In the face of the impending ICD-10 implementation, you might be afraid of getting lost in the mire of new codes, left to wander the metaphorical sewers as you scavenge for whatever relevant codes you can find. And when October 1 rolls around, you very well could stumble upon a shattered glass jar and four baby turtles, and—wait a second; this sounds a lot like the plot of a ’90s movie about life-sized teenage reptiles.

Even though ICD-10’s history is tumultuous—not unlike an action movie plot—the truth is that ICD-10 implementation is far from mutant ninja fiction. You might find the complexity of the new coding system daunting; but don’t worry, you’re not alone. Even Master Splinter himself would probably grimace at the thought of taking on this challenge. But here’s the good news: it doesn’t have to be painful. With a set process in place, determining the most accurate ICD-10 code—no matter the situation—can become as second-nature as ordering your favorite deep-dish pizza. All kidding aside, here are three simple steps to determine the right diagnosis code, as adapted from this article:

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner

1. Cowabunga, Index!

To narrow down your ICD-10 code options for a particular diagnosis, start by looking up the main term in the alphabetic index. Once you’ve chosen the most relevant main term, find sub-terms to help you boil down your diagnosis even further. To make sure you consider all possibilities, look for additional cues in the instructional notes (e.g., “see,” “see also,” “with,”"without,” “due to,” and “code by site”).  

2. Totally Tabular

After you find the main term in the alphabetic index, you might land on a very general version of the code. Such codes typically include labels like “unspecified,” and most of them feature only three or four alphanumeric characters. In some cases, these codes are the most accurate codes available; in others, you might have to keep digging. To be sure you find the most specific code possible, verify the code within the tabular list, which:

  • Organizes the codes by disease and injury.
  • Accounts for severity.
  • Includes all possible coding options for each condition (these codes may contain anywhere from three to seven characters).
  • Denotes any applicable exclusions—which indicate when codes can or cannot be used together—for each block of codes. Here, CMS covers the two types of exclusion instructions:
    • “Excludes1: It means ‘NOT CODED HERE!’ An Excludes1 note indicates that the code excluded should never be used at the same time as the code above the Excludes1 note.”
    • “Excludes2: A type 2 excludes note represents ‘Not included here.’ An excludes2 note indicates that the condition excluded is not part of the condition it is excluded from but a patient may have both conditions at the same time. When an Excludes2 note appears under a code it is acceptable to use both the code and the excluded code together.”

Pay close attention to these types of instructions as you peruse the tabular index, because they often contain guidance that is key to pinpointing the most detailed, accurate, and complete diagnosis code available.

3. Mega Guideline Guidance

Think you’ve boiled down your code to the most specific version? Bodacious! Now, on to the final step: reviewing the ICD-10 manual for chapter-specific coding guidelines. At the beginning of each chapter, you’ll find notes with additional instructions related to that group of codes—for example, whether you need to consider reporting any supplementary codes such as external cause codes. In addition to these notes, the manual includes important sequencing order guidelines. Depending on the condition you’re treating—and its related causation—the sequencing order of the codes will vary. Additionally, you should review this CDC document that covers “conventions, general coding guidelines, and chapter specific guidelines.”


If you follow these three steps, you’ll reduce your chances of encountering coding errors. And after some practice, you might even find yourself a master in your own right—able to code W59.22XA, “struck by turtle, initial encounter,” faster than you can say, “Pepperoni, please!”

  • Founder Letter: It’s a Brave New ICD-10 World Image

    articleOct 7, 2015 | 4 min. read

    Founder Letter: It’s a Brave New ICD-10 World

    October 1—the day that marked the transition to ICD-10—is behind us; we made it. And so far, so good. According to this Modern Healthcare article : “One of the most maligned and feared events in healthcare history began with a whimper.” Although ICD-Day has come and gone, it’s prudent to remember that a “whimper” of an introduction doesn’t necessarily indicate what’s to come. That’s because many of ICD-10’s repercussions have yet to reveal themselves—especially when it comes …

  • Mythbusters: The ICD-10 Special Image

    articleAug 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Mythbusters: The ICD-10 Special

