It’s a new year, and you know what that means: a new PQRS reporting period. Many WebPT Members have already started reporting PQRS data—and that’s great. The sooner you begin reporting, the sooner you’ll reach the minimum reporting requirements and thus ensure you avoid the 2% penalty.

As you might recall from this blog post, you have a few different options when it comes to satisfactory PQRS reporting. For those practitioners who treat a large population of Medicare patients with back pain, we recommended reporting on the back pain measures group, as it is by far the easiest way to not only avoid the penalty, but also earn the 0.5% incentive payment that is available to those who report to the highest possible degree.

Initial Visit vs. Episode
However, the wording Medicare used to explain the requirements for the back pain measures group was a bit confusing, and we’ve received several requests for clarification. According to Medicare’s specifications for this measure (Measure #148: Back Pain: Initial Visit), eligible patients must have a qualifying back pain diagnosis and must not have been “seen or treated for back pain by any practitioner during the 4 months prior to the first clinical encounter with a diagnosis of back pain.”

At first glance, that stipulation may appear to exclude patients who initially saw a physician before being referred to physical therapy. Thankfully, that is not the case. Medicare is merely targeting a more chronic pain patient population who has procrastinated—as many do—before seeking medical attention.  In other words, the date of injury or pain onset must be at least four months prior to the patient’s first visit with any medical professional. Although it’s not immediately clear in the above excerpt, you can report on a patient who has already seen another provider—such as a physician or chiropractor—during a particular episode as long as the patient experienced back pain for at least four months prior to seeking any type of medical treatment. Upon seeking treatment for back pain—whether it’s a recurrence of prior pain or an onset of new pain—the first visit to any medical professional triggers the start of a new episode. But if the patient sees both a primary care physician and a specialist (e.g., a PT), both visits are considered the initial visit for each clinician, and both clinicians can report on the back pain measures group for that patient, even though they are treating within the same episode. In fact, further down in the measure specification document, Medicare provides this direction: “If a patient has a four-month period without treatment, and then sees both a primary care physician and a specialist, both visits are considered the initial visit with that clinician.”

Another common scenario involves returning patients (i.e., those who discontinued therapy for their back pain but later returned for further treatment). In such cases, the key factor in patients’ eligibility for the back pain measures group is the amount of time that has elapsed since the patient’s last date of treatment. If at least four months have passed during which the patient sought no medical treatment for his or her back pain (from any medical professional, not just you or another physical therapist), then the patient would enter a new episode and therefore would qualify for back pain reporting. Per CMS: “A new episode can either be a recurrence for a patient with prior back pain or a patient with a new onset of back pain. The first clinical encounter after the four months without being seen or treated for back pain is considered the beginning of the new episode.”

Qualifying Patients
Speaking of first encounters, please remember that to satisfactorily report on the back pain measures group, you must report at the initial visit for each qualifying patient. This means that if the patient’s initial visit for an episode of back pain occurred prior to the beginning of the reporting period (i.e., before January 1, 2014) this patient will not count toward the required 20-patient sample.

Also, please note that if—and this is a big “if”—the patient is receiving therapy post-surgery, that patient does not qualify for the back pain measures group unless it has been four months since surgery and he or she has not received any other treatment over the course of that four-month period (which is a highly unlikely scenario).

My Recommendation
Still, I feel strongly that a physical therapy practice with a steady volume of Medicare back pain patients can meet the reporting requirements for the back pain measures group, especially if that practice has a back specialty program. From what I can surmise, the purpose of the back pain measures group is to collect data related to chronic back pain. I know four months without treatment may seem like a long period of time, but during my time as a practicing therapist, I frequently treated lower back pain on patients who experienced pain for years without seeking medical attention. They were simply waiting for the pain to become unbearable. Those patients would absolutely qualify for this measure. Thus, when assessing whether the back pain measures group would be a sound reporting option for your practice, you should consider how many chronic back pain patients you see and treat.

