Politics and party lines aside, it’s tough to debate the need for improvement in the current state of US healthcare. After all, the World Health Report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance, did rank the US health care system as 37th. In the world. Trending downward. 

According to “Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System,” published in The New England Journal of Medicine, “the conceptual framework underlying the rankings proposed that health systems should be assessed by comparing the extent to which investments in public health and medical care were contributing to critical social objectives: improving health, reducing health disparities, protecting households from impoverishment due to medical expenses, and providing responsive services that respect the dignity of patients.” 

In an effort to keep everything copasetic, I’ll avoid a deep discussion here about the recent Supreme Court decision on the Obama Administration’s Affordable Care Act. Instead, I’ll state something we can all agree on—the importance of creating electronic versions of all patient information and medical records, i.e., an electronic medical record (EMR). In fact, this was one of the few issues that both Republicans and Democrats agreed upon. In this case, health data = gold.

Dr. Jody Ranck, a global health policy and health technology researcher and strategist, wrote an article for Forbes entitled, “How Connected Health, Public-Private Cooperation, and Big Data Can Revolutionize Health Care.” In addition to discussing some of the deeper issues arising from the NFIB v. Sebelius decision, Ranck discusses the specific challenge of EMR interoperability, and, because all challenges are ultimately opportunities, he posits that this is a significant one for the public and private technology sectors.

“Having the ability to choose different devices and technologies to collect and store our [health] data and to be able to move that data from one health plan to another or across healthcare providers is no easy feat,” Ranck says. “Most large healthcare IT programs in the 1990s–early 2000s were very capital intensive, lengthy technology implementations that are expensive to replace.”

In other words, they’re server-based and require significant investments in both time and money. And, because many of these systems are unable to communicate with one another, the industry is left with behemoth, dinosaur-like programs that don’t play nice with others (think Sarah the Triceratops on steroids).

According to “Epic Challenge: What The Emergence of an EMR Giant Means For the Future of Healthcare Innovation,” contributed by David Shaywitz in Forbes,  “Any one company’s EMR system isn’t particularly compatible with the EMR system from another company, resulting in—or, more fairly, perpetuating—the Tower of Babel that effectively exists as medical practices often lack the ability to share basic information easily with one another.”

So what’s the next step in EMR interoperability? According to Shaywitz, it’s a software-as-a-service-based (SaaS) open data approach that will win out because this architecture provides flexibility, nimbleness, and cost effectiveness. But has the dawn of the lightweight, agile, and cloud-based niche electronic medical record systems truly begun? (Think WebPT for physical therapists.) Or can the dinosaurs evolve? Only time will tell, and these next few years will certainly be pivotal in the digital health landscape.

The Physical Therapists Guide to Contract Negotiation - Regular BannerThe Physical Therapists Guide to Contract Negotiation - Small Banner
  • articleAug 15, 2011 | 2 min. read

    How can an EMR in the Cloud Increase Profits for my Clinic

    By now, everyone is aware of the financial incentives available for clinicians who switch to Electronic Medical Records. The incentives are supposed to help clinics offset their costs while they digitize their entire office, including getting rid of those awful filing cabinets. Before too much excitement sets in, you should also be aware that while rehab professionals are not eligible for the financial incentives . The reasons for this exclusion are confusing, but we will save that …

  • The Case for Specialized Software: Why Your Hospital EHR Hinders Patient Care and Increases Risk Image

    articleJul 28, 2016 | 6 min. read

    The Case for Specialized Software: Why Your Hospital EHR Hinders Patient Care and Increases Risk

    If you Google “hospital EHR,” you’ll initially receive an overwhelming number of search results for the EHR systems themselves—essentially, advertisements and promotions for their software. Wade through those results, though, and you’ll uncover a wealth of articles in which hospital practitioners complain about their technology and how it negatively impacts patient care. Search “private practice EHR,” and you’ll encounter the same thing. And these complaints are, by and large, voiced by physicians—the people for whom these systems …

  • articleSep 10, 2011 | 3 min. read

    Should the Government standardize EMR usability?

    Usability provides the foundation At WebPT, we are glad that the EMR industry is finally realizing that usability is the key to adoption . The widespread use of Electronic Medical Records will not only save money and time for providers, but also for patients. The benefits of full EMR adoption are immense.   Proposed "solution" to increase usability  What is somewhat perplexing is the method that is being proposed to increase usability of existing systems. A recent …

  • 3 Newsworthy Notes about the HITECH Act in 2015 Image

    articleMay 27, 2015 | 6 min. read

    3 Newsworthy Notes about the HITECH Act in 2015

    The HITECH Act ignited a fervor in the healthcare industry in the early 2010s. Part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (a.k.a. the HITECH Act) incentivizes the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health record (EHR) systems—and penalizes those who fail to do either. According to CMS , eligible providers could receive incentives up to $44,000 through Medicare and up to $63,750 through …

  • webinarAug 9, 2011

    Understanding Security and Technology Behind Cloud-Based Applications

    Have you ever wondered what 'The Cloud' actually means? Wish there was an easy way to understand the technology you are currently using? This webinar was hosted by WebPT Expert, Michael Manheimer, joined by WebPT Co-Founders Brad and Heidi Jannenga. Webinar attendees will learn: What exactly is cloud computing? What makes cloud computing different from traditional models? What type of security does a cloud vendor offer? WebPT will debunk a few myths about 'The Cloud' itself.

  • articleOct 9, 2012 | 4 min. read

    Nine Questions to Ask Your Cloud Vendor

    Today’s post comes from WebPT copywriters Charlotte Bohnett and Erica Cohen So, you’ve decided to ditch the pen and paper and take your practice into the cloud―maybe through a payroll service , an email marketing tool , or even (hopefully!) an EMR . Now what? As you shop around for a cloud-based vendor to meet your clinic’s needs, be sure to get answers to the following nine questions.   1.) Is this truly cloud-based? Many companies claim …

  • articleApr 1, 2011 | 4 min. read

    Automating Your PT Practice Documentation is the Green thing to Do

    There are many costs that go into running a physical therapy (PT) practice that are above and beyond just the equipment and expertise needed to care for your patients. The costs of running an office, overhead and other supplies must be put into the budget. One of the biggest costs is the overhead of managing your PT practice documentation. That is a cost that is easy to lose control over, especially if you have mountains of paperwork …

  • articleSep 20, 2011 | 3 min. read

    One-Size-Fits-All Software Might Be The Root Cause of Lost Productivity

    Fits like a Glove? A recent article assessing the effect of EMR Implementation on clinical productivity came to a rather common sense solution. The evaluation found that “ different tools work better in different settings and that one-size-fits-all is not a valid approach to EHR implementation. ” This finding is predictable and holds true in almost all applications. The interesting part of this article is where the assessment goes next. They go on to speak about usability …

  • articleMay 14, 2011 | 4 min. read

    The Pros and Cons of Handheld Electronic Medical Records

    With the advent of computerized medical documentation systems, much has changed in how things might be done in the average physical therapy practice. How patient records are maintained and accessed has changed considerably. When a digital version of patient care documentation is fully in place, the need for those long rows of filing cabinets disappears. For most employees of any physical therapy practice, that is indeed good news. Along with the changes to how patient data is …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.