Chuck FelderToday’s blog post comes from Chuck Felder, PT, DPT, SCS, MBA. For follow-up questions, please email Chuck at CFelder@HCSconsulting.com.

1.)    What?

In 2012, CMS began a process of reducing payment for therapy services based on multiple procedures performed during the same visit. This is termed the Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR).  Despite APTA’s and others best efforts to get this removed, CMS began a 20% reduction policy on the second and subsequent procedure each day. This is in effect for all therapy services provided on a single day. So, if the patient received OT on the same day as PT, CMS would pay the highest value procedure at 100% and reduce all subsequent procedures that day by 20% of the practice expense component. Overall, the average visit with around 3.7 units would have  its payment reduced about 6%–7%.  For the first quarter of 2013, CMS continued the 20% reduction policy.  However, they’ve since switched to a 50% reduction. 

2.)    When?

The changes took effect April 1, 2013, so expect to see smaller checks from Medicare. The 50% reduction in the practice expense is significant because the practice expense typically accounts for about half of the total payment for each code. 

One can determine Medicare allowed amounts by multiplying the conversion factor times the geographic pricing cost index (GPCI), then times the relative value unit (RVU) for each of the three components of “Work,” “Practice Expense,” and “Malpractice Expense.”  See the chart below for an example: 

Locality:

03102 00 Arizona

Conversion Factor:

 $34.023

Code:

97110

 

Work

PE

MP

 

GPCI

1.000

0.978

1.015

 

RVU

0.45

0.48

0.01

Total

Calculated Amount

$15.31

$15.97

$0.35

$31.63

48.4% 

50.5% 

1.1%

 

3.)    How Much?

The reductions are larger than you may think. If you practice in Arizona and typically bill for four (4) units (for example, 97530, 97110, 97110, and 97140), the payment dropped $13.98 or 11.8% compared to what you received for services rendered the first quarter of 2013. However, current payment rates at the 50% MPPR level are a whopping $23.29 or 18.3% below the allowed amount (what we are supposed to get paid).

Compared to 2012 payment levels, this represents a decrease of $9.50 or 8.4%. So, this year you get paid less than you did last year for the same services. Did anyone’s labor cost or rent go down? (Please contact me if you would like to know the specifics for your Medicare locality.)

4.)    Now What?

That’s the question that we all face. Do we stop treating Medicare patients? Do we just accept it? Do we mobilize our Medicare patients to descend upon Washington? Do we change the way we treat? 

These are difficult questions to answer. In my discussions with practice owners around the country, I hear frustration and resignation. CMS is demanding more and more from us: PQRS, functional limitation reporting, onerous documentation standards, and post-treatment audits. Many are considering dropping Medicare patients. Most want to continue to treat this needy population, but are concerned about the fiscal and frustration implications.  

For arguments sake, let’s assume your practice is 100% Medicare and you are able to fill all treatment slots. From a purely financial standpoint you would be better off treating each Medicare patient for only one (1) unit, or 15 minutes, so that the MPPR does not take effect. This is probably not practical as our patients need more than 15 minutes and the compliance side would be just too much. Additionally, it would be inconvenient for the patient and would require many more visits to get a successful outcome. 

The next best financial option would be to perform 30 minutes, or two (2) units, of treatment coupled with some appropriate group activities allowing you to use the 97150 code. This would allow more time with the patient, some in a shared setting. In a 100% Medicare population, this could add nearly $300 in revenue during an eight-hour treatment day per licensee. 

In any case, in order to truly determine how this reduction affects your practice and what changes you’ll make, you must consider Medicare patient’s needs, the percentage of Medicare patients in your practice, staffing, and the culture of your practice.

Suppressing Sticker Shock: How to Handle Your Patients’ High-Deductible Health Plans - Regular BannerSuppressing Sticker Shock: How to Handle Your Patients’ High-Deductible Health Plans - Small Banner
  • The PT’s Guide to Surviving a Medicare Audit Image

    articleMay 30, 2016 | 5 min. read

    The PT’s Guide to Surviving a Medicare Audit

    “How can I avoid being audited by Medicare?” This is one of the compliance questions I hear most frequently, and the honest answer is, quite simply, that you can’t. Just because CMS or one of its auditing entities hasn’t come knocking on your door doesn’t mean you’re not being audited. In fact, every claim you submit undergoes statistical analysis, and Medicare compares your claims data to the data for all other claims submitted. Furthermore, Medicare now analyzes …

