Medicare rejected my claimSo, you submitted a claim lacking functional limitation reporting to Medicare after July 1. Uh oh. By now, you’ve probably received a polite rejection letter telling you that Medicare will not be providing you with reimbursement for your services—and neither will the beneficiary.

What’s a PT, OT, or SLP to do? Well, unless you actually completed a full functional limitation assessment during your patient’s evaluative visit and simply forgot to include the corresponding G-codes and severity modifiers, the answer is: nothing. Unfortunately, going back now and changing anything on your documentation to ensure payment is a very, very bad idea. Just ask compliance expert Tom Ambury, who points out that the Federal Government has won several recent court cases against providers who created inaccurate or unjustifiable documentation—even on accident. Here’s what Ambury has to say about one such case in his latest Compliance Chat:

“A U.S. Court of Appeals decision recently upheld the conviction of a provider who had documented inaccurately in the medical record. The provider was found guilty of making false statements relating to health care matters, even though Medicare never reviewed the documentation. The provider testified that they were extremely busy and sometimes waited weeks or even months to complete the documentation, which ended up containing inaccurate information.”

Ambury also writes: “It appears from the decision that the False Medical Record statute does not require for there to be a specific intent on the part of the creator of the medical record to deceive or mislead. The information in the medical record just needs to be inaccurate. Conviction under the False Medical Record Statute carries penalties of up to five years in prison”—with substantial fines on top of that.

Let’s face it: There’s no way that going back and changing your documentation is worth the risk. Instead, on your patient’s next visit—regardless of the visit type—complete and submit functional limitation reporting, and you’ll be back on track—albeit a little short on overall reimbursements. This might feel like a hard pill to swallow, but it certainly beats facing an audit, trial, and possible jail time. “Let’s learn our lessons as we go, lick our wounds as we need to, and keep moving forward. After all,” Ambury says. “Our industry is constantly changing and these are life-long learning lessons.”

Now, if you did in fact identify your patient’s primary functional limitation, complete an outcome measurement tool, and document appropriately during the episode of care, you can create an addendum containing the missing G-codes and severity modifiers and resubmit. However, adding an addendum could create red flags for Medicare—so be very sure that your documentation is in tip-top, super-defensible shape. If you're not confident in adding an addendum, inquire with your local MAC or a compliance consultant on what steps you should take from here.

In the spirit of moving forward, I’ll leave you with a few more pieces of advice from WebPT and Tom Ambury. To ensure you always receive appropriate reimbursement:

  1. Document well during the episode of care.
  2. Complete periodic internal documentation audits to ensure defensibility.
  3. File your claims in a timely manner.
  4. Stay up to date on the latest in reporting regulations and legislation.
  5. Seek out a reputable source for compliance information and ask a lot of questions.

Have you received a rejection letter? How did you handle it? What advice do you have for fellow therapists? Leave your thoughts in the comment section below.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner
  • The Complete PT Billing FAQ Image

    articleMay 24, 2016 | 25 min. read

    The Complete PT Billing FAQ

    Over the years, WebPT has a hosted a slew of billing webinars and published dozens of billing-related blog posts. And in that time, we’ve received our fair share of tricky questions. Now, in an effort to satisfy your curiosity, we’ve compiled all of our most common brain-busters into one epic FAQ. Don’t see your question? Ask it in the comments below. Questions related to: • WebPT • Modifier 59 • Other Modifiers • Coding • ICD-10 • …

  • Who You Gonna Call? Which Compliance Resource to Contact and When Image

    articleOct 10, 2016 | 6 min. read

    Who You Gonna Call? Which Compliance Resource to Contact and When

    As is the case for healthcare professionals across the care spectrum, compliance resources for physical therapists are constantly evolving—forcing you, the rehab and remediation specialist, to wear many hats. Not only are you treating patient impairment and injury on a day-to-day basis, but you’re also responsible for ensuring that you and your practice meet a slew of ever-changing regulatory requirements . Man—and you thought finding treatment slots for your growing Rolodex of patients was a challenge. Don’t …

