Today's blog post comes from WebPT Co-Founder Heidi Jannenga, PT, MPT, ATC/L.

By now, I’m sure you’ve heard about functional limitation reporting—also known as claims-based outcome reporting (CBOR) and G-code reporting. Regardless of what your clinic calls it, functional limitation reporting is coming quickly. In fact, as of July 1, 2013, CMS is making it mandatory. That means they won’t pay you for your services if you don’t properly report functional limitations via specific G-codes on the claim form for each eligible Medicare patient. Now, if you’re a WebPT Member, we got you covered. In mid-spring, we’re integrating functional limitation reporting (G-codes and corresponding severity modifiers) into your documentation workflow, which will make it a breeze to stay compliant—and thus, get paid.

Last month we covered functional limitation reporting basics in several blog posts, a webinar, and an article on Physiospot, but in the midst of all this—and especially at CSM 2013—I’ve realized that in addition to understanding functional limitation reporting inside and out, we need to understand its importance beyond getting paid. While overall the transition to functional limitation reporting is a good thing, it may actually fall short in terms of bringing our profession closer to achieving evidence-based practice on the whole. Why, you ask?

The Good

Functional limitation reporting will allow us to gain tremendous insight into our patients’ and our peers’ patients’ functional outcomes. Just think of what all that data could show based on treatment type and patient demographics, and that goes for us as individual providers and for us as an industry. This is our chance to prove unequivocally that rehab therapy works—and to see which techniques work best. We’re clearly moving towards a pay-for-performance reimbursement structure, and this is an ideal way to demonstrate our patients’ progress with our care. Additionally, this reporting requirement will make us better therapists by insisting that we treat function and not just objective measures. 

The Opportunities

Because this requirement is more heavily focused on the subjective—what the patient thinks and feels—questions remain as to whether it may actually weaken our evidenced-based practice efforts. As an industry, we’ve fully researched and vetted many functional outcome measurement tools as reliable and valid tests. However, they are still based on the subjective complaints of the patient vs. objective measures taken by the therapist. Ultimately, it appears Medicare’s stance is that what the patient thinks and feels is what really matters—which in my opinion is accurate. But it doesn’t appear that Medicare really cares what method or treatment procedures we use to achieve patient improvement—just do it and do it as quickly as possible. This does not promote nor advocate for true evidence-based practice. It’s just by any means necessary.

Go Forward

In the end, though, we can’t let Medicare’s apathetic vibe influence our behavior and practice. While we need to understand and acknowledge the opportunities, it shouldn’t be what we focus on. Let’s hone in on the good. During CSM 2013, in the Autonomy presentation, an attendee stood up and said: “Functional Limitation Reporting is good. It might be more paperwork [which with WebPT, it won’t], but it’ll prove our worth.” That’s the attitude I’m embracing, and I think we all should. We encourage our patients to think positive—no matter how difficult the process or how murky the waters ahead might be. We need to encourage ourselves to do the same.

The PT’s Guide to Billing - Regular BannerThe PT’s Guide to Billing - Small Banner
  • articleJan 3, 2013 | 2 min. read

    Now That I Know G-Codes Ain’t No Thang, How Do I Implement ‘Em?

    Last month, we discussed CMS’s new G-codes in a cleverly titled post, “ Ain’t Nothin’ But a G-Code, Baby. ” As the name implies, this new functional limitation reporting mandate is not nearly as daunting as you may think. In fact, if you use WebPT, it’s going to be as easy as pie—cherry pie, or maybe apple. Regardless, I digress. Here, we’ll discuss how with just a few clicks, and some clinical judgment, you can easily implement …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1 Image

    articleJul 29, 2014 | 6 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 1

    Today’s blog post comes from WebPT writers Brooke Andrus and Erica Cohen. If a patient has more than one functional limitation associated with a single diagnosis, should I report G-codes and severity modifiers for all of them? No. Medicare will only accept functional limitation reporting (FLR) data for one primary functional limitation per case. Therefore, if the patient has multiple functional limitations associated with a single diagnosis, you'll need to determine which one represents the patient's primary …

