Glowing Star Want to earn CEUs, network, and grow your practice? We'll see y'all in the Lone Star State. Attend Ascend.


The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) is a program designed by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to improve the quality of reporting in the healthcare industry. The program is now considered to be permanent and therefore the program name has been amended to the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). PQRS reporting is based on individual measures which are associated to a specific patient group by diagnosis, ailment, age, or clinical action taken by the reporting therapist. All Medicare Part B FFS (fee for service) patients are eligible, but must meet inclusion criteria for each measure.

There are 2 methods of reporting your clinical data to CMS:  Claims-based and Registry.  Choosing your reporting method is very important in reaching your 1% incentive goal.  What is the difference between the 2 methods?  What are the Pros and Cons of each?  Let’s explore:

Claims-based Reporting
With claims-based reporting, measures are tied to clinical practice reported on claims with CPT codes that link to measures. Data submission is the responsibility of the eligible professional or group practice themselves or your billing company may offer this service for an extra fee.

To qualify for your 0.5% incentive, you must report on at least 3 measures and report on 50% of eligible patients (this is a reduction from the 80% requirement of 2010).

Advantages of claims-based reporting

  1. You are in control of your own data from completion to submission
  2. Self auditing process developed to your clinic’s specific needs
  3. Cheaper – no added cost
  4. Only 50% reporting requirement
  5. OK for smaller practice or if Medicare is a small portion of your payer mix

Disadvantages of claims-based reporting:

  1. Must have someone in the clinic who will own this project: complete audits, know all the ins/outs of PQRS, keep record of the % completed
  2. Auditing process can be tedious and potentially a productivity loss for an employee
  3. You must complete and submit the proper forms in proper format for the eligible patients
  4. Workload could be significant if large % of your patients are Medicare or part of a large clinic
  5. No internal automated check/balance system completed by the billing company: submits only what you give them

Registry-based Reporting
With registry-based reporting, the eligible professional or group practice submits the data electronically to the registry, who then captures and stores the measure related data. The registry is then responsible for submitting the individual measure or measures group information to CMS on behalf of eligible professionals.  Registries provide CMS with calculated reporting and performance rates at the end of the reporting period.  Registries must pass stringent reporting method criteria annually and be qualified to participate. WebPT is one of only two certified EMR registries available in the PT industry.

Check out the most current list of Qualified Registries for 2010 PQRI Reporting is available at the CMS website. (The 2011 list has not been updated on the CMS website yet).

To qualify for your 0.5% incentive, you must report on at least 3 measures and report on 80% of eligible patients.

Advantages of registry-based reporting:

  1. Form creation and submission is done for you
  2. No need for auditing due to the EMR enforcing measure criteria and selecting eligible patients
  3. Staff productivity maintained
  4. Higher potential for meeting the reporting criteria and receiving your 0.5% incentive bonus
  5. Using a PT specific EMR registry gives you added insight and assistance with choosing most appropriate measures
  6. Measures are updated automatically each year as information is provided by CMS.

Disadvantages of registry-based reporting: 

  1. There is a cost involved; but if using WebPT it is nominal and definitely provides an ROI when staff time, paper/office supplies, and decreased stress levels are calculated
  2. 80% reporting requirement, but with the EMR in place, 100% data collection should be the expectation.
  3. Data collection enforcement with all eligible patients – no choice but to report on each patient

The 1% incentive may not seem like much of a bonus if you have to spend staff time and effort to get the proper codes into billing, complete audits to ensure your clinic is meeting its minimum criteria, and manually submitting claims to CMS. Although there is a cost associated with using a registry, the savings on staff time and maintaining productivity alone will be worth it.  

It also makes sense to choose a PT specific registry, like WebPT, which gives you the tools and outlines the measures in a way that streamlines to your workflow.  To me, registry reporting just makes more sense – leave the technical automated reporting method to the experts and let me use my clinical expertise to provide valuable feedback on how PTs impact patients’ lives daily.

PQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know - Regular BannerPQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know - Small Banner
  • articleNov 7, 2013

    FLR and PQRS: How Are They Different?

