Gaming the System and Other FLR No-NosWe all know that functional limitation reporting (FLR)  means (a little) more work for (basically) the same reward. And that can be a hard pill to swallow for many therapists who are already stretched thin as a result of increasing caseloads and increasingly stringent documentation requirements. Even so, taking the easy road—the low road—and gaming the system—and thus, this profession—is not the answer. It never is. This—just like everything else you do for your patients, your practice, and your profession—is a matter of pride. So make your reporting something to be proud of—it’s a testament to who you are as an individual and as a therapist.

Over the last several months, we’ve come across more than a few concerning questions from the community regarding ways to get around functional limitation reporting. Today, we thought we’d address two of them: crosswalking scores from objective measurement tools to severity modifiers and misrepresenting patient progress.

Crosswalking Scores

To satisfy functional limitation reporting requirements, therapists must assign a severity modifier to their patient’s current (or discharge) status G-code as well as their projected goal status G-code. These severity modifiers communicate where a patient is currently in terms of functional limitation and where he or she should be after treatment (i.e., long term functional goal).

To determine which severity modifier is appropriate, therapists must use a combination of an evidence-based outcome measurement tool (OMT) as well as their clinical judgment. Crosswalking the score directly from the OMT to the severity modifier without taking into consideration additional clinical factors leaves out a very large piece of the patient’s diagnosis and treatment puzzle—context. And that comes from the clinical and highly skilled judgment of the therapist. Taking professional opinion out of the equation is telling the world that therapists aren’t all that necessary—and that a simple computer algorithm can do the same job. And we all know that’s not the case. You’re the professional—the expert. Your opinion matters—as does the patient’s story.

Misrepresenting Patient Progress

The purpose of functional limitation reporting requirements—at this point—is for Medicare to collect data on their beneficiaries’ collective progress in therapy and standard treatment practices in therapy clinics. No one is expecting every patient on every visit to achieve earth-shattering progress. Therapy doesn't work that way. And by providing Medicare with false, inflated information on your patient’s progress, you may actually skew their understanding of realistic therapy expectations and goals. That’s not what anyone wants—that’s certainly not going to benefit our industry or our patients. So be honest. It’s completely reasonable for you to not change the severity modifier on every patient’s progress note—not because you didn’t evaluate them, but because perhaps their progress remained in the 20 percentage points between the low and high range of that modifier. And you know what? Eighteen percent progress is still pretty darn great in a lot of patients. And if you didn’t meet your goal—or something changes mid-treatment that leads you to reassess what’s realistic for your patient—that’s okay, too. Just make sure you’re documenting clearly the reasons why you’re making the decisions you are both in treatment plan development and in goal selection.

As Heidi pointed out in this month’s WebPT founder letter, FLR actually represents a real opportunity for therapists to improve their standing in the eyes of the medical industry—an opportunity not to be taken lightly or gamed.

“This reporting affords us the opportunity to demonstrate our expertise and relevancy—and get paid for it. You are essentially already completing these things every day in your clinical practice—now you just have to document it. So get fired up. We need to prove ourselves, and prove ourselves we will.”

With this in mind, let’s all get a little fired up. Not about how to get out of FLR but about doing it right.  

Medicare Open Forum - Regular BannerMedicare Open Forum - Small Banner
  • Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum Image

    articleAug 18, 2018 | 34 min. read

    Common Questions from Our PT Billing Open Forum

    Last week, WebPT’s trio of billing experts—Dr. Heidi Jannenga, PT, DPT, ATC/L, WebPT President and Co-founder; John Wallace, PT, MS, WebPT Chief Business Development Officer of Revenue Cycle Management; and Dianne Jewell, PT, DPT, PhD, WebPT Director of Clinical Practice, Outcomes, and Education—hosted a live open forum on physical therapy billing . Before the webinar, we challenged registrants to serve up their trickiest PT billing head-scratchers—and boy, did they deliver! We received literally hundreds of questions on …

