“I’m going to physical therapy.” Whenever anyone—a friend, a colleague, or even a family member—says this to me, I feel a twinge of disappointment. I know, it sounds crazy coming from me; I am a physical therapist, after all. But that is precisely the reason behind my discontent: I am a physical therapist—a doctorate-level medical professional with the skills and education necessary to diagnose, treat, and coordinate care for my patients. I am not some nameless, faceless provider of a generic ancillary form of treatment known as “physical therapy”; furthermore, the treatment I, as an individual therapist, provide to my patients is a reflection of my unique education, expertise, knowledge, experience, and talent. It is not a mass-producible service.

And yet, when a patient—a healthcare consumer—says he or she is “going to physical therapy,” that is exactly what this entire profession is reduced to: a service. I don’t think I fully grasped the significance behind this seemingly inconsequential choice of phrasing until I attended the Graham Sessions a couple of years ago. There, a fellow attendee pointed out that when physical therapy patients discuss their treatment, they overwhelmingly tend to emphasize the “what” rather than the “who”—that is, they’ll talk about “going to physical therapy” rather than “going to the physical therapist.”

It might not seem like a big deal, but it points to a much larger issue. After all, when someone talks about “going to the dentist” or “going to the doctor” or even—brace for it—“going to the chiropractor,” they are unconsciously linking the value of the service they receive to the person providing it. But, when a person says he or she is “going to physical therapy,” the value shifts to being associated with the service itself—and I am baffled as to why, in the healthcare world, that association seems exclusive to the physical therapy space. You would never hear anyone talk about “going to dentistry” or “going to medicine” or “going to chiropractic.”

It’s hard to pinpoint exactly how—or when—this semantic division developed. But, I’m betting it has a lot to do with the fact that physical therapy came into existence as an extension of physician care—in other words, physicians sent patients to therapy and provided therapists with detailed treatment prescriptions. Thus, the value inherent to clinical expertise has always rested with the referring physician—and the therapist was merely a tool for furnishing the prescribed services. However, as the physical therapy profession evolved, and therapists became better-educated—and more autonomous—providers, the perceived relationship between physicians and therapists remained the same.

On top of all that, not only have we been beholden to a payment system that does not reward quality, but we’ve also—as a community—resisted efforts to introduce quality (i.e., value) as a condition of payment. Thus, our payers have continued to see us as a cost to be reduced, rather than a valuable care option to be leveraged. And until we (1) start operating under a payment system that accounts for value and (2) take control of the data and data-collection tools we use to communicate that value, insurance companies will continue to look for ways to slash our payments. After all, in their eyes, our services are nothing more than a product—and like anyone purchasing a product, they want to pay the lowest price possible.

But, we know better. We know we are not a service; we are not a product; and we certainly are not a commodity. In fact, in cases involving neuromuscular issues, our clinical expertise matches—and often, far exceeds—that of our physician colleagues. And when patients with those issues come to us first, we are not only capable of developing and executing effective care plans, but we also have the ability to do so in a less invasive—and less expensive—manner than most other types of providers. Essentially, we produce better outcomes at a lower cost—and isn’t that the very definition of valuable care?

The problem, of course, is that we haven’t proven that value—at least not at scale. Instead, we’ve:

  • kept our outcomes and care cost data in siloes;
  • used proprietary tools to track outcomes, thus rendering it meaningless outside of rehab; or
  • neglected to track patient outcomes altogether.

There’s no way around it: to prove our value as crucial members of patient care teams—and to shatter the long-held misconception that physical therapy is nothing more than a commodity delivered independent of clinical expertise—we must unite in our outcomes data-collection efforts. Even the practice owners who have implemented outcomes-tracking programs in their clinics often complain that their data holds little influence over insurance behemoths—and that’s simply because, in many cases, big payers want to see big data. More than that—they want to see data they can easily understand, analyze, and compare across the healthcare continuum. That means it’s imperative that we standardize the process through which we collect outcomes data—including the set of tools we use.

So, how do we begin amassing that data? How do we get a large enough portion of the therapy community on the same page with regard to outcomes tracking? Well, it starts with getting the word out—which is precisely why I’ve been so prolific in my outcomes-focused content efforts. I have been beating this drum for quite a while now—and you can rest assured that until the rehab therapy community has established an effective, coordinated outcomes-tracking strategy, that beat will go on.

Whether we like it or not, the era of value-driven health care is upon us. And that means that, like all other healthcare providers, rehab therapists can no longer afford to accept the false presumption that their value is rooted in their interventions. Because as we all know, truly valuable care encompasses so much more than the treatment itself: it’s about how and when the treatment is delivered, the patient’s overall experience in receiving it, and, most importantly, the person providing it.

So, are you with me? Will you join the movement to end the commoditization of our profession? I hope so—because with all hands on deck, I truly believe we’ll see the day when “I’m going to physical therapy” vanishes from our patients’ vernacular, and “I’m going to see my physical therapist” takes its place.

