In the face of the impending ICD-10 implementation, you might be afraid of getting lost in the mire of new codes, left to wander the metaphorical sewers as you scavenge for whatever relevant codes you can find. And when October 1 rolls around, you very well could stumble upon a shattered glass jar and four baby turtles, and—wait a second; this sounds a lot like the plot of a ’90s movie about life-sized teenage reptiles.

Even though ICD-10’s history is tumultuous—not unlike an action movie plot—the truth is that ICD-10 implementation is far from mutant ninja fiction. You might find the complexity of the new coding system daunting; but don’t worry, you’re not alone. Even Master Splinter himself would probably grimace at the thought of taking on this challenge. But here’s the good news: it doesn’t have to be painful. With a set process in place, determining the most accurate ICD-10 code—no matter the situation—can become as second-nature as ordering your favorite deep-dish pizza. All kidding aside, here are three simple steps to determine the right diagnosis code, as adapted from this article:

The State of Rehab Therapy in 2018 Guide - Regular BannerThe State of Rehab Therapy in 2018 Guide - Small Banner

1. Cowabunga, Index!

To narrow down your ICD-10 code options for a particular diagnosis, start by looking up the main term in the alphabetic index. Once you’ve chosen the most relevant main term, find sub-terms to help you boil down your diagnosis even further. To make sure you consider all possibilities, look for additional cues in the instructional notes (e.g., “see,” “see also,” “with,”"without,” “due to,” and “code by site”).  

2. Totally Tabular

After you find the main term in the alphabetic index, you might land on a very general version of the code. Such codes typically include labels like “unspecified,” and most of them feature only three or four alphanumeric characters. In some cases, these codes are the most accurate codes available; in others, you might have to keep digging. To be sure you find the most specific code possible, verify the code within the tabular list, which:

  • Organizes the codes by disease and injury.
  • Accounts for severity.
  • Includes all possible coding options for each condition (these codes may contain anywhere from three to seven characters).
  • Denotes any applicable exclusions—which indicate when codes can or cannot be used together—for each block of codes. Here, CMS covers the two types of exclusion instructions:
    • “Excludes1: It means ‘NOT CODED HERE!’ An Excludes1 note indicates that the code excluded should never be used at the same time as the code above the Excludes1 note.”
    • “Excludes2: A type 2 excludes note represents ‘Not included here.’ An excludes2 note indicates that the condition excluded is not part of the condition it is excluded from but a patient may have both conditions at the same time. When an Excludes2 note appears under a code it is acceptable to use both the code and the excluded code together.”

Pay close attention to these types of instructions as you peruse the tabular index, because they often contain guidance that is key to pinpointing the most detailed, accurate, and complete diagnosis code available.

3. Mega Guideline Guidance

Think you’ve boiled down your code to the most specific version? Bodacious! Now, on to the final step: reviewing the ICD-10 manual for chapter-specific coding guidelines. At the beginning of each chapter, you’ll find notes with additional instructions related to that group of codes—for example, whether you need to consider reporting any supplementary codes such as external cause codes. In addition to these notes, the manual includes important sequencing order guidelines. Depending on the condition you’re treating—and its related causation—the sequencing order of the codes will vary. Additionally, you should review this CDC document that covers “conventions, general coding guidelines, and chapter specific guidelines.”

If you follow these three steps, you’ll reduce your chances of encountering coding errors. And after some practice, you might even find yourself a master in your own right—able to code W59.22XA, “struck by turtle, initial encounter,” faster than you can say, “Pepperoni, please!”

  • What’s the Deal With External Cause Codes? Image

    articleApr 21, 2014 | 5 min. read

    What’s the Deal With External Cause Codes?

    Let’s face it: the ICD-10 code set isn’t exactly the most enticing reading material. So naturally, mainstream media coverage of ICD-10 has focused on some of the more, shall we say, entertaining features of the coding manual: namely, the external cause codes found in chapter 20. But while these supplementary codes certainly offer a dose of comic relief—and an endless supply of hilarious blog fodder (if we do say so ourselves)—they’ve also elicited more than a few …

  • Is Your Physical Therapy Software Ready for ICD-10? Image

    articleAug 25, 2015 | 6 min. read

    Is Your Physical Therapy Software Ready for ICD-10?