PT Billing Secrets: 5 Things Payers Don’t Want You to Know - Regular BannerPT Billing Secrets: 5 Things Payers Don’t Want You to Know - Small Banner
  • articleNov 5, 2013 | 3 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS 2014

    Well, it’s November already, and that means two things: Thanksgiving and Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Sure, PQRS doesn’t involve mouthwatering roasted turkey, savory stuffing, or creamy mashed potatoes, but it has become quite the November tradition for us here at WebPT. You see, this is the time of year that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) typically confirms the details of next year’s reporting requirements, thus allowing us to update our PQRS solution (claims- …

  • articleNov 4, 2013 | 3 min. read

    What PQRS Could Look Like in 2014

    On July 19, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register. According to this summary , most of the policies were open for comment until September 6, 2013 and, pending final decisions (which hopefully will occur this month), will take effect on January 1, 2014. The 605-page document contains proposals for policy changes on everything from reimbursements to the …

  • articleNov 7, 2013 | 2 min. read

    FLR and PQRS: How Are They Different?

    Functional limitation reporting (FLR) and PQRS both fall under the ever-widening umbrella of Medicare regulations, and they both involve outcome measures and data codes. Still, they are completely separate requirements, each with its own set of rules. Confusing, we know. To help you sort out the differences, we’ve put together a short breakdown of each one as well as a detailed compare/contrast chart: The Basics of FLR On July 1, 2013, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services …

  • Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On Image

    articleDec 6, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: PQRS is Dead, But Your Data-Analysis Efforts Should Live On

    If there’s one thing I know about rehab therapists, it’s that we are all very busy people. If your to-do list is anything like mine, it’s growing faster than you can prune it—and has probably expanded onto multiple sheets of paper (or maybe even into multiple notebooks). And regardless of the value associated with each item on the docket, we tend to refer to these tasks as things we “have” to do—not things we “get” to do. …

  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. (And be sure to check out this separate PT billing FAQ we recently put together.) Questions …

  • PQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know Image

    webinarNov 4, 2015

    PQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know

    At this point, you’d think satisfying PQRS requirements would be child’s play, but unfortunately, Medicare changes the rules every year. Fortunately, we’ve already combed through the 2016 Final Rule for you and organized everything you need to know about PQRS into a jam-packed, super educational 60-minute webinar. Join us for this beneficial seminar, where hosts Heidi Jannenga and Charlotte Bohnett will: detail 2016 reporting requirements; describe the different reporting methods; and explain how to ensure you successfully …

  • Last Legs: The Compliance Vulnerabilities of Dead or Dying Software Image

    articleOct 24, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Last Legs: The Compliance Vulnerabilities of Dead or Dying Software

    Rusty mechanical equipment. Creaky carnival rides. Wobbly chairs. People are naturally skeptical of things that are dilapidated, rundown, or slipshod—and with good reason. After all, that which is ramshackle usually isn’t reliable. Now, imagine it’s the physical therapy software you use everyday to run your rehab therapy practice that’s gone derelict. Take PTOS EMR, for example , because if you didn’t know, this therapy office software is going out of business, and it has ceased all updates …

  • Founder Letter: Dodging Data will be Your Demise (or, Why You Should Complete PQRS)  Image

    articleNov 5, 2015 | 6 min. read

    Founder Letter: Dodging Data will be Your Demise (or, Why You Should Complete PQRS)

    By and large, Medicare’s 2016 Final Rule was underwhelming—and for most of us (including me), that probably warranted a big sigh of relief. But while there are no major changes on deck for this year, one thing that definitely should have caught your eye if you perused our Quick Guide to the 2016 Final Rule was the verbiage alluding to the future of PQRS—specifically, the possibility that PQRS reporting as we know it could cease to exist …

  • articleNov 6, 2013 | 2 min. read

    Functional Limitation Reporting in a Nutshell

    Hopefully, you’ve been working your functional limitation reporting (FLR) magic for months now, so you’ve got it down pat. If not, you’re probably running into more than your fair share of claim denials. Don’t worry; we’re here to help. Here are some FLR basics in a convenient chestnut shell. (It is almost that time of the year , after all). What is FLR? Beginning July 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require that …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.