The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), has quite a storied history for a code set that has yet to go into effect here in the US. With the multiple delays it has suffered, you might be wondering why on Earth we’re even making the switch. I mean, ICD-9 has done fine thus far, and the delays only prove that, right? Wrong. Not to sound like a politician, but not only is ICD-9 bad for health care, it’s bad for America. And I’ll prove it.

The State of Rehab Therapy in 2017 - Regular BannerThe State of Rehab Therapy in 2017 - Small Banner

ICD-9 Drawbacks

For starters, ICD-9 is 35 years old. For some perspective, people still smoked in medical facilities 35 years ago. I mean, the Internet didn’t even exist then. Besides the fact that ICD-9 is no spring chicken, it also lacks specificity. With only 13,000 codes, ICD-9 fails to provide enough details or accuracy—both in terms of medical conditions as well as services and procedures—for modern healthcare delivery. This produces incorrect and limited data, which can lead to issues with reimbursements and audits. Furthermore, the code set’s terminology is antiquated and, in some instances, obsolete.

ICD-10 Benefits

ICD-10 is newer than ICD-9, the codes inherently feature updated disease classification and medical terminology. An added bonus: the set contains codes that allow for comparison of mortality and morbidity data. Additionally, ICD-10 has five times as many codes as ICD-9, which means the set is vastly more specific than its predecessor. And greater specificity leads to:

  • Improved ability to measure services and conduct public health surveillance
  • Increased insight for refining grouping and reimbursement methodologies
  • Decreased need to include supporting documentation with claims

All of that means better data, which improves how we:

  • Measure patient care
  • Conduct research
  • Design payment systems
  • Process claims
  • Make clinical decisions
  • Track public health
  • Identify fraud and abuse

Download your ICD-10 comparison now.

Enter your email address below, and we'll email you an ICD-10 vs. ICD-9 infographic.

Please enable JavaScript to submit form.

While I can’t see your face, I’m convinced that you’re a believer. ICD-10 is a good thing, and there’s no stayin’ stuck with ICD-9. Now all you have to do is prepare for the inevitable, and that means making believers out of your staff and peers. Need help convincing them that ICD-10 is something they should embrace rather than dread? Download our comparison graphic in the box above.

  • Can You Ever Use an Unspecified ICD-10 Code? Image

    articleApr 22, 2014 | 4 min. read

    Can You Ever Use an Unspecified ICD-10 Code?

    With five times as many codes as ICD-9, ICD-10 is certainly more specific. It’s no wonder, then, that the use of unspecified codes has become a common topic of discussion among healthcare professionals. Unspecified codes are incredibly common in coding with ICD-9. However, there’s a general consensus that using unspecified ICD-10 codes could prove detrimental. In addition to corrupting the reliability and validity of the data, the use of unspecified codes could lead to claim denials. With …

  • This Week in PT News, June 12 Image

    articleJun 12, 2015 | 2 min. read

    This Week in PT News, June 12

    New Study Reveals Why Some Indigenous Cultures Don’t Experience Back Pain According to NPR, California acupuncturist Esther Gokhale recently conducted an investigation into the factors that might explain why some indigenous cultures don’t experience low back pain. Like 75% of Americans, Gokhale has experienced back pain, and she wasn’t convinced Western medicine could cure her ailment. So, she spent ten years visiting and studying populations that report having little to no back pain. She noticed that while …

  • Founder Letter: ICD-What? Image

    articleSep 3, 2015 | 7 min. read

    Founder Letter: ICD-What?

    By now, it’s obvious that the entire US healthcare system is going to face a huge change come October 1: the transition to ICD-10 . This new—well, new to us—way of coding has been on the discussion table for decades , and for the last several years, its implementation has been the topic of much anticipation as well as a fair amount of resistance. So, if you find yourself in the dark—completely unaware that ICD-10 is happening—then …

  • On a Scale of 1 to ICD-10, how Prepared are You? Image

    articleFeb 2, 2015 | 5 min. read

    On a Scale of 1 to ICD-10, how Prepared are You?

    Like yet another season of Survivor , ICD-10 is inevitable, and while the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) won’t drop you on a remote, hostile island when the ICD-10 switch happens, the new coding terrain may be just as unfamiliar, uncomfortable, and treacherous—unless you’re ready. Here’s how to win at ICD-10 (no shelter-building or fire-making required). Hit the Books Switching from a code set with roughly 13,000 codes to one with about 68,000 codes is …

  • Physical Therapy Billing for Beginners, Part 2 Image

    articleJun 17, 2014 | 3 min. read

    Physical Therapy Billing for Beginners, Part 2

    Yesterday, we covered some of the basics of physical therapy billing. (If you missed it, you can read the article in full here. ) Today, let’s keep things moving with a few more therapy billing tips: (In case you missed this blurb in the last post, I’ll say it once more for good measure: This article is by no means comprehensive, so we definitely recommend you seek the services of a billing expert before taking action.) The …

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part 4 Image

    articleNov 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part 4

    Like the many Land Before Time sequels, the versions of our ICD-10 FAQ keep on-a-comin’. But—unlike those beloved dinosaur tales—I don’t anticipate 12 more versions (plus a TV series) will be necessary to cover what’s to come with ICD-10. Still, the questions continue to roll in—albeit a bit slower than they did a couple of months ago. However, most of the inquiries we’ve received in recent weeks have been super specific. That’s why, our most recent webinar—the …

  • How to Test ICD-10 Externally Image

    articleApr 29, 2014 | 3 min. read

    How to Test ICD-10 Externally

    Today, we’re tackling how to test ICD-10 externally. (We discussed testing internally yesterday. Click here if you missed it.) The point of testing is to ensure that—come the mandatory transition deadline—you, your processes, and your systems are all working in harmony so you get paid for doing what you do best: treating your patients. According to Carl Natale, editor of ICD10Watch and author of this article , proper testing should help you: “Verify that [your] practice can …

  • A Farewell Ode to ICD-9 Image

    articleSep 30, 2015 | 2 min. read

    A Farewell Ode to ICD-9

    As the hours count down It’s hard to believe That we’ve finally made it To ICD-10 Eve Our journey to get here Hasn’t been without strife As the US has clung To ICD-9 for dear life Letting go can be hard And change can be tough But in the modern medical world ICD-9 just isn’t enough Unlike a fine wine That gets better with time ICD-9 has aged poorly— It’s way past its prime Sure, we’ll always …

  • ICD-10 FAQs Image

    articleFeb 28, 2015 | 6 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQs

    We recently hosted a webinar focused on helping PTS, OTs, and SLPs prepare for the ICD-10 switch. We got a lot of questions—so many, in fact, that we decided to organize the most common ones into an easy-to-reference blog post. Read on to find the answers to all your burning ICD-10 queries. Don’t see your question? Post it in the comments section below, and we’ll find you an answer. Does ICD-10 affect CPT codes? According to this …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.