  • articleMar 20, 2013 | 5 min. read

    “What Box Does my G-Code Go Into?”: Responding to Outdated Questions Related to Paper Billing Claims

    Today’s blog comes from WebPT’s Billing Onboarding & Operations Manager Stacey Abelman. Thanks Stacey!   Members often ask: where does my G-code go? Or what box does my NPI go into? Additionally, we—as the WebPT Billing Service—receive such requests as “I need my facility address changed in Box 32” or “I need to use my Tax ID instead of my SSN in box 24j.” But these “boxes” that Members sometimes refer to don't exist anymore in modern …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1 Image

    articleJul 29, 2014 | 6 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1

    Today’s blog post comes from WebPT writers Brooke Andrus and Erica Cohen. If a patient has more than one functional limitation associated with a single diagnosis, should I report G-codes and severity modifiers for all of them? No. Medicare will only accept functional limitation reporting (FLR) data for one primary functional limitation per case. Therefore, if the patient has multiple functional limitations associated with a single diagnosis, you'll need to determine which one represents the patient's primary …

  • PQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know Image

    webinarNov 4, 2015

    PQRS 2016: Everything PTs, OTs, and SLPs Need to Know

    At this point, you’d think satisfying PQRS requirements would be child’s play, but unfortunately, Medicare changes the rules every year. Fortunately, we’ve already combed through the 2016 Final Rule for you and organized everything you need to know about PQRS into a jam-packed, super educational 60-minute webinar. Join us for this beneficial seminar, where hosts Heidi Jannenga and Charlotte Bohnett will: detail 2016 reporting requirements; describe the different reporting methods; and explain how to ensure you successfully …

  • What’s Your ICD-10 IQ? [Edit] Image

    articleAug 10, 2015 | 1 min. read

    What’s Your ICD-10 IQ? [Edit]

    For months, we’ve gone on and on about ICD-10 testing: testing your coding processes, testing your software, and testing with your payers. Now, with under two months to go before the transition date, it’s time to test one more very important factor: yourself. After all, no matter how sophisticated your systems and software are, critical thinking—and more importantly, clinical judgment—will make or break your ICD-10 success.   Think you’re an ICD-10 Einstein? Take our quiz to prove …

  • A Tale of Two Billing Blunders: Overbilling and Misbilling Image

    articleJul 23, 2015 | 6 min. read

    A Tale of Two Billing Blunders: Overbilling and Misbilling

    Billing for physical therapy services is tricky, time-consuming, and nerve-wracking. After all, there are so many rules to follow, and it seems like those rules are constantly changing. That makes mistakes tough to avoid. And in many cases, you might not even know you’re making them. And while an occasional billing error probably isn’t a huge deal, if you’re unknowingly messing up left and right, you could end up in hot water. And if you’re purposely messing …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2 Image

    articleJul 30, 2014 | 4 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2

    I heard that some private insurance carriers are now requiring functional limitation reporting. Is this true? Some non-Medicare insurers do require functional limitation reporting (e.g., Texas Workers' Compensation). Check out this blog post to see a list of the ones we know about right now. Keep in mind, however, that this list is ever-changing—so if you’re unsure of whether a particular plan requires FLR, be sure to inquire directly with the carrier. If I did not submit …

  • The 8-Minute Rule Showdown: Medicare vs. AMA Image

    articleNov 25, 2015 | 5 min. read

    The 8-Minute Rule Showdown: Medicare vs. AMA

    The guidelines for using the 8-Minute Rule are kind of like the instructions for building a piece of furniture from IKEA: they appear simple at first, but before you know it, you’ve been struggling for hours, you’ve got a lopsided futon, and there are seven leftover screws of various shapes and sizes scattered around your living room floor (maybe they’re just extras, right?). To make matters even more confusing, not all payers adhere to the same set …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.