WebPT Outcomes - Regular BannerWebPT Outcomes - Small Banner
  • Founder Letter: Why Data is Only One Part of the Value Story Image

    articleMar 9, 2016 | 7 min. read

    Founder Letter: Why Data is Only One Part of the Value Story

    Over the past several months, I’ve talked a lot about how therapists can prove their value (namely, through tracking outcomes data ). But, even though data provides the value proof we need, it’s not the end of the story. It’s up to us to turn that data into something meaningful—something we can act on that will actually help us demonstrate the value of our care. And that means using data in conjunction with defensible documentation to inform …

  • Founder Letter: Why I’m Betting on Outcomes Image

    articleFeb 4, 2016 | 5 min. read

    Founder Letter: Why I’m Betting on Outcomes

    I’m not much of a gambler. Some folks enjoy the rush that comes with putting all their chips on the table and risking everything on a single roll of the dice. Well, no offense to all you card sharks out there, but if I’m going to go all in, it better be on something I’m pretty darn sure of. So, when I say I’m betting on outcomes, you know I’m not bluffing. In fact, I’m 100% confident …

  • Breaking Bad Habits: The Modern PT’s Formula for Success Image

    webinarJun 7, 2016

    Breaking Bad Habits: The Modern PT’s Formula for Success

    Since the dawn of rehab therapy, PTs have been operating in a system of restriction. In some cases, that’s a good thing—after all, therapists pride themselves in treating and healing their patients within the confines of evidence-based practice. But in many ways, the traditional system is broken—and that’s only growing more apparent as we enter a new age of health care: the era of value-based care delivery. For too long, rehab therapists have left it up to …

  • Why You Shouldn't Track Outcomes in Isolation Image

    articleFeb 29, 2016 | 3 min. read

    Why You Shouldn't Track Outcomes in Isolation

    Outcomes has been a popular topic of conversation lately; as health care drifts further away from a volume-based payment environment, proving the value of your treatment will become essential to getting paid. According to this article on PhysicalTherapist.com, as provider incentives begin to change, your “strategy and behavior must change as well.” Tracking outcomes is a giant leap for rehab therapists—but if you’re tracking outcomes at your clinic only, then Houston, we have a problem. To make …

  • Our Comfort Zone is Killing Us: Top Takeaways from the 2018 Graham Sessions Image

    articleJan 17, 2018 | 15 min. read

    Our Comfort Zone is Killing Us: Top Takeaways from the 2018 Graham Sessions

    Most of the time, when I attend a conference—whether that be a physical therapy, healthcare technology, business, or leadership conference—I do so because I want to connect with, and learn from, others in my field. I want to take in and absorb their knowledge to supplement and expand the depth of my own expertise. And most of the conferences I attend—including the Graham Sessions —allow me to do just that. But, this year’s Graham Sessions were different. …

  • PT v Outcomes: Dawn of Value Image

    articleMar 22, 2016 | 4 min. read

    PT v Outcomes: Dawn of Value

    Most superhero sagas revolve around a classic battle of good versus evil. The good guy—our hero—swoops in to save the day, rescuing everyone from whatever horrible deed the baddie was planning. But sometimes, a story needs two heroes to get the job done. While Batman and Superman are awesome—seriously, we love superheroes—in our world, the real superheroes are physical therapists. They may not wear capes or masks, but every day, PTs across the globe wield their extraordinary …

  • WebPT Member Q&A: Why PTs Absolutely Must Track Outcomes Image

    articleFeb 27, 2017 | 7 min. read

    WebPT Member Q&A: Why PTs Absolutely Must Track Outcomes

    Brian Rodriguez, PT, DPT, OCS, is the owner of Utah Physical Therapy Specialists in West Jordan, Utah. There, he treats a variety of orthopedic conditions, specializing in sports injuries, spine problems, headaches, auto accident cases, geriatric problems, and work injuries. A WebPT Member since 2012, Brian’s clinic was one of the first to put WebPT Outcomes to work. In this interview-style post, Brian provides his two-cents on the importance of outcomes tracking , explains how he built …

  • Think Big, Think Differently: 6 Bits of Inspiration from Ascend 2017 Image

    articleOct 5, 2017 | 11 min. read

    Think Big, Think Differently: 6 Bits of Inspiration from Ascend 2017

    The overarching theme of Ascend 2017 —the fourth-annual installment of rehab therapy’s premier business summit—was, quite simply, “Think big.” But, based on what we learned from our esteemed group of speakers over the course of two inspiration-filled days in Washington, DC, a more accurate tagline for this year’s conference might have been, “Think differently.” After all, in a field as complex as health care, grand aspirations are not enough. To solve the problems plaguing this industry, we …

  • Outcomes and OMT FAQ Image

    articleApr 26, 2016 | 11 min. read

    Outcomes and OMT FAQ

    In January, we hosted a webinar focused on the importance of outcomes tracking in physical therapy. In addition to explaining why it’s absolutely critical that therapists collect objective data on patient progress, we highlighted a few of the reports available in WebPT Outcomes . With the move to a value-based payment environment already in full swing, outcomes tracking is a hot topic in the physical therapy space, and that meant lots of thoughtful question from our webinar …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.