRS . If it’s your first time reporting, you may be a bit confused by the different reporting options. Don’t worry; we were there once, too. That’s why we did a little—well, a lot—of research and put it all together in an easy-to-understand post (you’re totes welcome). Here’s what we know: Individual Claims-Based and Individual Registry-Based …

  • articleJan 11, 2011 | 5 min. read

    Webinar Update from CMS

    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Provider Communications Group will host a national provider conference call on the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System and Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program. The eRx Incentive Program is an incentive program for eligible professionals initially implemented in 2009 as a result of section 132(b) of the MIPPA.  The eRx Incentive Program promotes the adoption and use of eRx systems by individual eligible professionals and beginning with the 2010 eRx …

  • Founder Letter: Dodging Data will be Your Demise (or, Why You Should Complete PQRS)  Image

    articleNov 5, 2015 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: Dodging Data will be Your Demise (or, Why You Should Complete PQRS)

    By and large, Medicare’s 2016 Final Rule was underwhelming—and for most of us (including me), that probably warranted a big sigh of relief. But while there are no major changes on deck for this year, one thing that definitely should have caught your eye if you perused our Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule was the verbiage alluding to the future of PQRS—specifically, the possibility that PQRS reporting as we know it could cease to exist …

  • articleNov 2, 2011 | 3 min. read

    PQRS and Broccoli

    Just like eating your broccoli is not required, neither is PQRS. If you don’t do it, however, eventually you’ll get fined. And if you don’t eat your broccoli, Mom will probably send you to your room. Or worse, no dessert.  PQRS is one of those things that Mom may advise you to do. Why? Because it’s good for you. If you and your clinic start adopting your workflow for PQRS now, you’ll be better prepared for the …

  • MIPS FAQ for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleJan 25, 2017 | 9 min. read

    MIPS FAQ for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Unless you’ve been intentionally avoiding all discussions of healthcare changes for 2017, you’ve probably heard at least mention of CMS’s Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), which consolidates aspects of the Meaningful Use (MU), Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) , and Value-Based Payment Modifier (VM) programs. While MIPS went into effect on January 1, 2017, physical therapists (PTs), occupational therapists (OTs), and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) aren’t eligible to participate until at least 2019. And we’re all still waiting …

  • Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits Image

    articleOct 17, 2016 | 4 min. read

    Breaking News: 2017 MACRA Final Rule Hits

    After months of heated debate and public commentary—much of it coming from physicians who felt they needed more time to prepare themselves to participate in a brand-new quality reporting program—the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on Friday released its final rule on the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) . This act, which will go into effect January 1, 2017, reimburses eligible Medicare physicians based on the quality of care they deliver …

  • 9 Most Common Medicare Misconceptions for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    webinarSep 8, 2016

    9 Most Common Medicare Misconceptions for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    To say that Medicare regulations are confusing is an understatement. But, it’s not just the barely-readable government gobbledygook that throws providers for a loop; it’s also the fact that the rules are always changing. If you treat Medicare patients, we’re willing to bet you’ve been tripped up by at least one of these common misconceptions—maybe without even knowing it. And that could leave a nasty bruise on your practice’s bottom line—especially if you ever find yourself at …

  • webinarDec 20, 2013

    Preparing for PQRS 2014

    In December, we hosted a webinar focused on the new PQRS regulations. This session broke down all the rules for 2014 to ensure you’ll be prepared to play by them and therefore not incur any penalties. During this presentation, we: Detailed the PQRS requirements for 2014 Described the different reporting methods Explained how you can ensure you successfully report

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.