    At this point, the majority of physical therapy clinics are using some type of software to document, schedule, and bill for patient treatment. Thanks to ever-increasing compliance regulations, paper had to go the way of the VHS, becoming nearly obsolete. When your practice switched from paper to software, it was a big change. The process took time and training, and there undoubtedly was a period of adjustment. Now, you’re faced with another switch: ICD-10. And just as …

  • How to Select the Right ICD-10 Code in Three Easy Steps Image

    articleApr 16, 2014 | 3 min. read

    How to Select the Right ICD-10 Code in Three Easy Steps

    Earlier this month, we showed you how to find the correct ICD-10 equivalent of an ICD-9 code ; discussed tips for coding pain and injuries ; and provided you with a list of common therapy-specific codes . Now, let’s talk about how to navigate the alphanumeric coding labyrinth known as ICD-10 from patient diagnosis to final code submission. With more than 68,000 codes to wade through, identifying the correct (read: most specific) one might seem a bit …

  • In a Multiple-Code State of Mind: Why One ICD-10 Code Might Not be Enough Image

    articleSep 17, 2015 | 6 min. read

    In a Multiple-Code State of Mind: Why One ICD-10 Code Might Not be Enough

    You’ve probably heard the saying, “A picture is worth a thousand words.” The same logic applies to ICD-10 coding—albeit in a less extreme manner. While you probably won’t need a thousand ICD-10 codes to paint a complete picture of a patient’s diagnosis, there’s a good chance you’ll need more than one—and for many rehab therapists, that represents a huge departure from the coding status quo. With that in mind, here are a few tips for using a …

  • ICD-10 FAQ Part 4 Image

    articleNov 3, 2015 | 5 min. read

    ICD-10 FAQ Part 4

    Like the many Land Before Time sequels, the versions of our ICD-10 FAQ keep on-a-comin’. But—unlike those beloved dinosaur tales—I don’t anticipate 12 more versions (plus a TV series) will be necessary to cover what’s to come with ICD-10. Still, the questions continue to roll in—albeit a bit slower than they did a couple of months ago. However, most of the inquiries we’ve received in recent weeks have been super specific. That’s why, our most recent webinar—the …

  • The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux Image

    articleSep 24, 2015 | 16 min. read

    The Ultimate ICD-10 FAQ: Part Deux

    Just when we thought we’d gotten every ICD-10 question under the sun, we got, well, more questions. Like, a lot more. But, we take that as a good sign, because like a scrappy reporter trying to get to the bottom of a big story, our audience of blog readers and webinar attendees aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions—which means they’re serious about preparing themselves for the changes ahead. And we’re equally serious about providing them with …

  • Last Legs: The Compliance Vulnerabilities of Dead or Dying Software Image

    articleOct 24, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Last Legs: The Compliance Vulnerabilities of Dead or Dying Software

    Rusty mechanical equipment. Creaky carnival rides. Wobbly chairs. People are naturally skeptical of things that are dilapidated, rundown, or slipshod—and with good reason. After all, that which is ramshackle usually isn’t reliable. Now, imagine it’s the physical therapy software you use everyday to run your rehab therapy practice that’s gone derelict. Take PTOS EMR, for example , because if you didn’t know, this therapy office software is going out of business, and it has ceased all updates …

  • The Case for Coders Image

    articleFeb 23, 2015 | 3 min. read

    The Case for Coders

    As the ICD-10 saga unfolds, providers and other stakeholders inevitably will find that the new codes are far more specific than ICD-9 . And because of that specificity, simple mistakes could lead to reimbursement delays and claim denials. To get ahead of the game and prevent denials, you’ll need some type of quality control to keep those tiny—but potentially costly—errors from occurring. One way to do that? Hire an outside expert: an ICD-10-trained medical coder. Decoding Coders …

  • Costly ICD-10 Traps and How to Avoid Them Image

    articleAug 26, 2015 | 5 min. read

    Costly ICD-10 Traps and How to Avoid Them

    Imagine you’re playing a game . More specifically: an ICD-10 Rube Goldberg-style game . To win, you have to scurry through a series of stages without getting caught in costly traps. But what happens when you find yourself at the mercy of the swiftly-turning plastic crank? Before you know it, the cage has lowered and you’re out of the game —forever separated from your cheddar. Okay, so ICD-10 isn’t a game of zany action on a crazy …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.