    Healthcare coding is having a bit of a cast change: ICD-9 is out and ICD-10 is taking over. By now, you’ve heard all about the new code set—but do you really have all the facts? In this special blog post, I’ll be busting some common ICD-10 misconceptions. (Sadly, my myth-busting measures don’t involve swimming in syrup, experimenting with explosives, or blowing up boats—we’ll leave that to the experts .) Let’s get to it! 1. The World Health …

  • A Farewell Ode to ICD-9 Image

    articleSep 30, 2015 | 2 min. read

    A Farewell Ode to ICD-9

    As the hours count down It’s hard to believe That we’ve finally made it To ICD-10 Eve Our journey to get here Hasn’t been without strife As the US has clung To ICD-9 for dear life Letting go can be hard And change can be tough But in the modern medical world ICD-9 just isn’t enough Unlike a fine wine That gets better with time ICD-9 has aged poorly— It’s way past its prime Sure, we’ll always …

  • One ICD-10 FAQ to Rule Them All Image

    downloadNov 25, 2015

    One ICD-10 FAQ to Rule Them All

    The transition to ICD-10 was an unexpected journey for many healthcare providers—and making the switch was no easy quest. That’s why we traveled far over the Misty Mountains cold—and to dungeons deep and caverns old—to gather the answers to your most frequently asked ICD-10 questions.   Now, it’s time to head to the Shire, eat second breakfast, and make your coding concerns disappear. To go there (and back again), download the One ICD-10 FAQ to Rule Them …

  • What’s the Deal With External Cause Codes? Image

    articleApr 21, 2014 | 5 min. read

    What’s the Deal With External Cause Codes?

    Let’s face it: the ICD-10 code set isn’t exactly the most enticing reading material. So naturally, mainstream media coverage of ICD-10 has focused on some of the more, shall we say, entertaining features of the coding manual: namely, the external cause codes found in chapter 20. But while these supplementary codes certainly offer a dose of comic relief—and an endless supply of hilarious blog fodder (if we do say so ourselves)—they’ve also elicited more than a few …

  • Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum Image

    articleAug 18, 2018 | 34 min. read

    Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum

    Last week, WebPT’s trio of billing experts—Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, WebPT President and Co-founder; John Wallace, PT, MS, WebPT Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management; and Dianne Jewell, PT, DPT, PhD, WebPT Director of Clinical Practice, Outcomes, and Education—hosted a live open forum on physical therapy billing . Before the webinar, we challenged registrants to serve up their trickiest PT billing head-scratchers—and boy, did they deliver! We received literally hundreds of questions on …

  • Is Your Physical Therapy Software Ready for ICD-10? Image

    articleAug 25, 2015 | 6 min. read

    Is Your Physical Therapy Software Ready for ICD-10?

    At this point, the majority of physical therapy clinics are using some type of software to document, schedule, and bill for patient treatment. Thanks to ever-increasing compliance regulations, paper had to go the way of the VHS, becoming nearly obsolete. When your practice switched from paper to software, it was a big change. The process took time and training, and there undoubtedly was a period of adjustment. Now, you’re faced with another switch: ICD-10. And just as …

  • In a Multiple-Code State of Mind: Why One ICD-10 Code Might Not be Enough Image

    articleSep 17, 2015 | 6 min. read

    In a Multiple-Code State of Mind: Why One ICD-10 Code Might Not be Enough

    You’ve probably heard the saying, “A picture is worth a thousand words.” The same logic applies to ICD-10 coding—albeit in a less extreme manner. While you probably won’t need a thousand ICD-10 codes to paint a complete picture of a patient’s diagnosis, there’s a good chance you’ll need more than one—and for many rehab therapists, that represents a huge departure from the coding status quo. With that in mind, here are a few tips for using a …

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part 4 Image

    articleNov 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part 4

    Like the many Land Before Time sequels, the versions of our ICD-10 FAQ keep on-a-comin’. But—unlike those beloved dinosaur tales—I don’t anticipate 12 more versions (plus a TV series) will be necessary to cover what’s to come with ICD-10. Still, the questions continue to roll in—albeit a bit slower than they did a couple of months ago. However, most of the inquiries we’ve received in recent weeks have been super specific. That’s why, our most recent webinar—the …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.