In the face of the impending ICD-10 implementation, you might be afraid of getting lost in the mire of new codes, left to wander the metaphorical sewers as you scavenge for whatever relevant codes you can find. And when October 1 rolls around, you very well could stumble upon a shattered glass jar and four baby turtles, and—wait a second; this sounds a lot like the plot of a ’90s movie about life-sized teenage reptiles.

Even though ICD-10’s history is tumultuous—not unlike an action movie plot—the truth is that ICD-10 implementation is far from mutant ninja fiction. You might find the complexity of the new coding system daunting; but don’t worry, you’re not alone. Even Master Splinter himself would probably grimace at the thought of taking on this challenge. But here’s the good news: it doesn’t have to be painful. With a set process in place, determining the most accurate ICD-10 code—no matter the situation—can become as second-nature as ordering your favorite deep-dish pizza. All kidding aside, here are three simple steps to determine the right diagnosis code, as adapted from this article:

Triumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Regular BannerTriumph in the Triple-Aim Game: The Healthcare Executive’s Guide to Readmission Reduction, Patient Safety Promotion, and ACO Success - Small Banner

1. Cowabunga, Index!

To narrow down your ICD-10 code options for a particular diagnosis, start by looking up the main term in the alphabetic index. Once you’ve chosen the most relevant main term, find sub-terms to help you boil down your diagnosis even further. To make sure you consider all possibilities, look for additional cues in the instructional notes (e.g., “see,” “see also,” “with,”"without,” “due to,” and “code by site”).  

2. Totally Tabular

After you find the main term in the alphabetic index, you might land on a very general version of the code. Such codes typically include labels like “unspecified,” and most of them feature only three or four alphanumeric characters. In some cases, these codes are the most accurate codes available; in others, you might have to keep digging. To be sure you find the most specific code possible, verify the code within the tabular list, which:

  • Organizes the codes by disease and injury.
  • Accounts for severity.
  • Includes all possible coding options for each condition (these codes may contain anywhere from three to seven characters).
  • Denotes any applicable exclusions—which indicate when codes can or cannot be used together—for each block of codes. Here, CMS covers the two types of exclusion instructions:
    • “Excludes1: It means ‘NOT CODED HERE!’ An Excludes1 note indicates that the code excluded should never be used at the same time as the code above the Excludes1 note.”
    • “Excludes2: A type 2 excludes note represents ‘Not included here.’ An excludes2 note indicates that the condition excluded is not part of the condition it is excluded from but a patient may have both conditions at the same time. When an Excludes2 note appears under a code it is acceptable to use both the code and the excluded code together.”

Pay close attention to these types of instructions as you peruse the tabular index, because they often contain guidance that is key to pinpointing the most detailed, accurate, and complete diagnosis code available.

3. Mega Guideline Guidance

Think you’ve boiled down your code to the most specific version? Bodacious! Now, on to the final step: reviewing the ICD-10 manual for chapter-specific coding guidelines. At the beginning of each chapter, you’ll find notes with additional instructions related to that group of codes—for example, whether you need to consider reporting any supplementary codes such as external cause codes. In addition to these notes, the manual includes important sequencing order guidelines. Depending on the condition you’re treating—and its related causation—the sequencing order of the codes will vary. Additionally, you should review this CDC document that covers “conventions, general coding guidelines, and chapter specific guidelines.”


If you follow these three steps, you’ll reduce your chances of encountering coding errors. And after some practice, you might even find yourself a master in your own right—able to code W59.22XA, “struck by turtle, initial encounter,” faster than you can say, “Pepperoni, please!”