  • The Basics of Functional Limitation Reporting Image

    articleMay 2, 2013 | 3 min. read

    The Basics of Functional Limitation Reporting

    Beginning July 1, 2013, CMS is requiring that you complete functional limitation reporting (FLR) on Medicare part B patients in order to receive reimbursement for your services. While WebPT can monumentally help with this task through our soon-to-be-released integrated functional limitation reporting feature, it’s important that you still understand FLR thoroughly, especially because clinical judgment does play a large role in its completion. So, with that in mind, let’s tackle the basics of FLR. Why functional limitation …

  • How to Complete Functional Limitation Reporting in WebPT Image

    articleFeb 19, 2014 | 4 min. read

    How to Complete Functional Limitation Reporting in WebPT

    As of July 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires that therapists complete functional limitation reporting (FLR)—through the use of  G-codes and severity modifiers —on all eligible Medicare Part B patients at the initial evaluation, re-evaluation if applicable, every progress note (minimum of every ten visits), and discharge in order to receive reimbursement for their services. Today, several other private insurance companies also require FLR data as a condition of reimbursement. Good thing …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1 Image

    articleJul 29, 2014 | 6 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1

    Today’s blog post comes from WebPT writers Brooke Andrus and Erica Cohen. If a patient has more than one functional limitation associated with a single diagnosis, should I report G-codes and severity modifiers for all of them? No. Medicare will only accept functional limitation reporting (FLR) data for one primary functional limitation per case. Therefore, if the patient has multiple functional limitations associated with a single diagnosis, you'll need to determine which one represents the patient's primary …

  • Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. What You Need to Know About the New G-Codes. Image

    articleAug 20, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. What You Need to Know About the New G-Codes.

    Like the ’90s hip-hop-themed title of this blog post implies, Functional Limitation Reporting G-codes may be new, but they’re nothing to fret over. Essentially, effective July 1, 2013, CMS began requiring therapists to report new G-codes in an effort to further emphasize function and functional progress in therapy treatment. But the good news is that you should already be assessing—and documenting—functional progress as part of your short- and long-term goal setting at the initial evaluation, tenth visit …

  • webinarMay 21, 2013

    Get Ready for Functional Limitation Reporting

    Beginning July 1, 2013, CMS is requiring that you complete functional limitation reporting (FLR) on all Medicare patients in order to receive reimbursement for your services. We know you want to get paid. That’s why it’s crucial you have functional limitation reporting down pat. With that in mind, WebPT will host a special webinar on May 20 to help you get fully prepared for FLR. In this 60-minute session, hosts Heidi Jannenga and Mike Manheimer will explain …

  • Functional Outcome Measures Image

    articleNov 28, 2012 | 5 min. read

    Functional Outcome Measures

    Today's post comes from Tom Ambury, PT and compliance officer at  PT Compliance Group , based off this month’s “Compliance Chat” blog post . By now, I hope most of you are using functional outcome measures. If you haven’t started yet, you might want to consider taking the next few weeks to get prepared and begin the process in January of 2013. Why? Let’s start with the fact that physical therapy documentation is coming under greater scrutiny …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2 Image

    articleJul 30, 2014 | 4 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2

    I heard that some private insurance carriers are now requiring functional limitation reporting. Is this true? Some non-Medicare insurers do require functional limitation reporting (e.g., Texas Workers' Compensation). Check out this blog post to see a list of the ones we know about right now. Keep in mind, however, that this list is ever-changing—so if you’re unsure of whether a particular plan requires FLR, be sure to inquire directly with the carrier. If I did not submit …

  • Back to Basics: Functional Limitation Reporting G-Codes Image

    articleFeb 11, 2013 | 7 min. read

    Back to Basics: Functional Limitation Reporting G-Codes

    We’ve covered the ins and outs of G-codes as well as how it easy it will be to implement them successfully within WebPT —and why an integrated functional limitation reporting solution is the best solution . Today let’s go back to the G-code basics. What’s a G-code? Effective July 1, 2013, CMS will require therapists to complete functional limitation reporting through the use of new G-codes and corresponding severity modifiers for all eligible Medicare patients at the …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.