The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), has quite a storied history for a code set that has yet to go into effect here in the US. With the multiple delays it has suffered, you might be wondering why on Earth we’re even making the switch. I mean, ICD-9 has done fine thus far, and the delays only prove that, right? Wrong. Not to sound like a politician, but not only is ICD-9 bad for health care, it’s bad for America. And I’ll prove it.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner

ICD-9 Drawbacks

For starters, ICD-9 is 35 years old. For some perspective, people still smoked in medical facilities 35 years ago. I mean, the Internet didn’t even exist then. Besides the fact that ICD-9 is no spring chicken, it also lacks specificity. With only 13,000 codes, ICD-9 fails to provide enough details or accuracy—both in terms of medical conditions as well as services and procedures—for modern healthcare delivery. This produces incorrect and limited data, which can lead to issues with reimbursements and audits. Furthermore, the code set’s terminology is antiquated and, in some instances, obsolete.

ICD-10 Benefits

ICD-10 is newer than ICD-9, the codes inherently feature updated disease classification and medical terminology. An added bonus: the set contains codes that allow for comparison of mortality and morbidity data. Additionally, ICD-10 has five times as many codes as ICD-9, which means the set is vastly more specific than its predecessor. And greater specificity leads to:

  • Improved ability to measure services and conduct public health surveillance
  • Increased insight for refining grouping and reimbursement methodologies
  • Decreased need to include supporting documentation with claims

All of that means better data, which improves how we:

  • Measure patient care
  • Conduct research
  • Design payment systems
  • Process claims
  • Make clinical decisions
  • Track public health
  • Identify fraud and abuse

Download your ICD-10 comparison now.

Enter your email address below, and we'll email you an ICD-10 vs. ICD-9 infographic.

Please enable JavaScript to submit form.

While I can’t see your face, I’m convinced that you’re a believer. ICD-10 is a good thing, and there’s no stayin’ stuck with ICD-9. Now all you have to do is prepare for the inevitable, and that means making believers out of your staff and peers. Need help convincing them that ICD-10 is something they should embrace rather than dread? Download our comparison graphic in the box above.

  • A Farewell Ode to ICD-9 Image

    articleSep 30, 2015 | 2 min. read

    A Farewell Ode to ICD-9

    As the hours count down It’s hard to believe That we’ve finally made it To ICD-10 Eve Our journey to get here Hasn’t been without strife As the US has clung To ICD-9 for dear life Letting go can be hard And change can be tough But in the modern medical world ICD-9 just isn’t enough Unlike a fine wine That gets better with time ICD-9 has aged poorly— It’s way past its prime Sure, we’ll always …

  • ICD-10 FAQs Image

    articleFeb 28, 2015 | 6 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQs

    We recently hosted a webinar focused on helping PTS, OTs, and SLPs prepare for the ICD-10 switch. We got a lot of questions—so many, in fact, that we decided to organize the most common ones into an easy-to-reference blog post. Read on to find the answers to all your burning ICD-10 queries. Don’t see your question? Post it in the comments section below, and we’ll find you an answer. Does ICD-10 affect CPT codes? According to this …

  • How to Test ICD-10 Externally Image

    articleApr 29, 2014 | 3 min. read

    How to Test ICD-10 Externally

    Today, we’re tackling how to test ICD-10 externally. (We discussed testing internally yesterday. Click here if you missed it.) The point of testing is to ensure that—come the mandatory transition deadline—you, your processes, and your systems are all working in harmony so you get paid for doing what you do best: treating your patients. According to Carl Natale, editor of ICD10Watch and author of this article , proper testing should help you: “Verify that [your] practice can …

  • Founder Letter: ICD-10 Delayed Until 2015 Image

    articleApr 1, 2014 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: ICD-10 Delayed Until 2015

    I originally planned to start this founder letter with “T-minus six months and counting until ICD-10.” However, yesterday, the Senate passed HR 4302, which delays a 24% fee schedule cut, extends the therapy cap exceptions process (i.e., use of the KX modifier), and pushes the ICD-10 implementation date to next year—as in October 1, 2015. For some of you, this might elicit a sigh of relief, but those who were ready are sighing in disbelief. President Obama …

  • The History of ICD-10 Image

    articleOct 9, 2013 | 3 min. read

    The History of ICD-10

    As we’ve stated in previous blog posts, the US will transition to ICD-10 codes on October 1, 2015—to some of you, that might seem like a quickly approaching date. Others might be wondering, “What’s the rush?” Know that it only seems hurried now because of pesky procrastination. To truly understand this, we must delve into the history of ICD-10. In the beginning... The World Health Organization (WHO), the public health sector of the United Nations, which focuses …

  • Beware of ICD-10 Shortcuts: The Case Against One-to-One Crosswalking Image

    articleFeb 24, 2015 | 7 min. read

    Beware of ICD-10 Shortcuts: The Case Against One-to-One Crosswalking

    ICD-10 is inherently more sophisticated and specific than ICD-9, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s more complicated. So, why are healthcare professionals pulling their hair out over the mandatory transition to these new codes? Because learning ICD-10 is like learning a new language. If we were going into this with a clean slate–like a newborn babe—perhaps it wouldn’t be so tough to learn the language. Unfortunately, though, the US healthcare industry has relied on ICD-9 codes for …

  • ICD-10 Bootcamp: Coding Exercises for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    webinarJul 30, 2015

    ICD-10 Bootcamp: Coding Exercises for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    As the old saying goes, “Practice makes perfect.” But with the transition to ICD-10 kicking off in a little more than a month, there’s not a whole lot of practice time left. Before you know it, you’ll be taking the field for game time—and this is one game where you definitely can’t rely on talent alone. Looking for a way to get you and your staff members in ICD-10-coding shape—fast? Consider this your ICD-10 boot camp. In …

  • Have You Considered These 3 ICD-10 To-Dos? Image

    articleFeb 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Have You Considered These 3 ICD-10 To-Dos?

    “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.” That’s how the age-old adage goes, but aside from it being a totally messed-up saying—why are we eating elephants?—it also falls totally flat in my book. When we talk about eating an elephant, it implies that we’re devouring something. In reality, though, with any significant or substantial endeavor, we’re actually trying to triumph. And I’m not sure if anyone would count gorging on a pachyderm as …

  • The Physical Therapist’s Crunch-Time Guide to ICD-10 Image

    downloadJun 24, 2015

    The Physical Therapist’s Crunch-Time Guide to ICD-10

    ICD-10 went into effect on October 1, 2015, and if your practice went into the transition unprepared, you could suffer reduced payments—or worse, flat-out denials. It’s never too late to get up-to-speed with the Physical Therapist’s Crunch-Time Guide to ICD-10. Enter your email address below to download it.

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.