  • articleMay 30, 2013 | 6 min. read

    Managing MPPR: A Response to Chuck Felder’s Post from WebPT Co-Founder and PT Heidi Jannenga

    Thank you, Chuck, for presenting such detailed information on the Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) changes. My biggest takeaway from Chuck’s post is that, now more than ever, clinic owners must focus on practice management and truly pay attention to their business. Understanding the metrics of your practice is crucial in this age of declining reimbursements and frequent regulatory changes. There are three crucial metrics that I think come into play when assessing MPPR’s impact on your …

  • Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs Image

    articleNov 9, 2016 | 8 min. read

    Hot Out of the Oven: Highlights of the 2017 Final Rule for PTs, OTs, and SLPs

    Halloween may be over, but if you didn’t get your fill of scares, I’ve got the perfect activity for you: reading through 1,401 pages of pure Medicare gobbledygook. Screaming yet? (Or should I check back at around page 500?) I kid, of course; there’s no need for you to slog through this year’s extra meaty Final Rule —which details the Medicare fee schedule and other important Medicare regulatory and reimbursement changes for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and …

  • Legal Compliance: One More Reason to Collect Patient Deductibles and Copays Image

    articleJul 24, 2017 | 6 min. read

    Legal Compliance: One More Reason to Collect Patient Deductibles and Copays

    Collecting coinsurance, copays, and deductibles upfront is an important piece of the effort to accurately value the services we provide. And yet, we still hear about practices that routinely waive their patients’ deductibles and copays. Today, I’ll discuss another reason not to routinely waive deductibles and copays. In the past, I’ve written about collecting deductibles and copays when a patient presents with a federally funded insurance like Medicare . In cases involving the Department of Justice, the …

  • articleMar 7, 2013 | 5 min. read

    Medicare 8-Minute Rule: So Simple Yet Diabolically Complicated

    Today's post comes from Tom Ambury, PT and compliance officer at  PT Compliance Group . Thanks, Tom! “Tom, how can you make a statement that the Medicare 8-minute rule is simple yet diabolically complicated?” I can make that statement because even though this rule has been in effect for years—and thus, people should have the hang of it—mistakes still happen. And when I talk to therapists about it, a lot of confusion still exists. The 8-minute rule …

  • A Tale of Two Billing Blunders: Overbilling and Misbilling Image

    articleJul 23, 2015 | 6 min. read

    A Tale of Two Billing Blunders: Overbilling and Misbilling

    Billing for physical therapy services is tricky, time-consuming, and nerve-wracking. After all, there are so many rules to follow, and it seems like those rules are constantly changing. That makes mistakes tough to avoid. And in many cases, you might not even know you’re making them. And while an occasional billing error probably isn’t a huge deal, if you’re unknowingly messing up left and right, you could end up in hot water. And if you’re purposely messing …

  • Dual-Coding Wonder Twin Powers: Activate? Image

    articleSep 2, 2015 | 3 min. read

    Dual-Coding Wonder Twin Powers: Activate?

    Thirty days has September—and so has your clinic to prepare for ICD-10. Just one month from now, you’ll have to start using ICD-10 codes on most claims with dates of service on or after October 1, 2015. Did you see I wrote, “most”? That’s not a typo. The reason I can’t say “all” is because not all payers are switching to ICD-10. That means you’ll have to be bi-code-lingual (so don’t purge your brain of all ICD-9 …

  • articleNov 18, 2010 | 4 min. read

    What PTs Should Know About 2011 Final Rule Medicare Changes

    Some major changes are headed our way in terms of the 2011 Medicare Final Rule on the Physician Fee schedule and Other Policies to be effective January 1, 2011.  The Rule included a number of provisions that have impact on outpatient therapy services. The net effect of the policies could lead to payment reductions of approximately 30%. If you see Medicare patients and they impact your revenue, there are several things to pay attention to and deal …

  • What 500,000 Evaluative Notes Told Us About the New CPT Codes Image

    articleAug 2, 2017 | 7 min. read

    What 500,000 Evaluative Notes Told Us About the New CPT Codes

    Back in January, PTs and OTs experienced a pretty dramatic shift in the way they coded for initial evaluations. As you probably—hopefully—recall, this change required therapists to select evaluation CPT codes based on the complexity of each individual eval. (If this doesn’t sound familiar—or if you want a refresher on the details of the new evaluation code set—then I’d recommend reading this post ASAP.) This was a major change—one that thrust our entire profession into uncharted territory. …

Achieve greatness in practice with the ultimate EMR for PTs, OTs, and SLPs.