    Functional limitation reporting (FLR) and PQRS both fall under the ever-widening umbrella of Medicare regulations, and they both involve outcome measures and data codes. Still, they are completely separate requirements, each with its own set of rules. Confusing, we know. To help you sort out the differences, we’ve put together a short breakdown of each one as well as a detailed compare/contrast chart: The Basics of FLR On July 1, 2013, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services …

  • The Rehab Therapist’s Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule Image

    articleNov 4, 2015

    The Rehab Therapist’s Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule

    November is finally here, which means we here at WebPT can’t stop thinking about a juicy, flavorful, hot-out-of-the oven—Medicare Final Rule. While your tastebuds probably aren’t jumping with joy over the thought of chewing over a bunch of regulatory gobbledygook, the good news is that this year’s final rule shouldn’t be too tough to swallow (and if it is, you can always add more gravy). We’ve already picked out the most important pieces and served ’em up …

  • webinarFeb 7, 2011

    Take the Pain Out of Medicare (PQRS/PQRI Compliance)

    Improving Medicare and PQRS documentation in your PT clinic that can help your bottom line. This webinar was led by EMR expert and practicing physical therapist Heidi Jannenga and technology expert Michael Mannheimer. Webinar attendees will learn the answers to: What is PQRS and why should I care? Is it true that PQRS will be mandatory? What Medicare changes have been enacted recently? What measures are available and best for my clinic? How can I improve my …

  • articleNov 29, 2011

    PQRS: The Case for Registry over Claims Based Reporting

    Here at WebPT HQ, we are gearing up for PQRS 2012. One of the pieces of PQRS that is most commonly misunderstood is the difference between claims and registry based services. Let's take a minute and clear this up. Claims and registry-based reporting both result in the same outcome for your clinic-- successful participation in PQRS. WebPT offers both options with claims-based being priced $99 per calendar year and registry-based at $299 for the calendar year. Many …

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. Questions related to: • WebPT • Modifier 59 • Other Modifiers • Coding • ICD-10 • …

  • articleNov 6, 2012

    Pass the PQRS, Please!

    Today's blog post comes from WebPT Co-Founder Heidi Jannenga, PT, MPT, ATC/L. Can you believe it’s already November? That means two things: Thanksgiving and PQRS 2013 (if you treat Medicare patients, of course). I know we’d much rather fill our thoughts—and bellies—with turkey, dressing, and buttery mashed potatoes. But you have to make room somewhere for Physicians Quality Reporting System (PQRS, formerly known as PQRI). You can’t smother it with gravy or tuck it behind excess cans …

  • GPRO 2015: Is it Worth it? Image

    articleNov 19, 2014

    GPRO 2015: Is it Worth it?

    Last week, we covered the registry-and claims-based reporting methods for PQRS. In this post, I’ll discuss the complexities associated with reporting PQRS using the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO). In past years, GPRO seemed to be the most practical option for practices with more than two eligible professionals. This year, however, Medicare added more stipulations to the GPRO program—and in some cases, those add-ons might make the whole thing more trouble than it’s worth. The Basics of …

  • PQRS 2016 FAQ Image

    articleDec 10, 2015

    PQRS 2016 FAQ

    Yesterday, we hosted a webinar focused on PQRS 2016. We received a lot of questions during the live session—so many, in fact, that we’ve amassed them here in a handy FAQ. Got a question and don’t see an answer below? Ask it in the comment section at the bottom of this post. Eligibility Do I have to participate in PQRS? What makes me an eligible provider? If you are a healthcare professional providing services paid under or …

  • articleSep 6, 2011

    CMS, Patient Level Data and Outcomes: What should we be measuring?

    What should we be measuring? Recently, there has been some debate from EMR providers over the type of data that should be provided to CMS when reporting clinical outcomes. CMS, in a newly proposed rule, wants to define and begin to use a new measure called CQM . CQM stands for Clinical Quality Measure and is used to establish the top tier providers for the effectiveness and necessity of specific treatments.   The Issue The issue here …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.