The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), has quite a storied history for a code set that has yet to go into effect here in the US. With the multiple delays it has suffered, you might be wondering why on Earth we’re even making the switch. I mean, ICD-9 has done fine thus far, and the delays only prove that, right? Wrong. Not to sound like a politician, but not only is ICD-9 bad for health care, it’s bad for America. And I’ll prove it.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner

ICD-9 Drawbacks

For starters, ICD-9 is 35 years old. For some perspective, people still smoked in medical facilities 35 years ago. I mean, the Internet didn’t even exist then. Besides the fact that ICD-9 is no spring chicken, it also lacks specificity. With only 13,000 codes, ICD-9 fails to provide enough details or accuracy—both in terms of medical conditions as well as services and procedures—for modern healthcare delivery. This produces incorrect and limited data, which can lead to issues with reimbursements and audits. Furthermore, the code set’s terminology is antiquated and, in some instances, obsolete.

ICD-10 Benefits

ICD-10 is newer than ICD-9, the codes inherently feature updated disease classification and medical terminology. An added bonus: the set contains codes that allow for comparison of mortality and morbidity data. Additionally, ICD-10 has five times as many codes as ICD-9, which means the set is vastly more specific than its predecessor. And greater specificity leads to:

  • Improved ability to measure services and conduct public health surveillance
  • Increased insight for refining grouping and reimbursement methodologies
  • Decreased need to include supporting documentation with claims

All of that means better data, which improves how we:

  • Measure patient care
  • Conduct research
  • Design payment systems
  • Process claims
  • Make clinical decisions
  • Track public health
  • Identify fraud and abuse

Download your ICD-10 comparison now.

Enter your email address below, and we'll email you an ICD-10 vs. ICD-9 infographic.

Please enable JavaScript to submit form.

While I can’t see your face, I’m convinced that you’re a believer. ICD-10 is a good thing, and there’s no stayin’ stuck with ICD-9. Now all you have to do is prepare for the inevitable, and that means making believers out of your staff and peers. Need help convincing them that ICD-10 is something they should embrace rather than dread? Download our comparison graphic in the box above.

  • Dual-Coding Wonder Twin Powers: Activate? Image

    articleSep 2, 2015 | 3 min. read

    Dual-Coding Wonder Twin Powers: Activate?

    Thirty days has September—and so has your clinic to prepare for ICD-10. Just one month from now, you’ll have to start using ICD-10 codes on most claims with dates of service on or after October 1, 2015. Did you see I wrote, “most”? That’s not a typo. The reason I can’t say “all” is because not all payers are switching to ICD-10. That means you’ll have to be bi-code-lingual (so don’t purge your brain of all ICD-9 …

  • Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World Image

    articleOct 28, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Dawn of the ICD-10: Life in the Post-Transition World

    Some of you might remember all of the hype around Y2K. Rumors and speculation were abuzz, and there were people who thought all hell was going to break loose when the clock struck midnight on January 1, 2000. And then—dun, dun, dun—nothing happened. The Hyperbolic Hype The lead-up to October 1 was similar in many respects, albeit on a much smaller scale. People all over the healthcare community were freaking out about the unknown; some large practices …

  • Mythbusters: The ICD-10 Special Image

    articleAug 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Mythbusters: The ICD-10 Special

    Healthcare coding is having a bit of a cast change: ICD-9 is out and ICD-10 is taking over. By now, you’ve heard all about the new code set—but do you really have all the facts? In this special blog post, I’ll be busting some common ICD-10 misconceptions. (Sadly, my myth-busting measures don’t involve swimming in syrup, experimenting with explosives, or blowing up boats—we’ll leave that to the experts .) Let’s get to it! 1. The World Health …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux Image

    articleSep 24, 2015 | 16 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux

    Just when we thought we’d gotten every ICD-10 question under the sun, we got, well, more questions. Like, a lot more. But, we take that as a good sign, because like a scrappy reporter trying to get to the bottom of a big story, our audience of blog readers and webinar attendees aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions—which means they’re serious about preparing themselves for the changes ahead. And we’re equally serious about providing them with …

  • You've Got a Friend in EMR: Why a Web-Based Solution Will Be the ICD-10 Hero Your Clinic Needs Image

    articleFeb 25, 2015 | 4 min. read

    You've Got a Friend in EMR: Why a Web-Based Solution Will Be the ICD-10 Hero Your Clinic Needs

    ICD-10 adoption in the US is long overdue , and adoption is necessary to ensure patient record accuracy as health care evolves. To make way for the inevitable changes that will follow that evolutionary path, the new code set is complex enough to account for future unknowns. Plus, it allows therapists and other providers to accurately report diagnoses for conditions that are part of the modern medical repertoire but do not currently exist within the ICD-9 code …

  • 'Twas the Night Before ICD-10 Image

    articleSep 9, 2015 | 3 min. read

    'Twas the Night Before ICD-10

    By the end of September, it’ll officially be fall . That means that in most cities across the US, you can enjoy the fuzzy comfort of wearing sweaters (at least in places other than Arizona, because it’s hot until, well, always ). Whatever the weather, it’s not going to stop me from anticipating Christmas (as you could probably guess by my title). But there’s more to the end of September than pumpkin spice lattes and holly-jolly anticipation …

  • Is Your Physical Therapy Software Ready for ICD-10? Image

    articleAug 25, 2015 | 6 min. read

    Is Your Physical Therapy Software Ready for ICD-10?

    At this point, the majority of physical therapy clinics are using some type of software to document, schedule, and bill for patient treatment. Thanks to ever-increasing compliance regulations, paper had to go the way of the VHS, becoming nearly obsolete. When your practice switched from paper to software, it was a big change. The process took time and training, and there undoubtedly was a period of adjustment. Now, you’re faced with another switch: ICD-10. And just as …

  • Founder Letter: It’s a Brave New ICD-10 World Image

    articleOct 7, 2015 | 4 min. read

    Founder Letter: It’s a Brave New ICD-10 World

    October 1—the day that marked the transition to ICD-10—is behind us; we made it. And so far, so good. According to this Modern Healthcare article : “One of the most maligned and feared events in healthcare history began with a whimper.” Although ICD-Day has come and gone, it’s prudent to remember that a “whimper” of an introduction doesn’t necessarily indicate what’s to come. That’s because many of ICD-10’s repercussions have yet to reveal themselves—especially when it comes …

  • ICD-9 vs ICD-10 Image

    downloadMar 3, 2015

    ICD-9 vs ICD-10

    ICD-10 is much more than just an upgraded version of ICD-9. In fact, ICD-10 represents a complete overhaul of the diagnosis coding system as we knew it. In addition to offering five times as many codes as its predecessor, ICD-10 features an entirely different code structure. Here, we provide a couple of illustrated examples to show you how ICD-10 has changed the way you code for patient diagnoses.

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.