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part 4 Image

    articleNov 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part 4

    Like the many Land Before Time sequels, the versions of our ICD-10 FAQ keep on-a-comin’. But—unlike those beloved dinosaur tales—I don’t anticipate 12 more versions (plus a TV series) will be necessary to cover what’s to come with ICD-10. Still, the questions continue to roll in—albeit a bit slower than they did a couple of months ago. However, most of the inquiries we’ve received in recent weeks have been super specific. That’s why, our most recent webinar—the …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux Image

    articleSep 24, 2015 | 16 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux

    Just when we thought we’d gotten every ICD-10 question under the sun, we got, well, more questions. Like, a lot more. But, we take that as a good sign, because like a scrappy reporter trying to get to the bottom of a big story, our audience of blog readers and webinar attendees aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions—which means they’re serious about preparing themselves for the changes ahead. And we’re equally serious about providing them with …

  • The Case for Coders Image

    articleFeb 23, 2015 | 3 min. read

    The Case for Coders

    As the ICD-10 saga unfolds, providers and other stakeholders inevitably will find that the new codes are far more specific than ICD-9 . And because of that specificity, simple mistakes could lead to reimbursement delays and claim denials. To get ahead of the game and prevent denials, you’ll need some type of quality control to keep those tiny—but potentially costly—errors from occurring. One way to do that? Hire an outside expert: an ICD-10-trained medical coder. Decoding Coders …

  • Costly ICD-10 Traps and How to Avoid Them Image

    articleAug 26, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Costly ICD-10 Traps and How to Avoid Them

    Imagine you’re playing a game . More specifically: an ICD-10 Rube Goldberg-style game . To win, you have to scurry through a series of stages without getting caught in costly traps. But what happens when you find yourself at the mercy of the swiftly-turning plastic crank? Before you know it, the cage has lowered and you’re out of the game —forever separated from your cheddar. Okay, so ICD-10 isn’t a game of zany action on a crazy …

  • Founder Letter: 6 Predictions for 2016  Image

    articleDec 3, 2015 | 10 min. read

    Founder Letter: 6 Predictions for 2016

    According to Merriam-Webster , a prediction is “a statement about what will happen or might happen in the future.” I don’t know about you, but when I think about what’s in store for our industry, I’m not satisfied with applying that definition to my hopes for the future. Why? Because I’m about more than just making statements; I’m about taking action. So, how do we take steps to improve our bottom lines, the quality of our care, …

  • ICD-10 Bootcamp: Coding Exercises for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    webinarJul 30, 2015

    ICD-10 Bootcamp: Coding Exercises for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    As the old saying goes, “Practice makes perfect.” But with the transition to ICD-10 kicking off in a little more than a month, there’s not a whole lot of practice time left. Before you know it, you’ll be taking the field for game time—and this is one game where you definitely can’t rely on talent alone. Looking for a way to get you and your staff members in ICD-10-coding shape—fast? Consider this your ICD-10 boot camp. In …

  • ICD-10 Crash Course: Last-Minute Training for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    webinarSep 2, 2015

    ICD-10 Crash Course: Last-Minute Training for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    It’s officially here: the last month before all HIPAA-eligible professionals must switch to the ICD-10 code set. As the regret of procrastination washes over many of those professionals, they’re scrambling to ready themselves and their practices for the big switch. If you, like so many other rehab therapists, find yourself asking, “ICD-what?” then you’re in dire need of straightforward training—stat! Otherwise, you could leave your practice vulnerable to claim denials after October 1. Join us at 9:00 …

  • Will ICD-10 End the Paper Superbill? Image

    articleSep 8, 2015 | 2 min. read

    Will ICD-10 End the Paper Superbill?

    In a dark world filled with endless paperwork and thousands of billing codes, rehab therapy clinics need a hero. Many medical professionals would say their office hero is the paper superbill. It’s fast, convenient, and easy to use. But hold on to your spandex tights, because ICD-10 is coming—and it might just be the paper superbill’s kryptonite . Here’s why the ICD-10 paper superbill just doesn’t work: It’s longer. ICD-9 has around 13,000 codes, so your paper …

  • ICD-10 Open Forum Image

    webinarOct 5, 2015

    ICD-10 Open Forum

    On October 1, the US officially said RIP to ICD-9 and brought ICD-10 to life. For some of you, the transition might’ve been all sugar and spice—a real treat. But for many others, the switch to the new code set might’ve left you feeling overwhelmed, tricked, or even a bit scared. At the very least, you might be haunted by some lingering questions. That’s where we can help. We’ve brewed a cauldron filled to the brim with …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.