  • When to Report Discharge Codes with Functional Limitation Reporting Image

    articleMar 5, 2014 | 3 min. read

    When to Report Discharge Codes with Functional Limitation Reporting

    Lately, there’s been a bit of confusion surrounding Medicare’s requirements for submitting functional limitation reporting (FLR) discharge codes. Due to a “glitch” in the way Medicare processes claims containing FLR data, some therapists have received claim denials for cases involving tricky discharge reporting scenarios. So, we’ve put together a guide to address some common head-scratching situations. Read on to learn when you need to discharge and when you don’t. Patient Self-Discharges and Returns After 60 or More …

  • Back to Basics: Functional Limitation Reporting G-Codes Image

    articleFeb 11, 2013 | 7 min. read

    Back to Basics: Functional Limitation Reporting G-Codes

    We’ve covered the ins and outs of G-codes as well as how it easy it will be to implement them successfully within WebPT —and why an integrated functional limitation reporting solution is the best solution . Today let’s go back to the G-code basics. What’s a G-code? Effective July 1, 2013, CMS will require therapists to complete functional limitation reporting through the use of new G-codes and corresponding severity modifiers for all eligible Medicare patients at the …

  • Functional Outcome Measures Image

    articleNov 28, 2012 | 5 min. read

    Functional Outcome Measures

    Today's post comes from Tom Ambury, PT and compliance officer at  PT Compliance Group , based off this month’s “Compliance Chat” blog post . By now, I hope most of you are using functional outcome measures. If you haven’t started yet, you might want to consider taking the next few weeks to get prepared and begin the process in January of 2013. Why? Let’s start with the fact that physical therapy documentation is coming under greater scrutiny …

  • Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2 Image

    articleJul 30, 2014 | 4 min. read

    Common Questions from our G-Code Denials Webinar: Part 2

    I heard that some private insurance carriers are now requiring functional limitation reporting. Is this true? Some non-Medicare insurers do require functional limitation reporting (e.g., Texas Workers' Compensation). Check out this blog post to see a list of the ones we know about right now. Keep in mind, however, that this list is ever-changing—so if you’re unsure of whether a particular plan requires FLR, be sure to inquire directly with the carrier. If I did not submit …

  • webinarMay 21, 2013

    Get Ready for Functional Limitation Reporting

    Beginning July 1, 2013, CMS is requiring that you complete functional limitation reporting (FLR) on all Medicare patients in order to receive reimbursement for your services. We know you want to get paid. That’s why it’s crucial you have functional limitation reporting down pat. With that in mind, WebPT will host a special webinar on May 20 to help you get fully prepared for FLR. In this 60-minute session, hosts Heidi Jannenga and Mike Manheimer will explain …

  • articleJun 27, 2013 | 6 min. read

    Functional Limitation Reporting and You: What You Need to Know

    Wow, can July 1 really be right around the corner? Seems like yesterday we were only finding out about the requirement to document and report functional limitation G-codes and severity/complexity modifiers, and I think it really was only yesterday that CMS figured out how they would work. Let me start by making sure you understand that functional limitation reporting (FLR) and PQRS are separate and distinct programs and that each program has its own set of codes …

  • The Basics of Functional Limitation Reporting Image

    articleMay 2, 2013 | 3 min. read

    The Basics of Functional Limitation Reporting

    Beginning July 1, 2013, CMS is requiring that you complete functional limitation reporting (FLR) on Medicare part B patients in order to receive reimbursement for your services. While WebPT can monumentally help with this task through our soon-to-be-released integrated functional limitation reporting feature, it’s important that you still understand FLR thoroughly, especially because clinical judgment does play a large role in its completion. So, with that in mind, let’s tackle the basics of FLR. Why functional limitation …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.